Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris /var/adm/messages not updating Post 302409565 by incredible on Thursday 1st of April 2010 01:25:31 PM
Old 04-01-2010
Any recent activities like OS hardening, etc done prior to this problem? what are the directory and file permissions? default values?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Messages in /var/adm

Just want to check with all of you out there what does the following warning means in my "messages" file in /var/adm the warning is Prevous Time Adjustment Incomplete , does it mean my hard ware is faulty if so which piece of hardware it is ? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: owls
1 Replies

2. Solaris

/var/adm/messages- Help

Solaris 8/ sun 420R Checked /var/adm/messages file and got the following message: Dec 4 16:40:05 serverXYZ ConfigProvider: get_pkg_instdate: getdate failed for the standard C locale (7) Does anyone know what this means? Looked up getdate but do not understand.... Thanks. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: finster
1 Replies

3. Solaris

/var/adm/messages

I'm running a Solaris 9 box with Oracle databases on it. I'm getting the following messages in my /var/adm/messages log "Jun 24 12:30:32 sundb01 bootpd: IP address not found: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" ...where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is DHCP IP addresses of Windows 2000 workstations in the organisation. ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: soliberus
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

/var/adm/messages

Hi, No log entry is found in messages files. The file size is 0. We are using Solaris 9. Anyone knows what could be wrong. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: FrankC
3 Replies

5. Solaris

/var/adm/messages

Hello Friends, I am geting the folowing error in /var/adm/message is it disl related problem? if yes.. how to check all the disk are perfect or not? Sep 15 06:01:12 scsi: WARNING: /pci@1f,700000/scsi@2/sd@2,0 (sd7): Sep 15 06:01:12 Error for Command: write(10) Error Level:... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: bullz26
5 Replies

6. Solaris

/var/adm/messages

Check message file and result posted below. Can anyone tell me what this is a sign of, what does it mean? server1% more messages.0 Dec 02 09:35:06 server1 bsd-gw: Inval id protocol request (65): AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA^\\2... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: finster
6 Replies

7. Solaris

diff b/w /var/log/syslog and /var/adm/messages

hi sirs can u tell the difference between /var/log/syslogs and /var/adm/messages in my working place i am having two servers. in one servers messages file is empty and syslog file is going on increasing.. and in another servers message file is going on increasing but syslog file is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: tv.praveenkumar
2 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

/var/adm/messages vs /var/log/messages

The /var/adm/messages in Solaris seem to log more system messages/errors compared to /var/log/messages in Linux. I checked the log level in Linux and they seem OK. Is there any other log file that contains the messages or is it just that Linux doesn't log great many things? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gomes1333
2 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

trying get the last /var/adm/messages

grep \"^`date "+%b %d %T"`\" /var/adm/messages | egrep \"emerg|alert|crit|err|warning\ but get an output like this ksh: alert: not found ksh: crit: not found ksh: err: not found ksh: warning": not found grep: can't open "19" grep: can't open "16:27:16"" (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: arch12
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Difference between /var/log/syslog and /var/adm/messages

Hi, Is the contents in /var/log/syslog and /var/adm/messages are same?? Regards (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: vks47
3 Replies
HARDENING-CHECK(1)					User Contributed Perl Documentation					HARDENING-CHECK(1)

NAME
       hardening-check - check binaries for security hardening features

SYNOPSIS
       hardening-check [options] [ELF ...]

       Examine a given set of ELF binaries and check for several security hardening features, failing if they are not all found.

DESCRIPTION
       This utility checks a given list of ELF binaries for several security hardening features that can be compiled into an executable. These
       features are:

       Position Independent Executable
	       This indicates that the executable was built in such a way (PIE) that the "text" section of the program can be relocated in memory.
	       To take full advantage of this feature, the executing kernel must support text Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR).

       Stack Protected
	       This indicates that there is evidence that the ELF was compiled with the gcc(1) option -fstack-protector (e.g. uses
	       __stack_chk_fail). The program will be resistant to having its stack overflowed.

	       When an executable was built without any character arrays being allocated on the stack, this check will lead to false alarms (since
	       there is no use of __stack_chk_fail), even though it was compiled with the correct options.

       Fortify Source functions
	       This indicates that the executable was compiled with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 and -O1 or higher. This causes certain unsafe glibc
	       functions with their safer counterparts (e.g. strncpy instead of strcpy), or replaces calls that are verifiable at runtime with the
	       runtime-check version (e.g. __memcpy_chk insteade of memcpy).

	       When an executable was built such that the fortified versions of the glibc functions are not useful (e.g. use is verified as safe
	       at compile time, or use cannot be verified at runtime), this check will lead to false alarms.  In an effort to mitigate this, the
	       check will pass if any fortified function is found, and will fail if only unfortified functions are found. Uncheckable conditions
	       also pass (e.g. no functions that could be fortified are found, or not linked against glibc).

       Read-only relocations
	       This indicates that the executable was build with -Wl,-z,relro to have ELF markings (RELRO) that ask the runtime linker to mark any
	       regions of the relocation table as "read-only" if they were resolved before execution begins. This reduces the possible areas of
	       memory in a program that can be used by an attacker that performs a successful memory corruption exploit.

       Immediate binding
	       This indicates that the executable was built with -Wl,-z,now to have ELF markings (BIND_NOW) that ask the runtime linker to resolve
	       all relocations before starting program execution. When combined with RELRO above, this further reduces the regions of memory
	       available to memory corruption attacks.

OPTIONS
       --nopie, -p
	       No not require that the checked binaries be built as PIE.

       --nostackprotector, -s
	       No not require that the checked binaries be built with the stack protector.

       --nofortify, -f
	       No not require that the checked binaries be built with Fority Source.

       --norelro, -r
	       No not require that the checked binaries be built with RELRO.

       --nobindnow, -b
	       No not require that the checked binaries be built with BIND_NOW.

       --quiet, -q
	       Only report failures.

       --verbose
	       Report verbosely on failures.

       --report-functions
	       After the report, display all external functions needed by the ELF.

       --find-libc-functions
	       Instead of the regular report, locate the libc for the first ELF on the command line and report all the known "fortified" functions
	       exported by libc.

       --color Enable colorized status output.

       --lintian
	       Switch reporting to lintian-check-parsable output.

       --debug Report some debugging during processing.

       --help, -h, -?
	       Print a brief help message and exit.

       --man   Print the manual page and exit.

RETURN VALUE
       When all checked binaries have all checkable hardening features detected, this program will finish with an exit code of 0. If any check
       fails, the exit code with be 1. Individual checks can be disabled via command line options.

AUTHOR
       Kees Cook <kees@debian.org>

COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
       Copyright 2009-2012 Kees Cook <kees@debian.org>.

       This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
       the Free Software Foundation; version 2 or later.

SEE ALSO
       gcc(1), hardening-wrapper(1)

perl v5.14.2							    2012-06-14							HARDENING-CHECK(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy