![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| HP-UX HP-UX (Hewlett Packard UniX) is Hewlett-Packard's proprietary implementation of the Unix operating system, based on System V. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to change tape device name. | fraydey | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 05-12-2008 10:11 AM |
| Constantly updating log files (tail -f? grep? awk?) | nortonloaf | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 12-03-2006 11:20 PM |
| tape device | big123456 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 0 | 10-24-2005 04:36 PM |
| Is it possible to ufsdump to a file instead of a tape device? | PSC | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 8 | 07-21-2004 02:08 PM |
| tape device | jennifer | High Level Programming | 1 | 11-27-2001 05:19 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
tape device files constantly being recreated
Hi,
We've been having problems with our NetWorker Silo servers (running HP-UX) concerning the tape device files under /dev/rmt. For some reason they are constantly being removed/recreated (up to a couple of times per hour): crw-rw-rw- 1 bin bin 205 0x240300 Apr 5 19:07 c36t0d3BEST crw-rw-rw- 1 bin bin 205 0x240380 Apr 5 19:07 c36t0d3BESTb crw-rw-rw- 1 bin bin 205 0x240340 Apr 5 19:07 c36t0d3BESTn crw-rw-rw- 1 bin bin 205 0x2403c0 Apr 13 03:08 c36t0d3BESTnb As you can see the original file is from April 5th and the new one was created today. Periodically the device file will fail to be recreated and errors such as this will appear in the syslog: Apr 9 08:21:08 lgtobk2 vmunix: 0/4/2/0: Inquiry failed on FCP device with device id 0x7e0202 Would anyone have an idea of what is occurring here? I'm by no means an expert on how NetWorker/Legato works so I dunno if this problem would be on the OS side or EMC's side. Thanks! UPDATE: Would the fact that the IBM devices are using the stape instead of the IBM atdd driver be causing this? ioscan... Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description =========================================================================== tape 0 0/1/1/1.1.0 stape CLAIMED DEVICE HP C5683A tape 11 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.0 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 tape 18 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.1 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 tape 19 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.2 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 tape 20 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.3 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 tape 30 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.4 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 tape 31 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.5 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 tape 55 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.6 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 tape 56 0/2/1/0.111.9.2.0.0.7 stape CLAIMED DEVICE IBM ULTRIUM-TD2 Last edited by piper28; 04-13-2009 at 12:02 PM.. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|