Today (Saturday) We will make some minor tuning adjustments to MySQL.

You may experience 2 up to 10 seconds "glitch time" when we restart MySQL. We expect to make these adjustments around 1AM Eastern Daylight Saving Time (EDT) US.

Solaris 10 NFS Share Issue

Login or Register to Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
# 1  
Solaris 10 NFS Share Issue

Hello all,

I am having an issue with an NFS share I have created between two Solaris 10 boxes. I want the share to have read/write permissions, but for some reason it is coming up as read-only on the client side mount despite "rw" being specified in the mount options.

Here is what I have in /etc/vfstab on the client:

server:/share - /share nfs - yes rw

Here is what I have in /etc/dfs/dfstab on the server:

share -F nfs -o rw,root=clientservername /share

The problem appears to be with the client-side mount, because if I perform the following command it becomes read-write:

mount -o remount /share

Any ideas why the share started out as read-only despite being specified otherwise? Any help is greatly appreciated!


# 2  
Please post the /share directory permissions on the server.

Who is the owner?

(Could try setting to 777 and see if the problem goes away)
# 3  
The owner is root and the permissions are currently 755, but I currently have read/write after performing the remount option. I am troubleshooting this on a production server, so I have not had a chance to reboot the server to see if it reverts to read-only (I suspect it will since it started out that way), but when I do I will give 777 a shot.


# 4  
Unfortunately I tried setting the permissions to 777, but it still comes up as read-only initially. So everytime the system reboots or the NFS client service is comes up as read-only and I have to use the remount command to fix it. I also tried forcing NFSv4 just to see if that changes anything, but no change.

I just find it odd that the remount command is supposed to mount an already mounted share adding in the "rw" option even though I already mounted it with the rw option in the first place.


# 5  
I agree that this is weird, especially since I do this all the time between Solaris 10 boxes with no issues. I appreciate that doesn't help you.

Having looked at how I configure mine, I notice one major difference:

Here is what I have in /etc/vfstab on the client:

server:/share - /share nfs - yes rw

In vfstab on clients I always use:

server:/share - /share nfs - yes rw,soft

for soft not hard (default) mount

Other than that I can't spot any differences.

Perhaps cut and post the actual vfstab and dfstab contents in case I can see a syntax error or the like.

I confgure dfstab on the server side as you are doing it.

I admit that I am confused.

Last edited by hicksd8; 01-24-2013 at 06:14 PM..
# 6  
Weird. Try mounting with "-o vers=3,proto=tcp" and see what happens.

And don't use soft mounts. Soft mounts do not support mmap'd files because once a file is mmap'd, the system assumes any pages needed can be read/written as necessary and there is no way to tell a running application otherwise. This can lead to processes crashing with SEGV/SIGBUS and/or data corruption. Also, writes cached on the client can be lost if the IO attempt times out after the application received a successful return from its write() call, which can also lead to data corruption. Never mind the fact that you're assuming all applications will properly handle possible intermittent IO errors any reads/writes. If they don't - data corruption.

IMO, if you know you're never going to have mmap'd files (and executables - applications and shared objects - are all mmap'd when they are run...) and ALL the apps running on your system are known to properly handle intermittent IO errors soft mounts are OK.
This User Gave Thanks to achenle For This Post:
# 7  
Another thought on this issue..........

On your server can you

ping <clientname>

just to check that the client name can be resolved. Does it translate to the correct ip address of the client?

If ping cannot resolve the name then neither will the share command and the server will not recognise the inbound nfs mount request as a node it should give rw,root access to. A read-only access might result (I guess).
Login or Register to Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:
Advanced Search

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Default route issue in share local zone in Solaris 11

Hi We took the reboot of server/global zone after that Solaris 11 share local zone not able to ping the default gateway but global zone able to ping same default gateway. I check/compare the before activity logs of global zone and local zones which looks fine to me, further IP and netmask of... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: sb200
6 Replies

2. Solaris

Solaris 10 NFS client cannot mount a share from a Windows server

I have a Solaris 10 server, I'm trying to mount a share from a Windows nfs server. If I add this entry (tst-walnut:/test_sap_nfs - /majid nfs - yes rw,soft) to my /etc/vfstab, then I can mount, but when I create a file by root:root, the file owner changes to... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Hiroshi
1 Replies

3. Solaris

RHEL NFS share on Solaris 11.3 vers=4

NFS server: RHEL:6 /nfsdb,sync,no_root_squash),sync,no_root_squash) Client: Solaris 11.3 vfstab entry : - /archive_data nfs - yes rw,soft,vers=4 # ls -ld /archive_data drwxr-xr-x 4 root root... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Shirishlnx
3 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Mount NFS Share On NFS Client via bash script.

I need a help of good people with effective bash script to mount nfs shared, By the way I did the searches, since i haven't found that someone wrote a script like this in the past, I'm sure it will serve more people. The scenario as follow: An NFS Client with Daily CRON , running bash script... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Brian.t
4 Replies

5. Solaris

Mounting 2012R2 NFS Share on Solaris 10

Hi all, new here. I'm attempting to mount an NFS share I've created on a 2012r2 esx VM on my solaris 10 vm, I'm using the following command: mount 2012box:/sharename /mnt and I get the following result: nfs mount: mount: /mnt: Operation not supported Both vms can ping one... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Meshuggener
3 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

NFS : Invalid argument (Remote share mounting issue)

Hi Guru's, I am unable to mount NFS share on unix system (DG/UX) which is nfs client. Error: mount: /nfsshare: Invalid argument mount: giving up on: /mountpoint i tried following command mount -t nfs remotehost:/nfsshare /mountpoint Error: (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Justin John
5 Replies

7. Red Hat

Unable to access NFS share on Solaris Server from Linux client

Hi, I am trying to access a NFS shared directory on Solaris 10 Server from a client which is RHEL 4 Server. On the NFS Server, in /etc/dfs/, I added following line to dfstab file. share -F nfs -o rw /var/share & then ran the following svcadm -v enable -r... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: SunilB2011
3 Replies

8. Solaris

Can't access NFS Share on Solaris Server from a Linux Client

Hi, I am trying to access a NFS shared directory on Solaris 10 Server from a client which is RHEL 4 Server. On the NFS Server, in /etc/dfs/, I added following line to dfstab file. & then ran the following On the client machine, while running the mount command, I am... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: SunilB2011
0 Replies

9. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

VxWorks - W2003 issue loading file from NFS share

We recently replaced an existing Windows Server 2000 with a Windows Server 2003. The server‘s primary function is file/print in our development environment. One of the directories is shared using NFS. All compiled software is kept in this share (we use C & C++). The generated “.out” and “.ndb”... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: BigBuff52
0 Replies

10. Solaris

how to mount Windows NFS share on solaris

Hi, How can i mount an NFS share on a solaris machine a filesystem ? I have enabled nfs on a windows server and the shares has given read/write access to it to all the users. I would like to mount it on around 10 different solaris boxes with different versions of solaris. Thanks in advance. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: uxadmin007
2 Replies

Featured Tech Videos