👤
Home Man
Search
Today's Posts
Register

Linux & Unix Commands - Search Man Pages
Man Page or Keyword Search:
Select Section of Man Page:
Select Man Page Repository:

RedHat 9 (Linux i386) - man page for test::tutorial (redhat section 3pm)

Test::Tutorial(3pm)		 Perl Programmers Reference Guide	      Test::Tutorial(3pm)

NAME
       Test::Tutorial - A tutorial about writing really basic tests

DESCRIPTION
       AHHHHHHH!!!!  NOT TESTING!  Anything but testing!  Beat me, whip me, send me to Detroit,
       but don't make me write tests!

       *sob*

       Besides, I don't know how to write the damned things.

       Is this you?  Is writing tests right up there with writing documentation and having your
       fingernails pulled out?	Did you open up a test and read

	   ######## We start with some black magic

       and decide that's quite enough for you?

       It's ok.  That's all gone now.  We've done all the black magic for you.	And here are the
       tricks...

       Nuts and bolts of testing.

       Here's the most basic test program.

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -w

	   print "1..1\n";

	   print 1 + 1 == 2 ? "ok 1\n" : "not ok 1\n";

       since 1 + 1 is 2, it prints:

	   1..1
	   ok 1

       What this says is: 1..1 "I'm going to run one test." [1] "ok 1" "The first test passed".
       And that's about all magic there is to testing.	Your basic unit of testing is the ok.
       For each thing you test, an "ok" is printed.  Simple.  Test::Harness interprets your test
       results to determine if you succeeded or failed (more on that later).

       Writing all these print statements rapidly gets tedious.  Fortunately, there's Test::Sim-
       ple.  It has one function, "ok()".

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -w

	   use Test::Simple tests => 1;

	   ok( 1 + 1 == 2 );

       and that does the same thing as the code above.	"ok()" is the backbone of Perl testing,
       and we'll be using it instead of roll-your-own from here on.  If "ok()" gets a true value,
       the test passes.  False, it fails.

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -w

	   use Test::Simple tests => 2;
	   ok( 1 + 1 == 2 );
	   ok( 2 + 2 == 5 );

       from that comes

	   1..2
	   ok 1
	   not ok 2
	   #	 Failed test (test.pl at line 5)
	   # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 2.

       1..2 "I'm going to run two tests."  This number is used to ensure your test program ran
       all the way through and didn't die or skip some tests.  "ok 1" "The first test passed."
       "not ok 2" "The second test failed".  Test::Simple helpfully prints out some extra commen-
       tary about your tests.

       It's not scary.	Come, hold my hand.  We're going to give an example of testing a module.
       For our example, we'll be testing a date library, Date::ICal.  It's on CPAN, so download a
       copy and follow along. [2]

       Where to start?

       This is the hardest part of testing, where do you start?  People often get overwhelmed at
       the apparent enormity of the task of testing a whole module.  Best place to start is at
       the beginning.  Date::ICal is an object-oriented module, and that means you start by mak-
       ing an object.  So we test "new()".

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -w

	   use Test::Simple tests => 2;

	   use Date::ICal;

	   my $ical = Date::ICal->new;	       # create an object
	   ok( defined $ical ); 	       # check that we got something
	   ok( $ical->isa('Date::ICal') );     # and it's the right class

       run that and you should get:

	   1..2
	   ok 1
	   ok 2

       congratulations, you've written your first useful test.

       Names

       That output isn't terribly descriptive, is it?  When you have two tests you can figure out
       which one is #2, but what if you have 102?

       Each test can be given a little descriptive name as the second argument to "ok()".

	   use Test::Simple tests => 2;

	   ok( defined $ical,		   'new() returned something' );
	   ok( $ical->isa('Date::ICal'),   "  and it's the right class" );

       So now you'd see...

	   1..2
	   ok 1 - new() returned something
	   ok 2 -   and it's the right class

       Test the manual

       Simplest way to build up a decent testing suite is to just test what the manual says it
       does. [3] Let's pull something out of the "SYNOPSIS" in Date::ICal and test that all its
       bits work.

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -w

	   use Test::Simple tests => 8;

	   use Date::ICal;

	   $ical = Date::ICal->new( year => 1964, month => 10, day => 16,
				    hour => 16, min => 12, sec => 47,
				    tz => '0530' );

	   ok( defined $ical,		 'new() returned something' );
	   ok( $ical->isa('Date::ICal'), "  and it's the right class" );
	   ok( $ical->sec   == 47,	 '  sec()'   );
	   ok( $ical->min   == 12,	 '  min()'   );
	   ok( $ical->hour  == 16,	 '  hour()'  );
	   ok( $ical->day   == 17,	 '  day()'   );
	   ok( $ical->month == 10,	 '  month()' );
	   ok( $ical->year  == 1964,	 '  year()'  );

       run that and you get:

	   1..8
	   ok 1 - new() returned something
	   ok 2 -   and it's the right class
	   ok 3 -   sec()
	   ok 4 -   min()
	   ok 5 -   hour()
	   not ok 6 -	day()
	   #	 Failed test (- at line 16)
	   ok 7 -   month()
	   ok 8 -   year()
	   # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 8.

       Whoops, a failure! [4] Test::Simple helpfully lets us know on what line the failure
       occured, but not much else.  We were supposed to get 17, but we didn't.	What did we get??
       Dunno.  We'll have to re-run the test in the debugger or throw in some print statements to
       find out.

       Instead, we'll switch from Test::Simple to Test::More.  Test::More does everything
       Test::Simple does, and more!  In fact, Test::More does things exactly the way Test::Simple
       does.  You can literally swap Test::Simple out and put Test::More in its place.	That's
       just what we're going to do.

       Test::More does more than Test::Simple.	The most important difference at this point is it
       provides more informative ways to say "ok".  Although you can write almost any test with a
       generic "ok()", it can't tell you what went wrong.  Instead, we'll use the "is()" func-
       tion, which lets us declare that something is supposed to be the same as something else:

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -w

	   use Test::More tests => 8;

	   use Date::ICal;

	   $ical = Date::ICal->new( year => 1964, month => 10, day => 16,
				    hour => 16, min => 12, sec => 47,
				    tz => '0530' );

	   ok( defined $ical,		 'new() returned something' );
	   ok( $ical->isa('Date::ICal'), "  and it's the right class" );
	   is( $ical->sec,     47,	 '  sec()'   );
	   is( $ical->min,     12,	 '  min()'   );
	   is( $ical->hour,    16,	 '  hour()'  );
	   is( $ical->day,     17,	 '  day()'   );
	   is( $ical->month,   10,	 '  month()' );
	   is( $ical->year,    1964,	 '  year()'  );

       "Is "$ical->sec" 47?"  "Is "$ical->min" 12?"  With "is()" in place, you get some more
       information

	   1..8
	   ok 1 - new() returned something
	   ok 2 -   and it's the right class
	   ok 3 -   sec()
	   ok 4 -   min()
	   ok 5 -   hour()
	   not ok 6 -	day()
	   #	 Failed test (- at line 16)
	   #	      got: '16'
	   #	 expected: '17'
	   ok 7 -   month()
	   ok 8 -   year()
	   # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 8.

       letting us know that "$ical->day" returned 16, but we expected 17.  A quick check shows
       that the code is working fine, we made a mistake when writing up the tests.  Just change
       it to:

	   is( $ical->day,     16,	 '  day()'   );

       and everything works.

       So any time you're doing a "this equals that" sort of test, use "is()".	It even works on
       arrays.	The test is always in scalar context, so you can test how many elements are in a
       list this way. [5]

	   is( @foo, 5, 'foo has 5 elements' );

       Sometimes the tests are wrong

       Which brings us to a very important lesson.  Code has bugs.  Tests are code.  Ergo, tests
       have bugs.  A failing test could mean a bug in the code, but don't discount the possibil-
       ity that the test is wrong.

