Sponsored Content
Operating Systems HP-UX Renaming logical volume group and volumes Post 302248554 by trek7300 on Saturday 18th of October 2008 08:44:33 AM
Old 10-18-2008
I don't see any reason why not. Do it on a test VG before you try it on a production one.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. News, Links, Events and Announcements

Did not know about logical volumes

I had just updated - reinstalled - my RH9 to a Fedore Core 3. I did not know about the Logical volumes that automatically combined partitions on drive 1 and 2 into one mounted volume. In my attempts to do something with the hdb2 partition - not knowing that it was already in use - I killed my... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gezi
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

LVM - Extending Logical Volume within Volume Group

Hello, I have logical volume group of 50GB, in which I have 2 logical volumes, LogVol01 and LogVol02, both are of 10GB. If I extend LogVol01 further by 10GB, then it keeps the extended copy after logical volume 2. I want to know where it keeps this information Regards Himanshu (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ghimanshu
3 Replies

3. AIX

Moving a Logical Volume from one Volume Group to Another

Does anyone have any simple methods for moving a current logical volume from one volume group to another? I do not wish to move the data from one physical volume to another. Basically, I want to "relink" the logical volume to exist in a different volume group. Any ideas? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: krisw
2 Replies

4. AIX

Basic Filesystem / Physical Volume / Logical Volume Check

Hi! Can anyone help me on how I can do a basic check on the Unix filesystems / physical volumes and logical volumes? What items should I check, like where do I look at in smit? Or are there commands that I should execute? I need to do this as I was informed by IBM that there seems to be... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: chipahoys
1 Replies

5. HP-UX

Unmount and remove all Logical vol.Volume group and physical disk

Hi, Someone please help me with how i can unmount and remove all the files systems from a cluster. This is being shared by two servers that are active_standby. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: joeli
3 Replies

6. AIX

Logical volume name conflict in two volume group

Hello, I am a french computer technician, and i speak English just a little. On Aix 5.3, I encounter a name conflict logical volume on two volume group. The first volume lvnode01 is OK in rootvg and mounted. It is also consistent in the ODM root # lsvg -l rootvg |grep lvnode01 ... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: dantares
10 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Confusion Regarding Physical Volume,Volume Group,Logical Volume,Physical partition

Hi, I am new to unix. I am working on Red Hat Linux and side by side on AIX also. After reading the concepts of Storage, I am now really confused regarding the terminologies 1)Physical Volume 2)Volume Group 3)Logical Volume 4)Physical Partition Please help me to understand these concepts. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: kashifsd17
6 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

How to create a volume group, logical volume group and file system?

hi, I want to create a volume group of 200 GB and then create different file systems on that. please help me out. Its becomes confusing when the PP calculating PP. I don't understand this concept. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kamaldev
2 Replies

9. Ubuntu

Rename Root Logical Volume group?

Hello, I'm running Ubuntu 12.04. I need to rename my root logical volume group and it's bootmanager/fstab accordingly. Here is the output: I need to change the HP-TEST001 to PRODGROUP01. Please advice me. root@PROD-02:/home# vgdisplay --- Volume group --- VG Name HP-TEST001 System ID... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: moneynut
2 Replies

10. Red Hat

No space in volume group. How to create a file system using existing logical volume

Hello Guys, I want to create a file system dedicated for an application installation. But there is no space in volume group to create a new logical volume. There is enough space in other logical volume which is being mounted on /var. I know we can use that logical volume and create a virtual... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vamshigvk475
2 Replies
Apache::TestSmoke(3pm)					User Contributed Perl Documentation				    Apache::TestSmoke(3pm)

NAME
Apache::TestSmoke - Special Tests Sequence Failure Finder SYNOPSIS
# get the usage and the default values % t/SMOKE -help # repeat all tests 5 times and save the report into # the file 'myreport' % t/SMOKE -times=5 -report=myreport # run all tests default number of iterations, and repeat tests # default number of times % t/SMOKE # same as above but work only the specified tests % t/SMOKE foo/bar foo/tar # run once a sequence of tests in a non-random mode # e.g. when trying to reduce a known long sequence that fails % t/SMOKE -order=rotate -times=1 foo/bar foo/tar # show me each currently running test # it's not the same as running the tests in the verbose mode % t/SMOKE -verbose # run t/TEST, but show any problems after *each* tests is run # useful for bug reports (it actually runs t/TEST -start, then # t/TEST -run for each test separately and finally t/TEST -stop % t/SMOKE -bug_mode # now read the created report file DESCRIPTION
The Problem When we try to test a stateless machine (i.e. all tests are independent), running all tests once ensures that all tested things properly work. However when a state machine is tested (i.e. where a run of one test may influence another test) it's not enough to run all the tests once to know that the tested features actually work. It's quite possible that if the same tests are run in a different order and/or repeated a few times, some tests may fail. This usually happens when some tests don't restore the system under test to its pristine state at the end of the run, which may influence other tests which rely on the fact that they start on pristine state, when in fact it's not true anymore. In fact it's possible that a single test may fail when run twice or three times in a sequence. The Solution To reduce the possibility of such dependency errors, it's helpful to run random testing repeated many times with many different srand seeds. Of course if no failures get spotted that doesn't mean that there are no tests inter-dependencies, which may cause a failure in production. But random testing definitely helps to spot many problems and can give better test coverage. Resolving Sequence Problems When this kind of testing is used and a failure is detected there are two problems: 1. First is to be able to reproduce the problem so if we think we fixed it, we could verify the fix. This one is easy, just remember the sequence of tests run till the failed test and rerun the same sequence once again after the problem has been fixed. 2. Second is to be able to understand the cause of the problem. If during the random test the failure has happened after running 400 tests, how can we possibly know which previously running tests has caused to the failure of the test 401. Chances are that most of the tests were clean and don't have inter-dependency problem. Therefore it'd be very helpful if we could reduce the long sequence to a minimum. Preferably 1 or 2 tests. That's when we can try to understand the cause of the detected problem. This utility attempts to solve both problems, and at the end of each iteration print a minimal sequence of tests causing to a failure. This doesn't always succeed, but works in many cases. This utility: 1. Runs the tests randomly until the first failure is detected. Or non-randomly if the option -order is set to repeat or rotate. 2. Then it tries to reduce that sequence of tests to a minimum, and this sequence still causes to the same failure. 3. (XXX: todo): then it reruns the minimal sequence in the verbose mode and saves the output. 4. It reports all the successful reductions as it goes to STDOUT and report file of the format: smoke-report-<date>.txt. In addition the systems build parameters are logged into the report file, so the detected problems could be reproduced. 5. Goto 1 and run again using a new random seed, which potentially should detect different failures. Reduction Algorithm Currently for each reduction path, the following reduction algorithms get applied: 1. Binary search: first try the upper half then the lower. 2. Random window: randomize the left item, then the right item and return the items between these two points. t/SMOKE.PL t/SMOKE.PL is driving this module, if you don't have it, create it: #!perl use strict; use warnings FATAL => 'all'; use FindBin; use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../Apache-Test/lib"; use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../lib"; use Apache::TestSmoke (); Apache::TestSmoke->new(@ARGV)->run; usually Makefile.PL converts it into t/SMOKE while adjusting the perl path, but you create t/SMOKE in first place as well. AUTHOR
Stas Bekman perl v5.14.2 2011-02-08 Apache::TestSmoke(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy