A query on Disk naming conventions in Solaris.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris A query on Disk naming conventions in Solaris.
# 1  
Old 04-23-2009
A query on Disk naming conventions in Solaris.

These are findings by me with my little experience with Solaris 10. Please correct me if wrong..
In x86 systems with ide hard disk:

c= controller
d=disk
s=slice

1.Here controller c0 means the primary ide controller ide0.
controller c1 means the secondary ide controller ide1.
controller c2 means the external drives such as usb drive.
3.c0d0 = disk connected as primary master.
c0d1=disk connected as primary slave.
c1d0= disk connected as secondary slave.
c1 d1= disk connected as secondary slave.
4.s means the slices (partitions) we create in d0, d1, d2, or d3.

For eg. the primary master hard disk's 5 th slice will be:
c0d0s5
the secondary slave hard disk's 6th slice will be:
c1d1s6

Usually, in x86, the target number is not specified. I dont see an entry in /dev/dsk directory...( is it not?) . Not sure about this. Please clarify.

5.If you connect an external usb drive, it will be treated as:

c2t0d0p0. Am i correct?
# 2  
Old 04-23-2009
you're on the right track. however, i can't be certain of your usb format as every system is different regarding this.
# 3  
Old 04-23-2009
Thank u mr.pupp.
# 4  
Old 04-23-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by saagar

5.If you connect an external usb drive, it will be treated as:

c2t0d0p0. Am i correct?
Not really.
An usb disk isn't different from an internal IDE/SATA/SCSI disk regarding partition and slice terminology. The only specificity is IDE disks have no target (t0 here).
# 5  
Old 04-24-2009
Thank you mr.jlliagre.
# 6  
Old 04-24-2009
jlliagre - you're right. what i should have said was i can't be certain that usb is in fact c2t0d0p0 without being on that specific system. this is displayed differently from system to system.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Cybersecurity

Proper naming conventions

Hey guys, not sure should I post it here or in 'What is on Your Mind?' I'm discussing usage of DSL (domain specific language) in security tools with my colleagues. We haven't been able to reach an agreement over naming conventions. There are many tools using DSL: splunk, sumologic,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Tobby P
2 Replies

2. Solaris

Iscsi shared disk - same naming across server

Hi all, Is there anyway i can control the naming of the disk device ? I have added an iscsi disk on server1 using iscsiadm , devfsadm and it is now showing as /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 in node1 However, i am worried that the same disk will appear as /dev/dsk/cXtXd0 in node2 This iscsi disk(lun)... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: javanoob
0 Replies

3. Solaris

Convert from raw disk to solaris volume manager disk

I have a solaris 10 system configured using NetApp as its storage, and the file systems are already configured as you can see from the example below: root@moneta # df -h Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/md/dsk/d0 9.8G 513M 9.3G 6% /... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: fretagi
4 Replies

4. Solaris

Convert from raw disk to solaris volume manager disk

I have a solaris 10 system configured using NetApp as its storage, and the file systems are already configured as you can see from the example below: root@moneta # df -h Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/md/dsk/d0 9.8G 513M 9.3G 6% / ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: fretagi
0 Replies

5. Solaris

Query related to device naming of SATA

Friends, Could u please clarify how does a Solaris 10 machine recognize a SATA hard disk, SATA CD/DVD drives. Will it recognize it like a SCSI? eg.c0t0d0 or like ide ? eg.c0d0 thank u. (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: saagar
11 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Naming conventions for shared libraries in Linux

Hello, I'm wondering what is the naming conventions for *.so shared libraries in linux. For example, a library in /lib, say libcrypt-2.7.so has a symbolic link called libcrypt.so.1 pointing to it, yet libncursesw.so.5.6 has a symbolic link called libncursesw.so.5 pointing to it. What is the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: neked
2 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question