ZFS Issues


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris ZFS Issues
# 1  
Old 03-09-2011
ZFS Issues

Hi, I am nowusing ZFS since some weeks and now I have 2 questions:

1) in zpool I saw some disk added with the *s2 at the end, I have in mind that should not be ? is this right and if so can I get the *s2 disk out of the zpool ?

2) Zpool has still 2 spare disk but when I try to create a new ZFS FS and like to reserve 450GB to it it tells me:

bash# zfs set reservation=450gb poolA/volume06
cannot set property for 'poolA/volume06': size is greater than available space

bash# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
poolA 6.71T 5.77T 962G 86% ONLINE -

what can this be ?

Thanks,
# 2  
Old 03-09-2011
Show us:
Code:
zfs list

# 3  
Old 03-09-2011
Code:
zfs list 
NAME                     USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
poolA                    6.61T   382K    21K  /g1ng02-H
poolA/volume_vol01   459G  21.0G   459G  /data/volume_vol01
poolA/volume_vol02   424G  25.7G   424G  /data/volume_vol02
poolA/volume_vol03   430G  20.2G   430G  /data/volume_vol03
poolA/volume_vol04   429G  20.7G   429G  /data/volume_vol04
poolA/volume_vol05   663G   237G   663G  /data/volume_vol05
poolA/volume_vol06   434G   382K   434G  /data/volume_vol06
poolA/volume_vol19   851G  48.8G   851G  /data/volume_vol19
poolA/volume_vol49   876G  24.5G   876G  /data/volume_vol49
poolA/volume_vol50   866G  34.4G   866G  /data/volume_vol50
poolA/volume_vol51   481G   419G   481G  /data/volume_vol51

# zpool status
  pool: poolA
 state: ONLINE
 scrub: none requested
config:
        NAME                         STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
       poolA                          ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd125    ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd126    ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd18     ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd129    ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd130    ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd68     ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd69     ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd35s2   ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd66s2   ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd67s2   ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd124s2  ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd32     ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd59     ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd0      ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd2      ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd3      ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd4      ONLINE       0     0     0
          c3t5006016039A0399Bd5      ONLINE       0     0     0

 
reamrk : all disk are 451Gb , except 2 of them are 51GB

---------- Post updated at 01:41 PM ---------- Previous update was at 01:33 PM ----------

and ZFS FS are either set reservation to
poolA/volume_vol01 480G
poolA/volume_vol02 450G
poolA/volume_vol03 450G
poolA/volume_vol04 450G
poolA/volume_vol05 900G
poolA/volume_vol06 450G
poolA/volume_vol19 900G
poolA/volume_vol49 900G
poolA/volume_vol50 900G
poolA/volume_vol51 900G

Last edited by pludi; 03-09-2011 at 08:36 AM.. Reason: code tags
# 4  
Old 03-09-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by manni2
1) in zpool I saw some disk added with the *s2 at the end, I have in mind that should not be ? is this right and if so can I get the *s2 disk out of the zpool ?
No, you cannot remove a non redundant data disk from a pool.
Quote:
2) Zpool has still 2 spare disk but when I try to create a new ZFS FS and like to reserve 450GB to it it tells me:

bash# zfs set reservation=450gb poolA/volume06
cannot set property for 'poolA/volume06': size is greater than available space
...
what can this be ?
ZFS is probably complaining you want to reserve more space than the zvol size property, which you fail to tell.
# 5  
Old 03-09-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlliagre
No, you cannot remove a non redundant data disk from a pool.

What is the different to add the disk or the *s2 ?

So my tought about zfs remove disk*s2 and thena zfs add disk (without s2) would not work ?
# 6  
Old 03-09-2011
It is better to give whole disks to ZFS instead of partitions/slices as it can better tune their cache but this might not be an issue in your case. Where do these disks come from ?

You obviously cannot remove from a pool a disk that contains unique data without breaking (i.e. destroying) the whole pool. You should have create either a mirrored or raidz pool to get this flexibility.
# 7  
Old 03-14-2011
Thanks, ok then I think I will leave the *s2 inside and take care to add the real disk in future. thanks
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Several questions about ZFS

Hi guys! I am student from poland and I am preparing my assignment about Solaris 11 cloud computing capabilities. :p I am writing about ZFS now, and as I am quite new to this stuff I have several question (I prefere to have deep understanding of what I am doing, instead of just rewriting the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mlody94
1 Replies

2. Solaris

ZFS send issues

I have two servers, we'll call them sv1 and sv2. both are Solaris 11.1 LDOMS running on a T4-4 with RBAC enabled. my user has zfs allow send, receive on both servers and has ssh keys shared. on sv2 (the destination) I have a zpool called zones that has no zfs fs built on sv1 (the source) I... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: os2mac
5 Replies

3. Solaris

Solaris11: Permission issues with auto-scrub ZFS pool

Short version: pfexec zpool scrub rpool fails saying I do not have permission to perform that action. Apparently scrub is not one of the pfexec allowed actions. Any idea on how to get around it? Long version: I got tired of manually running scrubs and am trying to set it to happen... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: taltamir
4 Replies

4. Solaris

zfs send receive performance issues

I 'm trying to clone a zfs file system pool/u01 to a new file system called newpool/u01 using following commands zfs list zfs snapshot pool/u01@new zfs send pool/u01@new | zfs -F receive newpool/u01 Its a 100G file system snapshot and copied to same server on different pool and... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: fugitive
9 Replies

5. Solaris

ZFS CRYPT

Hi! I'm a new user... I'm looking for some informations about the ZDF file sytem... In my ubuntu box i have installed cryptkeeper, and i want to know if in Solaris 11 Express can find something similar... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Solarisutente
3 Replies

6. Solaris

ZFS

Hi, I need some advice please. I have this server with a couple of zpools, lets call them pay_serv ukb_pool There are two zones attached to these pools. When I do a zfs list I see this pay_serv 8.41G 265G 8.41G /pay_serv ukb_pool 79.8G 194G 23K /ukb_pool ukb_pool/temp_ps 9.11G... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: giles.cardew
4 Replies

7. Solaris

ZFS

what are all the advantages of ZFS comparing to UFS SVM what is the use of creating file system in a file system in ZFS (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: dinu
15 Replies

8. Solaris

Are you using ZFS ?

With Solaris 11 coming out with a requirement of ZFS on the root disk, I was curious to know who is using the Zeta File System now? I have been using ZFS for the past year and don't plan to go back to UFS since ZFS is much more reliable and easier to maintain. (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: bluescreen
13 Replies

9. Solaris

Help with beginner issues setting up ZFS??

Hi, I'm new to Solaris 11. The goal is to set up a ZFS raid-Z2 NAS. These are the instructions I've been trying to follow, with no luck: "Setting Up an OpenSolaris NAS Box: Father-Son Bonding" (not allowed to post URL) Issues: 1) Root access is evidently required but I don't... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: lakedude
8 Replies

10. Solaris

ZFS Help!!! Can I fix this??

Well I got ZFS going almost in version one and didn't have the money to raid it or mirror it. I run off of 7 - 750GB-1TB USB drives and it's run great for over a year. Recently I needed to power off and move some stuff around and when I powered it back on I got this:... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lacakid
3 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question