Linus Torvalds reply about Meltdown and Spectre.


Login or Register to Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
# 1  
Linus Torvalds reply about Meltdown and Spectre.

Apologies if this is the wrong forum but...

...This is hard hitting stuff.

LKML: Linus Torvalds: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation
These 4 Users Gave Thanks to wisecracker For This Post:
# 2  
Quote:
As it is, the patches are COMPLETE AND UTTER GARBAGE.
.. for a only hypothetical problem.
# 3  
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodona
.. for a only hypothetical problem.
Perhaps, perhaps not; a hardware design problem that goes back decades just to get performance figures to sell their CPUs is more than bad to say the least - especially when the manufacturers knew about it.
Also, it can't be that hypothetical if it has been proven to work. It is the big/gigantic sytems that will be affected by these patches not so much the piffling little stuff like my MacBook Pro. I can handle a performance hit knowing about it now but can the big guns? <- Rhetorical!

But unless one has experience of writing kernels and OSes then one can't possibly know how difficult it is to create patches, (that will inherently give a performance hit just to _correct_ a deliberate manufacturing fault for profit), that will not slow things down too much.
# 5  
I read that with the 4.15 Kernel with build-in patches for the hypothetical problem comes with 15-30% performance loss. Immediately I thought 'wow, Intel, AMD and the hardware pushers will earn a lot of $'. I mean todays cpu is so fast that there isn't a need for a upgrade. However the hypothetical problem with the 15-30% performance loss is the need for an upgradeSmilie. Again everything comes down to $, and nothing else than $.Smilie
# 6  
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodona
I read that with the 4.15 Kernel with build-in patches for the hypothetical problem comes with 15-30% performance loss.
That's way overblown, because the performance loss happens during the switch between userspace and kernelspace. Sensible programs don't spend most of their time doing thousands of tiny system calls.

A 30% reduction in performance there is bad, but not the same as a 30% slower computer.
Login or Register to Reply

|
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:
Advanced Search

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
AIX 6.1, POWER5 and Spectre/Meltdown
the_garbage
Apologies for this newbie question. We have inherited an IBM p5 520 (9111-520) running AIX 6.1.0.0 which seems to be the base install and no further patches installed. Is this vulnerable to the Spectre/Meltdown threat? Are patches available? Looks like AIX 6.1.0.0 went 'end of support' in...... AIX
8
AIX
Meltdown and Spectre CPU bugs
Scrutinizer
This seems a bit serious: Meltdown, Spectre: The password theft bugs at the heart of Intel CPUs The Register Vulnerability Note VU#584653 - CPU hardware vulnerable to side-channel attacks Project Zero: Reading privileged memory with a side-channel... What is on Your Mind?
8
What is on Your Mind?
A Couple of Short Linus Torvalds Videos
Perderabo
This link is to a page that has two short videos that feature Linus Torvalds discussing the Linux kernel. After you watch the first video, scroll down some more to reach the second video.... News, Links, Events and Announcements
0
News, Links, Events and Announcements

Featured Tech Videos