The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > IP Networking
.
google unix.com



IP Networking Learn TCP/IP, Internet Protocol, Routing, Routers, Network protocols in this UNIX and Linux forum.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real memory usage is reaching 99.99% Balajipoola007 AIX 2 04-01-2009 05:26 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.40 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 12-27-2008 09:20 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.30 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 09-05-2008 07:50 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.29 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 06-17-2008 01:10 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.27 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 05-14-2008 07:30 PM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2009
jalburger jalburger is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 69
trouble reaching local router interface

I have a processor (Solaris 5.8) with a router locally attached.

We're having trouble pinging the router interface from the processor with a normal ping command. The response from the router is "administratively prohibited", which normally indicates the access list on the router is bouncing the icmp request back.

However, when I issue the ping command with the '-r' parameter (ping -r x.x.x.x), the response is immediately successful. When using '-r', the TTL is limited to one, and the ping is sent to a host on an attached network. The man pages state that normal routing tables are bypassed.

With both methods, our network capture shows icmp leaving x.x.x.104 (solaris processor) destined for x.x.x.126 (router interface). I cannot see much difference besides that in the two packets, besides the TTL.

FWIW, 'netstat -nr' is showing my default gateway to be x.x.x.126.

Anyone have any ideas how I can figure out what's going on?
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2009
sysgate's Avatar
sysgate sysgate is offline Forum Advisor  
Unix based
  
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 1,318
To me it sounds like there's some kind of rule on the router's side to discard ICMP packets with TTL different than one, presumably to avoid connection sharing. Anyway, look on the router's side for rules.
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language translation by Google.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0