Search Results

Thanks. The problem is gcc fails to compile when : is in the LIBRARY_PATH and I reley heavily on automatic compilation tools.

The most common problem append to $PATH-like environment variables is:

export PATH=$PATH:/new/path/to/bin

The problem is if the PATH is empty you end up with:

:/new/path/to/bin

Is there...

There is no filesystem layout beside that Makefile. It downloads everything.

I've found the root of the problem with little help from here Unable to preserve hard links. Why? - Super User...

Oh /dev/full. This thread is not any help because everybody thinks that I've did something plainly stupid. I'm feeling like I've just called an IT support. :D

Please, before posting anything stop...

I have three methods that should work. Non of them is. I've just rerun the whole script from the scratch with tar method enabled and it does work as I want except preserving the hardlinks.


$ ls...

Guys, I know how it should work, but it ain't happening. Possibly due to the fact that the source filesystem is RO cloop device based.

You may want to copy a Makefile, run make changes yourself...

Hi,

I'm trying to create a Makefile that would automate remastering Knoppix distribution.

As a part of the process I am mounting using linux cloop device a compressed filesystem and copy the...

Post deleted. Sorry.

Have you identifie the botleneck already? Is the CPU used for 100%? Where is the backup stored? On a separate disk?

Well. You will have a cronjob that will sync two folders using rsync ... .

You can write a timestamp of each file to some temporary place. Or sha256 hashes. Next round you compare this and if this...

Can't you just rsync everything with cronjob?

I don't get this.

I can't see the way actually that the server could prevent the client from saving a password. If you use password and it's the same password each time I can't see a way to know...

It is indeed. :)

if [ -z "`echo "$VARIABLE" | tr -d '\n'`" ]; then
...
fi


Is this what you mean?

Well. Makes sense. However I wouldn't create any security mechanisms based on the timestamps of the files. The file for which you've given someone write permission can't be trusted, period. I now...

Put everything in quotes. "" is a blank.

I understand chmod and chown rules. However I can't find a reason for requiring ownership for modifing a timestamp. I'd be happy to see one.

Just use it with or without exclamation mark. It's just a negation.

For the rest of the filesystem operations you have to have write permissions only. You don't have to be the owner. I don't quite see the reason why modifying a timestamp is diffrent.

"Also"? So you have to be both owner and have write permissions? This seems ... a wrong design.

Please correct my if I'm wrong, but you've posted a screenshot, pasted in a Microsoft Office document on a Unix forum?!

There is something that you forgot to close (matching bracket, if/then/fi, while/do etc.).

Use a "bash -x" or "sh -x" to diagnose how exactly is your program running and use a good text editor...

Depending on the fractional resolution you require you can scale up all the numbers and use the fixed-point arithmetics. Other than this - it's not possible to have FP in shell as FP instructions are...

Strange. It work for me.

Can you describe me what are the results? Any output printed maybe? Have any file changed? Can you see if timestamps for the files are being uploaded?

TonyFullerMalv is right. You should be able to do so. Try touching non-existing file in the same dir first. This have to work as well. I can't see any other reason for this not working other than...