Which UNIX OS is going to give me the most versatility? I Want Total Control


Login or Register for Dates, Times and to Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
# 1  
Which UNIX OS is going to give me the most versatility? I Want Total Control

I am going to be switching to something Unix for my primary OS, and I really need to know right now, which one is going to be able handle getting tweaked up entirely, and be able to stay fluent doing all the stuff I plan on doing using Unix?

I need to be able to have grass roots control sometimes, and get as close to hardware and their instructions as practical . Then the rest of the time, I also would like it to be fluent on its own, for efficiency and convenience, and wouldn't mind it packaged with the essentials, like having codecs; also handling basic drivers on its own would be a big plus.

That being said, I still want to be able to get at anything/everything (all the nooks and crannies) without it being an obstacle to get at, but it's also nice to have the OS accommodating me while doing that as much as practical.

Just a few examples of the things I'm envisioning doing (some demanding, some convenient, and some stuff just insanity and recklessness, and antics that you would maybe say aren't possible if they didn't sound like they could work):

- Put a second OS on the machine, completely gut it, like, straight up filleting the stuff I don't want out of the hard-drive and leaving only the bare bones, restricting it from taking up CPU usage, and letting it run in the background as just a command line.

- Rigging up ports on my motherboard to hook up devices that aren't meant for computers, or in some cases never intended to be hooked up to anything period.

- Keeping a surrogate PC solely as a first line 'dummy' so disruptive garbage getting dumped off by the internet for no reason gets sent there instead, that way I can look at the endless piles of crap and headaches and get to just stare at in awe without having it already being on my computer first. Then periodically do fresh installs on the dummy, and make it so the installer sets it back up for being a surrogate again automatically.

- Logging anything and everything that ever takes place on my computer, as one big unmanageable volume of raw data stored in the form of random characters and symbols that can't even be translated back into anything .

- Logging instructions from my actual processor by mining it out of my RAM, yielding mounds of gibberish to be read through by me later for no reason.

# 2  
Asking for total control is easy - executing total control in a knowing and responsible way affords knowledge and "wisdom" and on a "total" level the knowledge and wisdom should be matchingly total.

Most of the things you describe are either so "outlandish" that they are run-of-the-mill ("install a second OS" - oh my god, you might have invented virtualisation) or common traits of any UNIX (or Linux) system ("dump the memory" - so what, i do that on a regular basis).

But what takes the biscuit is:

Quote:
to hook up devices that aren't meant for computers, or in some cases never intended to be hooked up to anything period
I just tried that and attached a banana which was sitting in my refrigerator for the last 3 weeks to my USB port. The outcome - well there was no outcome, but my choice of OS had probably nothing to do with it, even though i have total control and am able to print out arbitrarily sized mounds of gibberish from the RAM using a symbolic debugger.

I suspect if you could glean any meaning from the output of a kernel debugger you wouldn't be asking such questions. So how about you drop the i-am-such-a-crazy-hAXX0R-antics and tell us what you really want? You might even get some answer which will really help you.

I hope this helps.

bakunin

Last edited by bakunin; 05-28-2016 at 09:54 AM..
These 2 Users Gave Thanks to bakunin For This Post:
# 3  
Haha. I started out typing trying to ask this as a serious question though, which OS would be best for tinkering around with but not overly burdening on a user?
I should mention I'm going to be using Unix for the first time, but I'm competent with computers, and the reason I want to use Unix is to because I want to learn more skills and I'm sick of Windows basically telling me I'm not allowed to.

Also, with the having two operating systems thing, how easy is it to use one operating to gut the other operating system to just the command line while keeping perks of that operating system (file types unique to that operating system, etc.)
I'd only want a second operating system if it didn't take up any CPU (as them various operating systems out there seem to like to do, all the time for little or no reason).

Anyways, I appreciate any help or advice, and yes, despite the jokes I am looking for advice, haha.

Also, my strategy with learning the various new commands and any coding or whatever is to just shamelessly speed-use google for the commands or whatever I'm looking for,
I always just google my code whenever I need code for something for whatever reason, and its never taken me more than 25 seconds to find the code I was thinking of

Last edited by metacogitans; 05-28-2016 at 11:14 AM..
# 4  
Well if you really want to "tweak the guts of the O/S" I guess you need to start from source code; is that what you mean?

There are a number of Linux distros that allow you to download the whole source code and then compile if you've got CPU cycles to burn and a few hours to do it in. I know that Ubuntu will allow that. Also Gentoo provides kernel tailoring letting you build the O/S you want.

Understanding all this can be an issue if you haven't done it before. There's a project called Linux From Scratch (LFS) which provides source code but also a book in both digital and hardcopy which describes the internals of how the kernel is built. That might be a good place to start.
This User Gave Thanks to hicksd8 For This Post:
# 5  
Quote:
Originally Posted by metacogitans
Haha. I started out typing trying to ask this as a serious question though, which OS would be best for tinkering around with but not overly burdening on a user?
Good. Now we are making progress.

Quote:
Originally Posted by metacogitans
I should mention I'm going to be using Unix for the first time, but I'm competent with computers, and the reason I want to use Unix is to because I want to learn more skills and I'm sick of Windows basically telling me I'm not allowed to.
When you are coming from Windows you probably might want to use Ubuntu or a similar beginners-oriented Linux. The extensive interface is helping the beginner. I am not the biggest fan of these all-integrated desktop solutions but i have to admit these GUIs are like braces: they hinder you to run effectively but help you to learn walking. As long as you learn to walk use them, consider doing away with them once you start running. So you might reconsider your choice and select, say, FreeBSD once you have worked for some time with UNIX, but start easy and step up later.

But even then, UNIX (i use a very loose definition here, including Linux, FreeBSD and a few others) is at the base very similar: most things in UNIX are configured via configuration files and different GUIs are just different ways of filling these files from a graphical interface. Understand the exact syntax of the config file and you could do the same with a simple text editor, probably even faster. This is why your choice of a certain GUI will always be a reversible one. Take one you like and when your preferences change take another.

Quote:
Originally Posted by metacogitans
Also, with the having two operating systems thing, how easy is it to use one operating to gut the other operating system to just the command line while keeping perks of that operating system (file types unique to that operating system, etc.)
I'd only want a second operating system if it didn't take up any CPU (as them various operating systems out there seem to like to do, all the time for little or no reason).
You can set up two different OSes alongside, having them share the users data. I do that routinely when i set up a new laptop, because if i happen to configure the "main" OS into oblivion i can still boot the second OS and repair that. Because OS, applications, application data and user data are strictly separated in UNIX it is easy to have two separate installations of the OS which share a common set of the non-OS data.

What you are about, though, is perhaps a virtualised "guest" OS running in a virtual machine. There are several solutions to this and they all work - save for certain details - equally well. You do not have to run such a guest OS in background, you can start it only when you need it. It is even easy to clone such a vertual system (its "hard disk" is in fact a file on your disk which you can simply copy) and i make heavy use of virtual systems for test purposes: i have a (actually several) prepared standard-images and if i want to try something potentially dangerous i create a copy of one of these, fire it up, execute the test and if it works - fine, if it doesn't: i just scratch the system and start over with a new copy of the image.

Such virtual systems will take up no resources at all if they are not running (save for a few GB of disk space for the disk images) but to run maybe even several of these at the same time you needs some RAM. If you consider buying a new system my suggestion is: you might not need the latest and fastest in processor technology, but it should be a 64-bit processor and you should consider a minimum of 16GB of RAM. Linux can run in 2GB comfortably, but fire up 3 different Windows-guests with 4GB each and that leaves only 4 of the existing 16GB to your host system.


Quote:
Originally Posted by metacogitans
Also, my strategy with learning the various new commands and any coding or whatever is to just shamelessly speed-use google for the commands or whatever I'm looking for,
I always just google my code whenever I need code for something for whatever reason, and its never taken me more than 25 seconds to find the code I was thinking of
UNIX is - probably more so than any other OS - about understanding what you do, even more so than knowing the detailed way to do it. You can easily google a certain latin phrase or word, but this will not be the same as really speaking latin. But even if speaking latin fluently you might profit from having google at your disposal as an extensive dictionary for the odd wod you don't know.

There is no shame at all in using reference material, as there is no shame in a translator using a dictionary. It still doesn't exempt him from having to understand the language he is translating. And it doesn't exempt the systems administrator of having to understand how things work.

I hope this helps.

bakunin
This User Gave Thanks to bakunin For This Post:
# 6  
Creating your own distro with OpenSUSE would give you the most control because finding specific packages (RPM) is much easier. However, Xubuntu would give you less headaches and because it's Ubuntu based, you'd have better supported packages to work with and something that doesn't ask too much from your computer. Most copy and paste to terminal guides are based on Ubuntu these days.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This User Gave Thanks to TheOuterLinux For This Post:
# 7  
Edit: Woah, why did my double post just turn into embedded quotes telling everyone about the word of tapatalk?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hicksd8
Well if you really want to "tweak the guts of the O/S" I guess you need to start from source code; is that what you mean?

There are a number of Linux distros that allow you to download the whole source code and then compile if you've got CPU cycles to burn and a few hours to do it in. I know that Ubuntu will allow that. Also Gentoo provides kernel tailoring letting you build the O/S you want.

Understanding all this can be an issue if you haven't done it before. There's a project called Linux From Scratch (LFS) which provides source code but also a book in both digital and hardcopy which describes the internals of how the kernel is built. That might be a good place to start.
I guess my first question is, why is the source code taking up that much memory when it's just the source code for the kernel? Everything else that is running is converted into instructions for hardware by the kernel, correct?
So what do you mean by 'the whole source code', and why would compiling it take hours? 'What' about an operating system's source code would take hours to compile?

---------- Post updated at 02:45 AM ---------- Previous update was at 02:27 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOuterLinux
Creating your own distro with OpenSUSE would give you the most control because finding specific packages (RPM) is much easier. However, Xubuntu would give you less headaches and because it's Ubuntu based, you'd have better supported packages to work with and something that doesn't ask too much from your computer. Most copy and paste to terminal guides are based on Ubuntu these days.

Code:
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Thanks for the insight; what about Xubuntu will 'give less headaches' though? Does it have barriers for certain things that I might as well just have a different operating system to get past?
Having a tidy-looking GUI with all my regularly used doodads on it is nice for something aesthetically pleasing or if I want to showcase how cool my desktop looks, but if that's its only perk I'd rather just turn 'desktop' into a text file with the names of my favorite processes listed in it for me to look at in it in case I forgot what they were.
I plan on keeping things tidily organized in folders, and the GUI is going to be there for me just so I can rearrange the size of the boxes things are displayed as. But I'm not looking for a completely gimp GUI either

Last edited by Corona688; 05-30-2016 at 02:38 PM.. Reason: Removed screen-filling browswer-warping image, sorry
Login or Register for Dates, Times and to Reply

Previous Thread | Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:
Advanced Search

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

For SFTP connection - How to give password in UNIX Script (ksh)

Hi, I am not able to give the password in Unix script for SFTP connection. When I am trying to manully SFTP command for accessing the server , it asking for pwd and I could provide the pwd but I am not getting how to provide the pwd inside the Unix script. sftp -v user@xyz.com. ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vineeta Nigam
4 Replies

2. Programming

Please give me some advise to program for unix/linux using c/c++?

I have a good foundation of c++.I want to learn to program for linux/unix,can you give me some advises,for example classic books ,which operating system is used better(freebsd,solaris,federal linux.etc),and which aspects uses mostly in job.Can you give me clear direction for working or learning. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: fengshuiyue
1 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Calculate total space, total used space and total free space in filesystem names matching keyword

Good afternoon! Im new at scripting and Im trying to write a script to calculate total space, total used space and total free space in filesystem names matching a keyword (in this one we will use keyword virginia). Please dont be mean or harsh, like I said Im new and trying my best. Scripting... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bigben1220
4 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to use the programming in UNIX to count the total G+C and the GC%?What command li

Seems like can use awk and perl command. But I don't have the idea to write the command line. Thanks for all of your advise. For example, if I have the file whose content are: Sample 1. ATAGCAGAGGGAGTGAAGAGGTGGTGGGAGGGAGCT Sample 2. ACTTTTATTTGAATGTAATATTTGGGACAATTATTC Sample 3.... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: patrick chia
1 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

can some one give me some link about process and job control commands

can some one give me some link about process and job control commands (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: alokjyotibal
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

grep running total/ final total across multiple files

Ok, another fun hiccup in my UNIX learning curve. I am trying to count the number of occurrences of an IP address across multiple files named example.hits. I can extract the number of occurrences from the files individually but when you use grep -c with multiple files you get the output similar to... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: MrAd
5 Replies

7. HP-UX

How should I know the total RAM available on UNIX

Hi How Should I know the Total RAM available on HP-UX box? (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: skull123
7 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Unix System Total Replication

Is there any way to totally replicate a unix system from one hardisk to another? And be able to swap the hardisk and restart the system without any error? TQ (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: nuraman
4 Replies

Featured Tech Videos