Login or Register to Ask a Question and Join Our Community


Solaris

Sun cluster v3.2 - Is this right?

Login to Discuss or Reply to this Discussion in Our Community

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris Sun cluster v3.2 - Is this right?
# 1  
Old 07-31-2018
Sun cluster v3.2 - Is this right?
Running Sun Cluster v3.2 it appears. Two clustered physcial servers both running Solaris 10.

Both servers run a number of Oracle DBs etc. BUT I'm a bit concerned that its been set up but will never switch in the even of failure of one of the hosts?

Some of the cluster groups we've disabled (migrated to new servers). BUT noticed that only CHD-RG and WCKNO-RG have both servers listed?
Are both nodes supposed to be configured for these cluster groups? If, for example, server DAT-PL2 failed, then COGNOS10-RG would not switch because DAT-SL2 is not listed?

Config is as follows:-

Code:
# clrg status
 
=== Cluster Resource Groups ===
 
Group Name           Node Name     Suspended    Status
----------           ---------     ---------    ------
listener-p-rg        dat-pl2    No           Online
 
listener-s-rg        dat-sl2    No           Online
 
chprd-rg             dat-pl2    No           Online
 
vses-rg              dat-pl2    No           Online
 
vprd-rg              dat-sl2    No           Online
 
wckprd-rg            dat-sl2    No           Online
 
listener2-p-rg       dat-pl2    No           Online
 
listener2-s-rg       dat-sl2    No           Online
 
wckno-rg             dat-pl2    No           Offline
                          dat-sl2    No           Online
 
listenerWCK-p-rg     dat-pl2    No           Online
 
listenerEWF-p-rg     dat-pl2    No           Online
 
listenerEWF-s-rg     dat-sl2    No           Online
 
listenerWCK-s-rg     dat-sl2    No           Online
 
cognos10-rg          dat-pl2    No           Online
 
listenerXML-s-rg     dat-sl2    No           Online
 
listenerXML-p-rg     dat-pl2    No           Online
 
listenerFES-p-rg     dat-pl2    No           Online
 
listenerFES-s-rg     dat-sl2    No           Online
 
e5fin-rg             dat-sl2    No           Unmanaged
 
e5archive-rg         dat-sl2    No           Unmanaged
 
fes-rg               dat-sl2    No           Unmanaged
 
chd-rg               dat-pl2    No           Unmanaged
                     dat-sl2    No           Unmanaged

Last edited by Corona688; 07-31-2018 at 12:22 PM.. Reason: code tags
# 2  
Old 07-31-2018
Please use code tags, as required by rules.
After 100 posts on these forums this should be endorsed while posting.

As for your question, if a resource group is in Online state, the package will fail over upon host failure, if quorum is met and the resource group has remaining node(s) in its configuration.
Can you post output in code tags of : clrg show cognos10-rg

Unmanaged state will do nothing, this means that the package is configured (probably, i can only guess without further inspection) but is not managed by cluster.
So, host failures or anything will not effect those in a cluster sense.

Best is, after migration to clean the old resources and resource groups from cluster, and old devices files from operating system.

Also, good practice is to trying to failover a package before going live Smilie
Otherwise inspect the system logs, and see if those packages failovered in the past, giving you further clues.

Hope that helps.
Regards
Peasant.
This User Gave Thanks to Peasant For This Post:
psychocandy
# 3  
Old 08-02-2018
Code:
#clrg show cognos10-rg

=== Resource Groups and Resources ===

Resource Group:                                 cognos10-rg
  RG_description:                                  <NULL>
  RG_mode:                                         Failover
  RG_state:                                        Managed
  Failback:                                        False
  Nodelist:                                        dat-pl2

  --- Resources for Group cognos10-rg ---

  Resource:                                     cognos10-hastorageplus-res
    Type:                                          SUNW.HAStoragePlus:8
    Type_version:                                  8
    Group:                                         cognos10-rg
    R_description:
    Resource_project_name:                         default
    Enabled{chpdat-pl2}:                           True
    Monitored{chpdat-pl2}:                         True

  Resource:                                     cognos10-hafoip1-res
    Type:                                          SUNW.LogicalHostname:3
    Type_version:                                  3
    Group:                                         cognos10-rg
    R_description:
    Resource_project_name:                         default
    Enabled{chpdat-pl2}:                           True
    Monitored{chpdat-pl2}:                         True

# 4  
Old 08-02-2018
Only one that will failover is wckno-rg
Now with code tags i noticed.

So this is well, quite broken and/or misconfigured Smilie

Regards
Peasant.
This User Gave Thanks to Peasant For This Post:
psychocandy
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Sun cluster 4.0 - zone cluster failover doubt

Hello experts - I am planning to install a Sun cluster 4.0 zone cluster fail-over. few basic doubts. (1) Where should i install the cluster s/w binaries ?. ( global zone or the container zone where i am planning to install the zone fail-over) (2) Or should i perform the installation on... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: NVA
0 Replies

2. Solaris

Sun cluster

Any body can tell me where i can download sun cluster installation and configuration video. is there any option to install cluster in 32 bit virtual machine. please help (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: sunnybee
4 Replies

3. Solaris

Sun cluster 3.1

Hi, I have upgraded a Sparc T2000 server which is node 2, in a Sun Cluster 3.1 two node cluster from Solaris 10 Update 2, to 10 Update 7. This is a requirement for a NetApps solution as we currently have a Sun 3510 SAN. I am at a stage where I believe the two nodes will not communicate over the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: zetex
0 Replies

4. Solaris

Sun cluster 3.2

Hi I have a new mount point which is to added to to an existing resource group. I read many docs but I am not able to find the exact methods. Could anyone help me pls. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ningy
1 Replies

5. Solaris

Sun cluster and Veritas cluster question.

Yesterday my customer told me to expect a vcs upgrade to happen in the future. He also plans to stop using HDS and move to EMC. Am thinking how to migrate to sun cluster setup instead. My plan as follows leave the existing vcs intact as a fallback plan. Then install and build suncluster on... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: sparcguy
5 Replies

6. Solaris

Sun Cluster

Hi All I hav working knowledge on solarois 10. Could anyone suggest me any doc or material for learning SUN cluster from scratch. Anything from basic level . Thanks in advance!! (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ningy
1 Replies

7. Solaris

Sun Cluster 3.2

Hi, I am getting these messages constantly at random times there is not visible impact but would like to know what these messages mean? Cluster.RGM.rgmd: resource group on node change to RG_ON_PENDING_R_RERT Cluster.RGM.rgmd: resource group on node change to RG_ONLINE (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: xor
1 Replies

8. Solaris

sun cluster

hi can u please send me how to configure cluster in x86 machines. i am using VM ware. Is there any difference in X86 and SPARC cluster installations please help me thaks to all (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sijocg
1 Replies

9. High Performance Computing

SUN Cluster Vs Veritas Cluster

Dear All, Can anyone explain about Pros and Cons of SUN and Veritas Cluster ? Any comparison chart is highly appreciated. Regards, RAA (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: RAA
4 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question