       On the flip side, don't be tempted to prematurely declare a test incorrect just because
       you're having trouble finding the bug.  Invalidating a test isn't something to be taken
       lightly, and don't use it as a cop out to avoid work.

       Testing lots of values

       We're going to be wanting to test a lot of dates here, trying to trick the code with lots
       of different edge cases.  Does it work before 1970?  After 2038?  Before 1904?  Do years
       after 10,000 give it trouble?  Does it get leap years right?  We could keep repeating the
       code above, or we could set up a little try/expect loop.

	   use Test::More tests => 32;
	   use Date::ICal;

	   my %ICal_Dates = (
		   # An ICal string	And the year, month, date
		   #			hour, minute and second we expect.
		   '19971024T120000' =>    # from the docs.
				       [ 1997, 10, 24, 12,  0,	0 ],
		   '20390123T232832' =>    # after the Unix epoch
				       [ 2039,	1, 23, 23, 28, 32 ],
		   '19671225T000000' =>    # before the Unix epoch
				       [ 1967, 12, 25,	0,  0,	0 ],
		   '18990505T232323' =>    # before the MacOS epoch
				       [ 1899,	5,  5, 23, 23, 23 ],
	   );

	   while( my($ical_str, $expect) = each %ICal_Dates ) {
	       my $ical = Date::ICal->new( ical => $ical_str );

	       ok( defined $ical,	     "new(ical => '$ical_str')" );
	       ok( $ical->isa('Date::ICal'), "	and it's the right class" );

	       is( $ical->year,    $expect->[0],     '	year()'  );
	       is( $ical->month,   $expect->[1],     '	month()' );
	       is( $ical->day,	   $expect->[2],     '	day()'	 );
	       is( $ical->hour,    $expect->[3],     '	hour()'  );
	       is( $ical->min,	   $expect->[4],     '	min()'	 );
	       is( $ical->sec,	   $expect->[5],     '	sec()'	 );
	   }

       So now we can test bunches of dates by just adding them to %ICal_Dates.	Now that it's
       less work to test with more dates, you'll be inclined to just throw more in as you think
       of them.  Only problem is, every time we add to that we have to keep adjusting the "use
       Test::More tests => ##" line.  That can rapidly get annoying.  There's two ways to make
       this work better.

       First, we can calculate the plan dynamically using the "plan()" function.

	   use Test::More;
	   use Date::ICal;

	   my %ICal_Dates = (
	       ...same as before...
	   );

	   # For each key in the hash we're running 8 tests.
	   plan tests => keys %ICal_Dates * 8;

       Or to be even more flexible, we use "no_plan".  This means we're just running some tests,
       don't know how many. [6]

	   use Test::More 'no_plan';   # instead of tests => 32

       now we can just add tests and not have to do all sorts of math to figure out how many
       we're running.

       Informative names

       Take a look at this line here

	   ok( defined $ical,		 "new(ical => '$ical_str')" );

       we've added more detail about what we're testing and the ICal string itself we're trying
       out to the name.  So you get results like:

	   ok 25 - new(ical => '19971024T120000')
	   ok 26 -   and it's the right class
	   ok 27 -   year()
	   ok 28 -   month()
	   ok 29 -   day()
	   ok 30 -   hour()
	   ok 31 -   min()
	   ok 32 -   sec()

       if something in there fails, you'll know which one it was and that will make tracking down
       the problem easier.  So try to put a bit of debugging information into the test names.

       Describe what the tests test, to make debugging a failed test easier for you or for the
       next person who runs your test.

       Skipping tests

       Poking around in the existing Date::ICal tests, I found this in t/01sanity.t [7]

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -w

	   use Test::More tests => 7;
	   use Date::ICal;

	   # Make sure epoch time is being handled sanely.
	   my $t1 = Date::ICal->new( epoch => 0 );
	   is( $t1->epoch, 0,	       "Epoch time of 0" );

	   # XXX This will only work on unix systems.
	   is( $t1->ical, '19700101Z', "  epoch to ical" );

	   is( $t1->year,  1970,       "  year()"  );
	   is( $t1->month, 1,	       "  month()" );
	   is( $t1->day,   1,	       "  day()"   );

	   # like the tests above, but starting with ical instead of epoch
	   my $t2 = Date::ICal->new( ical => '19700101Z' );
	   is( $t2->ical, '19700101Z', "Start of epoch in ICal notation" );

	   is( $t2->epoch, 0,	       "  and back to ICal" );

       The beginning of the epoch is different on most non-Unix operating systems [8].	Even
       though Perl smooths out the differences for the most part, certain ports do it differ-
       ently.  MacPerl is one off the top of my head. [9] We know this will never work on MacOS.
       So rather than just putting a comment in the test, we can explicitly say it's never going
       to work and skip the test.

	   use Test::More tests => 7;
	   use Date::ICal;

	   # Make sure epoch time is being handled sanely.
	   my $t1 = Date::ICal->new( epoch => 0 );
	   is( $t1->epoch, 0,	       "Epoch time of 0" );

	   SKIP: {
	       skip('epoch to ICal not working on MacOS', 6)
		   if $^O eq 'MacOS';

	       is( $t1->ical, '19700101Z', "  epoch to ical" );

	       is( $t1->year,  1970,	   "  year()"  );
	       is( $t1->month, 1,	   "  month()" );
	       is( $t1->day,   1,	   "  day()"   );

	       # like the tests above, but starting with ical instead of epoch
	       my $t2 = Date::ICal->new( ical => '19700101Z' );
	       is( $t2->ical, '19700101Z', "Start of epoch in ICal notation" );

	       is( $t2->epoch, 0,	   "  and back to ICal" );
	   }

       A little bit of magic happens here.  When running on anything but MacOS, all the tests run
       normally.  But when on MacOS, "skip()" causes the entire contents of the SKIP block to be
       jumped over.  It's never run.  Instead, it prints special output that tells Test::Harness
       that the tests have been skipped.

	   1..7
	   ok 1 - Epoch time of 0
	   ok 2 # skip epoch to ICal not working on MacOS
	   ok 3 # skip epoch to ICal not working on MacOS
	   ok 4 # skip epoch to ICal not working on MacOS
	   ok 5 # skip epoch to ICal not working on MacOS
	   ok 6 # skip epoch to ICal not working on MacOS
	   ok 7 # skip epoch to ICal not working on MacOS

       This means your tests won't fail on MacOS.  This means less emails from MacPerl users
       telling you about failing tests that you know will never work.  You've got to be careful
       with skip tests.  These are for tests which don't work and never will.  It is not for
       skipping genuine bugs (we'll get to that in a moment).

       The tests are wholly and completely skipped. [10]  This will work.

	   SKIP: {
	       skip("I don't wanna die!");

	       die, die, die, die, die;
	   }

       Todo tests

       Thumbing through the Date::ICal man page, I came across this:

	  ical

	      $ical_string = $ical->ical;

	  Retrieves, or sets, the date on the object, using any
	  valid ICal date/time string.

       "Retrieves or sets".  Hmmm, didn't see a test for using "ical()" to set the date in the
       Date::ICal test suite.  So I'll write one.

	   use Test::More tests => 1;
	   use Date::ICal;

	   my $ical = Date::ICal->new;
	   $ical->ical('20201231Z');
	   is( $ical->ical, '20201231Z',   'Setting via ical()' );

       run that and I get

	   1..1
	   not ok 1 - Setting via ical()
	   #	 Failed test (- at line 6)
	   #	      got: '20010814T233649Z'
	   #	 expected: '20201231Z'
	   # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 1.

       Whoops!	Looks like it's unimplemented.	Let's assume we don't have the time to fix this.
       [11] Normally, you'd just comment out the test and put a note in a todo list somewhere.
       Instead, we're going to explicitly state "this test will fail" by wrapping it in a "TODO"
       block.

	   use Test::More tests => 1;

	   TODO: {
	       local $TODO = 'ical($ical) not yet implemented';

	       my $ical = Date::ICal->new;
	       $ical->ical('20201231Z');

	       is( $ical->ical, '20201231Z',   'Setting via ical()' );
	   }

       Now when you run, it's a little different:

	   1..1
	   not ok 1 - Setting via ical() # TODO ical($ical) not yet implemented
	   #	      got: '20010822T201551Z'
	   #	 expected: '20201231Z'

       Test::More doesn't say "Looks like you failed 1 tests of 1".  That '# TODO' tells
       Test::Harness "this is supposed to fail" and it treats a failure as a successful test.  So
       you can write tests even before you've fixed the underlying code.

       If a TODO test passes, Test::Harness will report it "UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED".  When that
       happens, you simply remove the TODO block with "local $TODO" and turn it into a real test.

       Testing with taint mode.

       Taint mode is a funny thing.  It's the globalest of all global features.  Once you turn it
       on it effects all code in your program and all modules used (and all the modules they
       use).  If a single piece of code isn't taint clean, the whole thing explodes.  With that
       in mind, it's very important to ensure your module works under taint mode.

       It's very simple to have your tests run under taint mode.  Just throw a "-T" into the "#!"
       line.  Test::Harness will read the switches in "#!" and use them to run your tests.

	   #!/usr/bin/perl -Tw

	   use Test::More 'no_plan';

	   ...test normally here...

       So when you say "make test" it will be run with taint mode and warnings on.

FOOTNOTES
       1   The first number doesn't really mean anything, but it has to be 1.  It's the second
	   number that's important.

       2   For those following along at home, I'm using version 1.31.  It has some bugs, which is
	   good -- we'll uncover them with our tests.

       3   You can actually take this one step further and test the manual itself.  Have a look
	   at Test::Inline (formerly Pod::Tests).

       4   Yes, there's a mistake in the test suite.  What!  Me, contrived?

       5   We'll get to testing the contents of lists later.

       6   But what happens if your test program dies halfway through?!  Since we didn't say how
	   many tests we're going to run, how can we know it failed?  No problem, Test::More
	   employs some magic to catch that death and turn the test into a failure, even if every
	   test passed up to that point.

       7   I cleaned it up a little.

       8   Most Operating Systems record time as the number of seconds since a certain date.
	   This date is the beginning of the epoch.  Unix's starts at midnight January 1st, 1970
	   GMT.

       9   MacOS's epoch is midnight January 1st, 1904.  VMS's is midnight, November 17th, 1858,
	   but vmsperl emulates the Unix epoch so it's not a problem.

       10  As long as the code inside the SKIP block at least compiles.  Please don't ask how.
	   No, it's not a filter.

       11  Do NOT be tempted to use TODO tests as a way to avoid fixing simple bugs!

AUTHORS
       Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com> and the perl-qa dancers!

COPYRIGHT
       Copyright 2001 by Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>.

       This documentation is free; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms
       as Perl itself.

       Irrespective of its distribution, all code examples in these files are hereby placed into
       the public domain.  You are permitted and encouraged to use this code in your own programs
       for fun or for profit as you see fit.  A simple comment in the code giving credit would be
       courteous but is not required.

perl v5.8.0				    2002-06-01			      Test::Tutorial(3pm)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 PM.

Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyrightę1993-2018. All Rights Reserved.
×
UNIX.COM Login
Username:
Password:  
Show Password





Not a Forum Member?
Forgot Password?