![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| HP-UX HP-UX (Hewlett Packard UniX) is Hewlett-Packard's proprietary implementation of the Unix operating system, based on System V. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shared memory in shared library | DreamWarrior | High Level Programming | 12 | 05-30-2007 04:33 PM |
| memory sharing - not shared memory - | elzalem | High Level Programming | 9 | 05-02-2007 07:45 AM |
| Shared Memory segments | catwomen | HP-UX | 2 | 02-28-2006 10:07 AM |
| Shared memory shortage but lots of unused memory | cjcamaro | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 10-13-2004 05:10 PM |
| Shared Memory | Jayathirtha | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 3 | 03-03-2003 12:30 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
HP-UX Trying to Understand Shared Memory Segments
I am fairly new to HP-UX and trying to get a better understanding of the operating system. While poking around a bit I find myself questioning whether I should be concerned about Shared Memory segments with missing CPID and LPID? For example:
ipcs -mp IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Mon Mar 17 12:36:43 2008 T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CPID LPID Shared Memory: m 0 0x411c0846 --rw-rw-rw- root root 720 720 m 1 0x4e0c0002 --rw-rw-rw- root root 720 720 m 2 0x4120127e --rw-rw-rw- root root 720 732 m 48643 0x5e10000b --rw------- root root 2495 2495 The 720 PID is not found any longer. Is this necessarily a problem? The main reason I ask is that we have another server, much busier than this machine and while trying to identify how much shared memory is being used by various processes I have encountered other segments with missing CPID and LPID. Thanks in advance. |
|
||||
|
Thank you Sir
We have a few "kill -9" sysadmins.
This is something I will continue keeping my eye on. Thanks for the info. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|