Query: system
OS: redhat
Section: 3
Format: Original Unix Latex Style Formatted with HTML and a Horizontal Scroll Bar
SYSTEM(3) Linux Programmer's Manual SYSTEM(3)NAMEsystem - execute a shell commandSYNOPSIS#include <stdlib.h> int system(const char *string);DESCRIPTIONsystem() executes a command specified in string by calling /bin/sh -c string, and returns after the command has been completed. During execution of the command, SIGCHLD will be blocked, and SIGINT and SIGQUIT will be ignored.RETURN VALUEThe value returned is -1 on error (e.g. fork failed), and the return status of the command otherwise. This latter return status is in the format specified in wait(2). Thus, the exit code of the command will be WEXITSTATUS(status). In case /bin/sh could not be executed, the exit status will be that of a command that does exit(127). If the value of string is NULL, system() returns nonzero if the shell is available, and zero if not. system() does not affect the wait status of any other children.CONFORMING TOANSI C, POSIX.2, BSD 4.3NOTESAs mentioned, system() ignores SIGINT and SIGQUIT. This may make programs that call it from a loop uninterruptable, unless they take care themselves to check the exit status of the child. E.g. while(something) { int ret = system("foo"); if (WIFSIGNALED(ret) && (WTERMSIG(ret) == SIGINT || WTERMSIG(ret) == SIGQUIT)) break; } Do not use system() from a program with suid or sgid privileges, because strange values for some environment variables might be used to subvert system integrity. Use the exec(3) family of functions instead, but not execlp(3) or execvp(3). system() will not, in fact, work properly from programs with suid or sgid privileges on systems on which /bin/sh is bash version 2, since bash 2 drops privileges on startup. (Debian uses a modified bash which does not do this when invoked as sh.) The check for the availability of /bin/sh is not actually performed; it is always assumed to be available. ISO C specifies the check, but POSIX.2 specifies that the return shall always be non-zero, since a system without the shell is not conforming, and it is this that is implemented. It is possible for the shell command to return 127, so that code is not a sure indication that the execve() call failed.SEE ALSOsh(1), signal(2), wait(2), exec(3) 2001-09-23 SYSTEM(3)
Related Man Pages |
---|
system(3posix) - linux |
system(3) - suse |
system(3) - plan9 |
system(3) - xfree86 |
system(3) - x11r4 |
Similar Topics in the Unix Linux Community |
---|
for loop |
Question about system command in C |
SIGINT issue |
Want to terminate command execution when string found in the command output |
Returning an exit code from a bash function |