Ubuntu very slow after repartitioning


Login or Register to Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
# 8  
Old 10-31-2018
Hi,

I'm in agreement with Corona688, but a little research has shown this to be pretty common with Ubuntu 18.04 - it was there in the Beta and had been reported in some earlier releases as well (16.04 & 17.04).

There is a bug report here on the Ubuntu site, it covers the slow loading problem - although there is no direct match for your configuration. I would start with this and at least eliminate it.

Regards

Gull04
# 9  
Old 10-31-2018
We run Ubuntu 18.04 and have not seen any problem with delayed booting.

Code:
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:	Ubuntu
Description:	Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Release:	18.04
Codename:	bionic

However, we run as a server, not as a desktop with an external mouse, etc.
# 10  
Old 11-05-2018
i Already use a wireless mouse, so i don't think is ELON1200 the problem.
And before the repartitioning there are not those problems


p.s. Ubuntu is slow in opening and closing windows and programs, not in boot
# 11  
Old 11-06-2018
i try sudo fdisk -l and this is the result:


Code:
Disk /dev/loop0: 140,9 MiB, 147722240 bytes, 288520 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop1: 13 MiB, 13619200 bytes, 26600 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop2: 3,7 MiB, 3887104 bytes, 7592 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop3: 13 MiB, 13619200 bytes, 26600 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop4: 87,9 MiB, 92123136 bytes, 179928 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop5: 34,7 MiB, 36323328 bytes, 70944 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop6: 14,5 MiB, 15196160 bytes, 29680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop7: 87,9 MiB, 92114944 bytes, 179912 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 8EEDCE51-0DCE-418C-A610-F0D1971C55A8

Dispositivo     Start      Fine   Settori   Size Tipo
/dev/sda1        2048    534527    532480   260M EFI System
/dev/sda2      534528    567295     32768    16M Microsoft reserved
/dev/sda3      567296 248430591 247863296 118,2G Microsoft basic data
/dev/sda4   248430592 250068991   1638400   800M Windows recovery environment


Disk /dev/sdb: 931,5 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 2C00DF48-B76D-4C73-98C8-1257B1A72778

Dispositivo      Start       Fine    Settori   Size Tipo
/dev/sdb1           34     262177     262144   128M Microsoft reserved
/dev/sdb2       264192 1266728959 1266464768 603,9G Microsoft basic data
/dev/sdb3   1266728960 1267779583    1050624   513M EFI System
/dev/sdb4   1724446720 1953523711  229076992 109,2G Linux filesystem
/dev/sdb5   1267779584 1724446719  456667136 217,8G Linux filesystem

Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary.
Partition table entries are not in disk order.


Disk /dev/loop8: 2,3 MiB, 2433024 bytes, 4752 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop9: 140,7 MiB, 147496960 bytes, 288080 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop10: 2,3 MiB, 2355200 bytes, 4600 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop11: 14,5 MiB, 15208448 bytes, 29704 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop12: 42,1 MiB, 44183552 bytes, 86296 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop13: 13 MiB, 13619200 bytes, 26600 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop14: 2,3 MiB, 2355200 bytes, 4600 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop15: 86,9 MiB, 91099136 bytes, 177928 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop16: 3,7 MiB, 3878912 bytes, 7576 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


which is partition1? how i can resolve?
# 12  
Old 11-07-2018
Hi,

The partition 1 that fdisk is complaining about is /dev/sdb1 as to resolving the issue that it's reporting. Well I'm not sure that that is the issue, your system has two "Windows" disks "C: and D:" a 120Gb SSD and a 1Tb spinner?

The partition layout of the two disks doesn't seem to make sense, I'm assuming that the 1Tb disk has at some point had a Windows install on it and that you have resized the disk during the Ubuntu Installation process. Can you give a little history relating to the system here, how did you choose the size and then how did you add more space for Ubuntu?

Regards

Gull04
# 13  
Old 11-07-2018
i have hybrid hardware. 120 GB ssd and 1 TB hdd.
window is native on ssd. On hdd i partitioned a big part NFTS and the rest ext4 for install Ubuntu.

i install ubuntu with a root partition and a home partition. Swap partition is created automatically from ubuntu


when i repartitioned, after the ubuntu installation, i reduce the nfts part and increased the ext4. [---------NFTS-------][------ext4-----] ---> [--------NFTS-----][--------ext4-----]

Last edited by Marcov; 11-07-2018 at 07:05 PM..
Login or Register to Reply

|
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:
Advanced Search

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Ubuntu seems running slow! yifangt UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 11 12-02-2011 02:10 AM
Metaset repartitioning donaldfoo Solaris 0 10-21-2011 06:51 AM
[UBUNTU] mount.nfs fails in Ubuntu / Works on Red Hat!!! alan Ubuntu 2 08-16-2010 02:00 PM
Ubuntu / Ubuntu File Manager / Config drewk Ubuntu 6 04-28-2010 12:56 PM
formating and repartitioning an external hard drives seyiisq Solaris 2 05-18-2009 08:22 AM
Would like to install x86 desktop Ubuntu over AMD64 Ubuntu server docflyboy UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 0 02-20-2009 09:58 PM
Resizing and repartitioning NTFS with gParted? koppe UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 1 11-26-2008 11:40 AM
Repartitioning hard drive on Solaris10 pn8830 Solaris 1 11-18-2008 05:07 PM
Repartitioning scsi drive in Nextstep Mace Filesystems, Disks and Memory 3 11-21-2003 11:57 AM
repartitioning cmh UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 4 02-12-2002 04:00 AM