I am using the ce interface on my Solaris 9 server and there is significant packet loss when transmitting large packets. Does anyone have a fix for this?
have you patched the machine with some newer patch cluster? i remember some problems with ce interfaces which are fixed by patches... also check the cabel and the switch port settings... if this is a new problem and not something that was always there, a hardware problem might be more likely.
I've installed the 9_Recommended patch cluster and the problem still persists. This has been a problem for a few months. I will check out the Oracle website to see if there is anything there regarding a patch.
Beware that forced configurations like the one suggested are a very common root cause of networking issues and are only advised if you are sure there won't be a mismatch risk with the other connected end. Resetting to the default, i.e. auto-negotiation, is almost always a safe bet. Unless you are using old routers/switches with bogus firmwares, there should be no need to force the speed or the duplex mode.
The settings of the interface are below. These settings are forced. When I use auto-neg the speed of the interface drops to 10 half duplex even though it should auto-neg to 1000 full, so I can't use auto-neg. We don't know why this happens either.
RHEL 7.0, IPV6
Scenario:
I have routed specific network using network scripts.
1. "ip -6 route show" shows that route has been added. ( with metric 1024)
2. Ping of the specific IP through that route is successful.
3. Now after few days, for some reason, we see that cache route appears for... (3 Replies)
I have a RHEL 5 system with a bonded interface configure using only one network port (eth0). So I have config file for ifcfg-bond0 and ifcfg-eth. I'd like to configure eth5 to be the second SLAVE in the bond. My question is, after I modify ifcfg-eth5, can I add eth5 to the bond0 interface without... (1 Reply)
This is my situation
DOS pc serial cable (sl0) Linux Pc eth1
192.168.0.10 <-------------------->192.168.0.2 <------------>192.168.0.1 (router)
I connected the linux pc and the dos pc with a SLIP (serial line internet protocol), so they can communicate in the sl0 interface.
... (3 Replies)
Hi all
I have installed a demo version of SCO OpenServer 5.0.2, I finally found it is Desktop Interface, I would like to know how to change its interface to dos based interface?
If you have any ideas, please tell me then. Thank you (2 Replies)
Dear all,
I am a newbie in solaris and I need your advice.
I have a Solaris version 5.9 installed on Sunfire V240.
I am able to ssh the machine from putty remotely.
My problem is that I cannot see the display from KVM switch I have connected to it. I need also to be able to see the GUI... (2 Replies)
Hello,
I'm writing to you because I encountered the following problem. My program displayes all network interfaces that are available in the system, but I would like to add a functionality in which a user can enter a destination address IP (ex. the IP address of the Google search engine) and will... (1 Reply)
I have 4 network ports on our T5240 sun server.
all but 1 gives packet losses (nxge1)
nxge0 gives on average 50% packet loss, very bad.
nxge2 gives on average 1-2% packet loss.
nxge3 gives on average 20% packet loss.
Is there a tool or something to help me find the problem? (11 Replies)
I am experiencing a problem where under a dial condition I am experiencing packet loss, which is failrly normal, but the response to the packet loss is taking bewteen 6 and 10 seconds. Could someone please advise what the industry standard is on the response time under a packet loss senario. (1 Reply)
01-05-2011
