Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Which is more expensive ?
Top Forums Programming Which is more expensive ? Post 302131746 by vino on Monday 13th of August 2007 01:55:39 PM
Old 08-13-2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by reborg
I don't think there would be any real difference here, there might me a very marginal improvement in the second case due to the number of comparison you are doing, but would expect that to be marginal. You are after all incrementing the same number of times in both cases anc calling close() the same number of time.

Just curious, is this shutdown code or is it after forking that you are closing the open fds?
This is for closing the open fds after forking. I was told that you generally need to close only 64 fds instead of the RLIMIT.rlim_cur after forking. Any thoughts ?
 

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

calling pthread_self (on ubuntu), expensive?

Hi all, Is anyone aware of what operations are involved when a call to pthread_self() is made, obtaining the unique thread ID on a Ubuntu system (or even any Linux flavour)? Specifically, to retrieve the thread id, is there any locking required or atomic operations? I'm building an... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: gorga
11 Replies

2. What is on Your Mind?

Very Expensive Running Shoes

You really should not need one third of the entire US budget to buy a pair of running shoes... even if they are name brand. What have these guys been smoking? It reminds me of the old joke... Customer: At those prices you aren't going to sell many shoes. Salesman: Ah, but all we need to do is... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Perderabo
4 Replies
pts(7D) 							      Devices								   pts(7D)

NAME
pts - STREAMS pseudo-tty slave driver DESCRIPTION
The pseudo-tty subsystem simulates a terminal connection, where the master side represents the terminal and the slave represents the user process's special device end point. In order to use the pseudo-tty subsystem, a node for the master side driver /dev/ptmx and N nodes for the slave driver (N is determined at installation time) must be installed. The names of the slave devices are /dev/pts/M where M has the values 0 through N-1. When the master device is opened, the corresponding slave device is automatically locked out. No user may open that slave device until its permissions are adjusted and the device unlocked by calling functions grantpt(3C) and unlockpt(3C). The user can then invoke the open system call with the name that is returned by the ptsname(3C) function. See the example below. Only one open is allowed on a master device. Multiple opens are allowed on the slave device. After both the master and slave have been opened, the user has two file descriptors which are end points of a full duplex connection composed of two streams automatically connected at the master and slave drivers. The user may then push modules onto either side of the stream pair. The user needs to push the ptem(7M) and ldterm(7M) modules onto the slave side of the pseudo-terminal subsystem to get terminal semantics. The master and slave drivers pass all messages to their adjacent queues. Only the M_FLUSH needs some processing. Because the read queue of one side is connected to the write queue of the other, the FLUSHR flag is changed to the FLUSHW flag and vice versa. When the master device is closed an M_HANGUP message is sent to the slave device which will render the device unusable. The process on the slave side gets the errno EIO when attempting to write on that stream but it will be able to read any data remaining on the stream head read queue. When all the data has been read, read returns 0 indicating that the stream can no longer be used. On the last close of the slave device, a 0-length message is sent to the master device. When the application on the master side issues a read() or getmsg() and 0 is returned, the user of the master device decides whether to issue a close() that dismantles the pseudo-terminal subsystem. If the master device is not closed, the pseudo-tty subsystem will be available to another user to open the slave device. Since 0-length messages are used to indicate that the process on the slave side has closed and should be interpreted that way by the process on the master side, applications on the slave side should not write 0-length messages. If that occurs, the write returns 0, and the 0-length message is discarded by the ptem mod- ule. The standard STREAMS system calls can access the pseudo-tty devices. The slave devices support the O_NDELAY and O_NONBLOCK flags. EXAMPLES
int fdm fds; char *slavename; extern char *ptsname(); fdm = open("/dev/ptmx", O_RDWR); /* open master */ grantpt(fdm); /* change permission of slave */ unlockpt(fdm); /* unlock slave */ slavename = ptsname(fdm); /* get name of slave */ fds = open(slavename, O_RDWR); /* open slave */ ioctl(fds, I_PUSH, "ptem"); /* push ptem */ ioctl(fds, I_PUSH, "ldterm"); /* push ldterm*/ FILES
/dev/ptmx master clone device /dev/pts/M slave devices (M = 0 -> N-1) SEE ALSO
grantpt(3C), ptsname(3C), unlockpt(3C), ldterm(7M), ptm(7D), ptem(7M) STREAMS Programming Guide SunOS 5.10 21 Aug 1992 pts(7D)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy