Restrict service account from direct interactive sessions


Login or Register to Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
# 1  
Restrict service account from direct interactive sessions

Environment: CentOS 7

I would like to have a solution where a service account can access a server in only these ways:
  • ssh non-interactively via password or ssh key; that is, run commands or scripts (but running anything in /etc/shells will not be allowed)
  • not ssh interactively
  • regular users can su $serviceaccount or otherwise get an interactive shell

The purpose is to make users log in to the server as themselves, and then switch user, but also to allow the service account to interact with itself through scripted processes from other servers.

I have tried these steps already
  • sshd_config no ttys
/etc/ssh/sshd_config:
Code:
Match User $serviceaccount
   PermitTTY no

This one actually does nothing except prevent a nice-looking terminal. The user still gets an interactive shell.

  • commands in ~/.authorized_keys
/home/serviceaccount/.ssh/authorized_keys:
Code:
command="/usr/local/bin/oneshellscripttorulethemall.sh" ssh-rsa AAAAAA....

Users can modify it, plus I cannot guarantee that every connection uses an ssh key.

  • altering default shell in /etc/passwd
/etc/passwd
Code:
serviceaccount:x:1500:1500:service account:/home/serviceaccount:/sbin/nologin

/sbin/nologin: prevents all logins, except "sudo -su $serviceaccount"
/bin/false: fails out entirely
/bin/true: does not allow any activity at all
custom wrapper script: A custom script that checks for "$@" and reacts to it might be my only choice and I will continue experimentation. But it could get weird for the local users who su $serviceaccount.


  • restrict logins from certain IPs (the other servers who are using the service account)
Users could just get a shell over there, and ssh in directly to an interactive shell.

In conclusion

I am interested in any and all attempts to meet the goals described above: Paid solutions, free solutions, hacky shell scripts, ssh config customization, custom default shells, wrapper scripts, etc. I would be pleased to see even partial answers, and I can bang away on adding the missing portions.


Is what I'm aiming for reasonable, or even possible?
# 2  
Looks unreasonably complex to implement yes, with requests for functionality overlapping.

Is there another approach for desired outcome ?
Perhaps some web server and actual application....

You will have many issues with implementing your entire functionality using one user and SSH protocol.
If you manage to do that in the end you will have a hacky mess.

Perhaps more service users with separated privileges.
Linux and unix systems are multi user environments in their essence, so exploit that as much as you can.

Hope that helps
Regards
Peasant.
# 3  
I started a possible tool to watch the logs and deal with shell sessions, but it can be easily defeated with a ssh remoteserver /bin/bash.
Code:
#!/bin/sh
# startdate: 2018-10-05 13:20
# Purpose: if a service account user logs in interactively, then kill it.
# incomplete. Can be foiled with: ssh -t clonetest210 /bin/bash
# improve: how to retrieve log entries to check

# Sample journalctl output.
# Oct 05 13:12:52 clonetest210 sshd[1868]: Starting session: shell on pts/3 for bgstack15-local from 10.200.18.240 port 59349 id 0

# Dependencies: sshd_config LogLevel VERBOSE
# journalctl -f -u sshd is not sufficient. I cannot tell what unit logs the notice seen above.

BADUSERS="(bgstack15-local|prophetess)"

journalctl -n100 | grep -oE "sshd\[.{1,10}\]: Starting session: shell on .* for ${BADUSERS} from .*" | awk '{print $1,$6,$8,$10}' | while read longpid tty tu srcip ;
do
   pid="$( echo "${longpid}" | tr -dc "[:digit:]" )"
   echo "Found login: ${tu} from pid ${pid} from ip ${srcip} and made terminal ${tty}"

   # investigate that current pid. if it exists and is sshd, kill it
   psout="$( ps -e -o pid:9,ppid:9,user:15,command:90 2>/dev/null | awk "\$1 == $pid" )"
   if test -n "${psout}" && echo "${psout}" | grep -qE "sshd:" ;
   then
      echo "need to warn user ${tu} on tty ${tty} and then kill pid ${pid}"
      printf "\n%s\n" "Interactive sessions are not allowed for user ${tu}." > "/dev/${tty}"
      sleep 0
      kill "${pid}"
   fi
done

Login or Register to Reply

|
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:
Advanced Search

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Procedure to restrict direct access as root
dio34
Hello, I would like to confirm whether the below procedure is correct. disabled direct super user access on AIX server using below procedure. Please let me know if there is any additional step. 1) confirm the access to HMC, console to reach the LPARs 2) chuser rlogin=false root ...... AIX
3
AIX
Can I restrict IP and AIX account at the same time?
nnnnnnine
Hi Everyone, I want to know is it possible, restrict user login to AIX by IP and user name? e.g. user alice can login to AIX (via ssh or telnet) from 192.168.1.100 user alice can not login to AIX (via ssh or telnet) from 172.16.1.100 user bob can not login to AIX (via ssh or telnet)...... AIX
6
AIX
Su-only account with ssh capability and no interactive login
naveendronavall
Hello experts, Is it possible to have an user account on RHEL 6.3 as a su-only account, but with ssh capability and no interactive login? Let me elaborate. Say, we have a cluster of 5 RHEL 6.3 servers and an user account (strmadmin) on each of the server as an su-only...... Red Hat
1
Red Hat
Direct/scsu access to unix account
runnerpaul
Hey Is there any way to differentiate if a user is logged directly into a UNIX functional account or if they have scsu'ed into the functional account? Cheers Paul... Solaris
2
Solaris
How to restrict account to one log-in?
Egroman
Our users have the tendency to use only one login account, to do their jobs. Obvious itīs a matter of training our users. But our internal audit team insists on restrictions from our system. So is there an option to restrict an account to only login once into the system? We use HP-UX 11.0. ...... UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
0
UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers