Why is RAID0 faster?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Why is RAID0 faster?
# 8  
Old 06-05-2010
Ah. Most disk and memory busses are far faster than the disks attached. Disks transfer in quick bursts and don't monopolize the bus.
 
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Raid0 array stresses only 1 disk out of 3

Hi there, I've setup a raid0 array of 3 identical disks using : mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=stripe --raid-devices=3 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1I'm using dstat to monitor the disk activity : dstat --epoch -D sdb,sdc,sdd --disk-util 30The results show that the stress is not... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: chebarbudo
8 Replies

2. Solaris

Cloning RAID0 drives, Solaris 10u11

Hello all, this is my first time posting here. Where I work we have multiple servers (x3-2's) running Solaris 10u11 with 2 drives configured as RAID0, 300GB per. There are 4-6 open slots for drives to clone to. Past attempts to clone/backup these drives has failed. One of the machines is... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: eprlsguy
1 Replies

3. Hardware

HP9000 Server - Stuck on RAID0

Hey all, I've got an old HP9000 L1000 server with HP-UX installed. The drives that the OS is running on are in RAID0. I am concerned for the reliability of the server. The four hard drives in the front of the server are LVD 18.2 drives. I know with RAID0, if one drive fails, they all fail. ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mroselli
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Which system is faster?

i'm trying to decide if to move operations from one of these hosts to the other. but i cant decide which one of them is the most powerful. each host has 8 cpus. HOSTA processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 44 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
6 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

live upgrade with raid0 soft partitions

Hi, I have this mirrored system with soft-partitions. I have a difficulty determining the lucreate cmd in this env. #metastat -p d0 -m d10 d20 1 d10 1 1 c1t2d0s0 d20 1 1 c1t3d0s0 d1 -m d11 d21 1 d11 1 1 c1t2d0s5 d21 1 1 c1t3d0s5 d100 -p d1 -o 58720384 -b 8388608 d200 -p d1 -o... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: chaandana
1 Replies

6. Linux

Raid0 recovery from external HD

Hi, I have the Lacie Big Disk, which is a external hard drive enclosure in a hardware RAID0 array of 2x250GB disks. The RAID controller seems to have died, leaving me with 2 working hard drives but no way to get the data. I tried hooking the drives up to a windows machine and using Raid... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dangral
4 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Which command will be faster? y?

i)wc -c/etc/passwd|awk'{print $1}' ii)ls -al/etc/passwd|awk'{print $5}' (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: karthi_g
4 Replies

8. Solaris

Solaris RAID0 doubt...

friends, Suppose I am typing metastat command and it is showing: d100: Concat/Stripe Size: 369495 blocks (180 MB) Stripe 0: (interlace: 32 blocks) Device Start Block Dbase Reloc c1d0s0 16065 Yes Yes c1d0s1 0 No Yes... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: saagar
4 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Faster then cp ?

Hi , I need to copy every day about 35GB of files from one file system to another. Im using the cp command and its toke me about 25 min. I also tried to use dd command but its toke much more. Is there better option ? Regards. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: yoavbe
6 Replies

10. IP Networking

Mandrake should be faster.

For some reason 8.1 Mandrake Linux seems much slower than Windows 2000 with my cable modem. DSL reports test says they conferable speed with Windows2 though. This is consistant slow with both of my boxes, at the same time. Linux used to be faster, but not with Mandrake. Any way to fix this? (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: lancest
17 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question
HPTRR(4)						   BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual 						  HPTRR(4)

NAME
hptrr -- HighPoint RocketRAID device driver SYNOPSIS
To compile this driver into the kernel, place the following line in your kernel configuration file: device hptrr device scbus device da Alternatively, to load the driver as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): hptrr_load="YES" The following tunables are settable from the loader: hw.hptrr.attach_generic set to 1 to permit driver attach to chips with generic Marvell (non-HighPoint) PCI identification. These chips are also supported by ata(4) and mvs(4). Some vendors are using same chips, but without providing RAID BIOS. DESCRIPTION
The hptrr driver provides support for HighPoint's RocketRAID based RAID controllers. These devices support SATA/ATA disk drives and provide RAID0 (striping), RAID1 (mirroring), and RAID5 functionality. HARDWARE
The hptrr driver supports the following RAID controllers: o RocketRAID 172x series o RocketRAID 174x series o RocketRAID 2210 o RocketRAID 222x series o RocketRAID 2240 o RocketRAID 230x series o RocketRAID 231x series o RocketRAID 232x series o RocketRAID 2340 o RocketRAID 2522 NOTES
The hptrr driver only works on the i386 and amd64 platforms as it requires a binary blob object from the manufacturer which they only supply for these platforms. The hptrr driver does not work on i386 with pae(4) enabled. This driver does not support the RR182x series controller. See the hptmv(4) manual page for details on support. This driver supersedes the older rr232x driver. SEE ALSO
ata(4), cam(4), hptmv(4), mvs(4), loader(8) HISTORY
The hptrr device driver first appeared in FreeBSD 6.3. AUTHORS
The hptrr device driver was written by HighPoint Technologies, Inc., and ported to FreeBSD by Scott Long. This manual page was written by David E. O'Brien. BUGS
The hptrr driver does not support manipulating the RAID from the OS, RAIDs need to be set up from the on-board BIOS. BSD
June 6, 2012 BSD