Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Static route not added
Operating Systems Linux Red Hat Static route not added Post 302779947 by parth_buch on Wednesday 13th of March 2013 02:23:32 PM
Old 03-13-2013
Smilie OOOopsss.. I wonder why I didn't notice it!!!

Thanks a lot guys for pointing this out...
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

static route ?

Hi, I have a machine that sits on 10.2 network. I need to ssh from this to another box that is on both 10.125 & 10.140 VLANs what should I need to do? Thanks! (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: chaandana
3 Replies

2. HP-UX

Static route for hpux 11.22

I want to make static route how would I proceed? I'm using "route add DestinationIP gatewayIP hop to 1 I would like to make this permanent, so when it reboots I don't want to loose it, would I do this in netconf file? If so where? I did a search got this site, it didn't help much. ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: catwomen
2 Replies

3. Linux

dhcpd.conf - static route

Hi, I've setup DHCP Server on RH linux AS3 and everything works fine except static routes. They are not getting effected on client systems. My dhcpd.conf: +++++++++++ ddns-update-style interim; ddns-updates off; option domain-name-servers 192.168.116.122; option domain-name... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: prvnrk
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Static Route

Hi, Request you to please tell me the command or the process to add the static route in redhat linux. Thanks in Advance. Regards Arun (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Arun.Kakarla
2 Replies

5. AIX

removing static route

#netstat -nr (shows the following with more static routes) 192.168.18.202 10.129.155.1 UGH 0 29 en0 - - and i just want to remove the above one i tried #smitty rmroute destination type= net dest add = 192.168.18.202 default gateway= 10.129.155.1 net... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: pchangba1
1 Replies

6. IP Networking

When to use static route on server?

Hi guys, sorry for asking noob question. When do we really need to add a static route on the server? I encounter this situation whereby a client trigger a network packet to the destination but the destination does not know how to return the traffic back to the client (source). The issue was... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: DrivesMeCrazy
4 Replies

7. AIX

Can not remove static route from AIX 5.3

Dear all, I Try to remove a static route with smitty, but recieve this error: Method error (/usr/lib/methods/chginet): 0514-009 Cannot delete an object from the device configuration database. 0821-216 chginet: Cannot delete route (net,192.168.30.101,192.168.30.1)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hrkama
2 Replies

8. AIX

Edit Static Route

Anyone know how to edit a static route in AIX? I find myself deleting and then recreating the route with the new information. Would be nice to know how to edit the route. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bbbngowc
3 Replies

9. IP Networking

Static route on router

Hi all, This may be the basic question of Routing but I am a sort of new to networking so I am asking. Do I need to put route for my router's LAN port ip to WAN (serial) port ip Or the router itself can communicate between its ports without routes. lan (172.26.40.5) ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dextergenious
3 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Pls. help remove the static route

Hi, I am on Linux Redhat 5.3. I added this static route but now I can't seem to take it out. Can you help? netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 167.76.151.28 192.1.25.249 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: samnyc
1 Replies
MRTG-FAQ(1)							       mrtg							       MRTG-FAQ(1)

NAME
mrtg-faq - How to get help if you have problems with MRTG SYNOPSIS
MRTG seems to raise a lot of questions. There are a number of resources apart from the documentation where you can find help for mrtg. FAQ
In the following sections you'll find some additonal Frequently Asked Questions, with Answers. Why is there no "@#$%" (my native language) version of MRTG? Nobody has contributed a @#$%.pmd file yet. Go into the mrtg-2.17.4/translate directory and create your own translation file. When you are happy with it send it to me for inclusion with the next mrtg release. I need a script to make mrtg work with my xyz device. Probably this has already been done. Check the stuff in the mrtg-2.17.4/contrib directory. There is a file called 00INDEX in that directory which tells what you can find in there. How does this SNMP thing work There are many resources on the net that explain SNMP. Take a look at this article from the Linux Journal by David Guerrero http://www.david-guerrero.com/papers/snmp/ And at this rather long document from CISCO. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/snmp.htm The images created by MRTG look very strange. Remove the *-{week,day,month,year}.png files and start MRTG again. Using MRTG for the first time, you might have to do this twice. This will also help when you introduce new routers into the cfg file. What is my Community Name? Ask the person in charge of your Router or try 'public', as this is the default Community Name. My graphs show a flat line during an outage. Why ? Well, the short answer is that when an SNMP query goes out and a response doesn't come back, MRTG has to assume something to put in the graph, and by default it assumes that the last answer we got back is probably closer to the truth than zero. This assumption is not perfect (as you have noticed). It's a trade-off that happens to fail during a total outage. If this is an unacceptable trade-off, use the unknaszero option. You may want to know what you're trading off, so in the spirit of trade-offs, here's the long answer: The problem is that MRTG doesn't know *why* the data didn't come back, all it knows is that it didn't come back. It has to do something, and it assumes it's a stray lost packet rather than an outage. Why don't we always assume the circuit is down and use zero, which will (we think) be more nearly right? Well, it turns out that you may be taking advantage of MRTG's "assume last" behaviour without being aware of it. MRTG uses SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) to collect data, and SNMP uses UDP (User Datagram Protocol) to ship packets around. UDP is connectionless (not guaranteed) unlike TCP where packets are tracked and acknowledged and, if needed, retransmitted. UDP just throws packets at the network and hopes they arrive. Sometimes they don't. One likely cause of lost SNMP data is congestion; another is busy routers. Other possibilities include transient telecommunications problems, router buffer overflows (which may or may not be congestion-related), "dirty lines" (links with high error rates), and acts of God. These things happen all the time; we just don't notice because many interactive services are TCP-based and the lost packets get retransmitted automatically. In the above cases where some SNMP packets are lost but traffic is flowing, assuming zero is the wrong thing to do - you end up with a graph that looks like it's missing teeth whenever the link fills up. MRTG interpolates the lost data to produce a smoother graph which is more accurate in cases of intermittent packet loss. But with V2.8.4 and above, you can use the "unknaszero" option to produce whichever graph is best under the conditions typical for your network. AUTHOR
Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch> 2.17.4 2012-01-12 MRTG-FAQ(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy