Query: getustack
OS: sunos
Section: 2
Format: Original Unix Latex Style Formatted with HTML and a Horizontal Scroll Bar
getustack(2) System Calls getustack(2)NAMEgetustack, setustack - retrieve or change the address of per-LWP stack boundary informationSYNOPSIS#include <ucontext.h> int getustack(stack_t **spp); int setustack(stack_t *sp);DESCRIPTIONThe getustack() function retrieves the address of per-LWP stack boundary information. The address is stored at the location pointed to by spp. If this address has not been defined using a previous call to setustack(), NULL is stored at the location pointed to by spp. The setustack() function changes the address of the current thread's stack boundary information to the value of sp.RETURN VALUESUpon successful completion, these functions return 0. Otherwise, -1 is returned and errno is set to indicate the error.ERRORSThese functions will fail if: EFAULT The spp or sp argument does not refer to a valid address.USAGEOnly implementors of custom threading libraries should use these functions to get and set the address of the stack bound to an internal per-thread data structure. Other users should use stack_getbounds(3C) and stack_setbounds(3C).ATTRIBUTESSee attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Interface Stability | Evolving | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |MT-Level | Async-Signal-Safe | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+SEE ALSO_stack_grow(3C), stack_getbounds(3C), stack_inbounds(3C), stack_setbounds(3C), stack_violation(3C), attributes(5) SunOS 5.10 2 Nov 2004 getustack(2)
Related Man Pages |
---|
sigaltstack(2) - opensolaris |
pthread_attr_setstack(3c) - opensolaris |
stack_violation(3c) - opensolaris |
thr_stksegment(3c) - sunos |
getsockname(3xnet) - sunos |
Similar Topics in the Unix Linux Community |
---|
truss: script runs without, but 'sysntax err' with it ?! |