USERRET(9) BSD Kernel Developer's Manual USERRET(9)NAME
userret -- return path to user-mode execution
SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/lwp.h>
#include <sys/sched.h>
void
userret(struct lwp *l);
DESCRIPTION
The userret() function is executed after processing a trap (e.g., a system call or interrupt) before returning to user-mode execution. The
implementation is machine dependent and is never invoked from machine-independent code. The function prototype for each architecture may be
different to the prototype above, however the functionally provided by the userret() function on each architecture is essentially the same.
Specifically, the userret() function performs the following procedure:
o Detect a change in the signal disposition of the current process and invoke postsig(9) to post the signal to the process. This may
occur when the outcome of the trap or syscall posted a signal to the process (e.g., invalid instruction trap).
o Check the want_resched flag to see if the scheduler requires the current process to be preempted by invoking preempt(9) (see
cpu_need_resched(9)). This may occur if the clock interrupt causes the scheduler to determine that the current process has com-
pleted its time slice.
o Update the scheduler state.
SEE ALSO cpu_need_resched(9), postsig(9), preempt(9), scheduler(9)BSD December 20, 2005 BSD
Check Out this Related Man Page
MI_SWITCH(9) BSD Kernel Developer's Manual MI_SWITCH(9)NAME
mi_switch, cpu_switch, cpu_throw -- switch to another thread context
SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/proc.h>
void
mi_switch(void);
void
cpu_switch(void);
void
cpu_throw(void);
DESCRIPTION
The mi_switch() function implements the machine independent prelude to a thread context switch. It is called from only a few distinguished
places in the kernel code as a result of the principle of non-preemptable kernel mode execution. The various major uses of mi_switch can be
enumerated as follows:
1. From within a function such as cv_wait(9), mtx_lock(9), or tsleep(9) when the current thread voluntarily relinquishes the CPU to
wait for some resource or lock to become available.
2. After handling a trap (e.g. a system call, device interrupt) when the kernel prepares a return to user-mode execution. This case
is typically handled by machine dependent trap-handling code after detection of a change in the signal disposition of the current
process, or when a higher priority thread might be available to run. The latter event is communicated by the machine independent
scheduling routines by calling the machine defined need_resched().
3. In the signal handling code (see issignal(9)) if a signal is delivered that causes a process to stop.
4. When a thread dies in thread_exit(9) and control of the processor can be passed to the next runnable thread.
5. In thread_suspend_check(9) where a thread needs to stop execution due to the suspension state of the process as a whole.
mi_switch() records the amount of time the current thread has been running in the process structures and checks this value against the CPU
time limits allocated to the process (see getrlimit(2)). Exceeding the soft limit results in a SIGXCPU signal to be posted to the process,
while exceeding the hard limit will cause a SIGKILL.
If the thread is still in the TDS_RUNNING state, mi_switch() will put it back onto the run queue, assuming that it will want to run again
soon. If it is in one of the other states and KSE threading is enabled, the associated KSE will be made available to any higher priority
threads from the same group, to allow them to be scheduled next.
After these administrative tasks are done, mi_switch() hands over control to the machine dependent routine cpu_switch(), which will perform
the actual thread context switch.
cpu_switch() first saves the context of the current thread. Next, it calls choosethread() to determine which thread to run next. Finally,
it reads in the saved context of the new thread and starts to execute the new thread.
cpu_throw() is similar to cpu_switch() except that it does not save the context of the old thread. This function is useful when the kernel
does not have an old thread context to save, such as when CPUs other than the boot CPU perform their first task switch, or when the kernel
does not care about the state of the old thread, such as in thread_exit() when the kernel terminates the current thread and switches into a
new thread.
To protect the runqueue(9), all of these functions must be called with the sched_lock mutex held.
SEE ALSO cv_wait(9), issignal(9), mutex(9), runqueue(9), tsleep(9), wakeup(9)BSD November 24, 1996 BSD