👤
Home Man
Search
Today's Posts
Register

Tell your work related tech stories and share experiences here. Share your successes and failures and other "war stories" in this forum.

Linus Torvalds reply about Meltdown and Spectre.

👤 Login to reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
# 1  
Old 01-24-2018
Linus Torvalds reply about Meltdown and Spectre.

Apologies if this is the wrong forum but...

...This is hard hitting stuff.

LKML: Linus Torvalds: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to wisecracker For This Useful Post:
Corona688 (01-24-2018), dodona (01-25-2018), hicksd8 (01-24-2018), rbatte1 (01-24-2018)
# 2  
Old 01-25-2018
Quote:
As it is, the patches are COMPLETE AND UTTER GARBAGE.
.. for a only hypothetical problem.
# 3  
Old 01-25-2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodona
.. for a only hypothetical problem.
Perhaps, perhaps not; a hardware design problem that goes back decades just to get performance figures to sell their CPUs is more than bad to say the least - especially when the manufacturers knew about it.
Also, it can't be that hypothetical if it has been proven to work. It is the big/gigantic sytems that will be affected by these patches not so much the piffling little stuff like my MacBook Pro. I can handle a performance hit knowing about it now but can the big guns? <- Rhetorical!

But unless one has experience of writing kernels and OSes then one can't possibly know how difficult it is to create patches, (that will inherently give a performance hit just to _correct_ a deliberate manufacturing fault for profit), that will not slow things down too much.
# 4  
Old 01-27-2018
The x86 monoculture leads to risks like this.
See also --> OS monoculture...
# 5  
Old 02-01-2018
I read that with the 4.15 Kernel with build-in patches for the hypothetical problem comes with 15-30% performance loss. Immediately I thought 'wow, Intel, AMD and the hardware pushers will earn a lot of $'. I mean todays cpu is so fast that there isn't a need for a upgrade. However the hypothetical problem with the 15-30% performance loss is the need for an upgrade. Again everything comes down to $, and nothing else than $.
# 6  
Old 02-01-2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodona
I read that with the 4.15 Kernel with build-in patches for the hypothetical problem comes with 15-30% performance loss.
That's way overblown, because the performance loss happens during the switch between userspace and kernelspace. Sensible programs don't spend most of their time doing thousands of tiny system calls.

A 30% reduction in performance there is bad, but not the same as a 30% slower computer.
👤 Login to reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIX 6.1, POWER5 and Spectre/Meltdown the_garbage AIX 8 3 Weeks Ago 05:47 PM
Meltdown and Spectre CPU bugs Scrutinizer What is on Your Mind? 8 05-26-2018 05:26 AM
A Couple of Short Linus Torvalds Videos Perderabo News, Links, Events and Announcements 0 01-23-2007 12:28 AM
hard disk meltdown Henrik Filesystems, Disks and Memory 3 11-05-2002 10:41 AM
What the best HD format for Unix & Linus jeffersno1 Filesystems, Disks and Memory 1 02-09-2002 09:35 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.

Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright©1993-2018. All Rights Reserved.
×
UNIX.COM Login
Username:
Password:  
Show Password