hello,
We are using Solaris 11.3 on SPARC T5-2. The below is the actual output from "zpool status" command. The disks were scrubed last week, but it says the scrub repaired on Dec 31, 1969.
Does anyone know how to correct this to report the correct date?
Thanks
Code:
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 25m24s with 0 errors on Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1d2s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
pool: u02
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 21m44s with 0 errors on Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
u02 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1d1s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1d3s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
It looks like scrub cleared the counts and cleared the timestamp. Note that in the US Eastern timezone, the local time corresponding to the UNIX Epoch -- which is the time with timestamp 0 (midnight at the start of January 1, 1970 GMT) is Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 EST.
zpool scrub/resilver timestamp is incorrect on SPARC systems running Solaris 11.3 (Doc ID 2131291.1)
Notice that this bug does not affect your system in any other way other then wrong display of timestamp in zpool commands.
You should update your system to Oracle Solaris 11.3.4.5.0 or greater.
Probably followed by a zpool upgrade for those pools (i cannot find info if that step is also required).
Notice that if you upgrade your rpool and pools, you will not be able to rollback to older release(s) via beadm.
Get your current release to verify :
Code:
pkg info entire
Execute that command on both hypervisor and LDOM.
Check out my oracle website for bug identification, workarounds and such.
You'll need an account and support for that server (to download patches as well).
SOLARIS 9 Zone :
date command in crontab shows delayed(One Hour) output
Hi folks,
the date command shows the correct date and time, How ever, if the date command executed through crontab in any form of scrip the output shows as one hour delayed, similar to date -u..
Can some one help in... (12 Replies)
Hi all,
I've been working on a script to run a disk wipe (using Jim Garlick's scrub tool) on the filesystem in Xerox production printer RIPs.
Easy enough if there's just one partition, but I need to cater for the possibility of multiple drives/partitions, and either ZFS or UFS (don't know if... (2 Replies)
I have a file that looks like:
file1:
www_blank_com 20121008153552
www_blank_com 20121008162542
www_blank_com 20121009040540
www_blank_com 20121009041542
www_blank_com 20121010113548
www_blank_com 20121011113551
www_blank_com 20121012113542
I want the new file to show the day of... (3 Replies)
Hi,
I've gone around with this on Oracle's site (and tech support) and ended up empty handed and without ideas of what to do to fix the problem.
Background:
V245, Solaris 10, has 2 12-disk infortrend RAIDs attached.
Have replaced faulty disks many times - familiar with the routine. However,... (5 Replies)
Here is the error showing in the XCSF, can anyone recommend further diagnosis for this specific error?;
XSCF> showhardconf
SPARC Enterprise M3000;
+ Serial:PX61142029; Operator_Panel_Switch:Locked;
+ Power_Supply_System:Single; SCF-ID:XSCF#0;
+ System_Power:On;... (4 Replies)
# zpool status -v
pool: pool1
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
entire pool from backup.
see:... (0 Replies)
Hello,
I am trying to show today's date and time in a better format than ‘date' (Using positional parameters). I found a command mktime and am wondering if this is the best command to use or will this also show me the time elapse since 1/30/70? Any help would be greatly appreciated, Thanks... (3 Replies)
when I do a tape status /dev/rStp0 I get the following on a new tape and I have tried several:
Status : ready beginning-of-tape
soft errors : 0
hard errors: 2
underruns: 5
My BackupEdge has stopped backing up my system because it asks for a new volume yet my total system data is under 20... (5 Replies)
