error::pass3(7stap) [centos man page]

ERROR::PASS3(7stap)													       ERROR::PASS3(7stap)

NAME

       error::pass3 - systemtap pass-3 errors

DESCRIPTION

       Errors during pass 3 (translation) occur only rarely.

       unsupported code generation
	      Some  script language constructs are not available in every probe point.	For example, the @perf() counter-reading function may only
	      be used in process.*  probes.

GATHERING MORE INFORMATION

       Increasing the verbosity of pass-3 with an option such as --vp 002 may help pinpoint the problem.

SEE ALSO

       stap(1),
       stapprobes(3stap)
       error::reporting(7stap)

															       ERROR::PASS3(7stap)

ERROR::DWARF(7stap)													       ERROR::DWARF(7stap)

NAME

       error::dwarf - dwarf debuginfo quality problems

DESCRIPTION

       Systemtap  sometimes  relies  on  ELF/DWARF  debuginfo  for  programs being instrumented to locate places to probe, or context variables to
       read/write, just like a symbolic debugger does.	Even though examination of the program's source code may show  variables  or  lines  where
       probes  may  be desired, the compiler must preserve information about them for systemtap (or a debugger such as gdb) to get pinpoint access
       to the desired information.  If a script requires such data, but the compiler did not preserve enough of it, pass-2 errors may result.

       Common conditions that trigger these problems include;

       compiler version
	      Prior to GCC version 4.5, debuginfo quality was fairly limited.  Often developers were advised to build their programs with  -O0	-g
	      flags  to disable optimization.  GCC version 4.5 introduced a facility called "variable-tracking assignments" that allows it to gen-
	      erate high-quality debuginfo under full -O2 -g optimization.  It is not perfect, but much better than before.   Note  that,  due	to
	      another gcc bug (PR51358) -O0 -g can actually sometimes make debuginfo quality worse than for -O2 -g.

       function inlining
	      Even  modern gcc sometimes has problems with parameters for inlined functions.  It may be necessary to change the script to probe at
	      a slightly different place (try a .statement() probe, instead of a .function() probe, somewhere a few source lines into the body	of
	      the inlined function.  Or try putting a probe at the call site of the inlined function.  Or use the if @defined($var) { ... } script
	      language construct to test for the resolvability of the context variable before using it.

       instruction reordering
	      Heavily optimized code often smears the instructions from multiple source statements together.  This can	leave  systemtap  with	no
	      place  to choose to place a probe, especially a statement probe specified by line number.  Systemtap may advise to try a nearby line
	      number, but these may not work well either.  Consider placing a probe by a statement wildcard or line number range.

ALTERNATIVES

       In order to reduce reliance on ELF/DWARF debuginfo, consider the use of statically compiled-in instrumentation, such as kernel tracepoints,
       or <sys/sdt.h> userspace markers.  Such instrumentation hook sites are relatively low cost (just one NOP instruction for sdt.h), and nearly
       guarantee the availability of parameter data and a reliable probe site, all without reliance on debuginfo.

SEE ALSO

       stap(1),
       http://dwarfstd.org/,
       http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/TipContextVariables,
       http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Var_Tracking_Assignments,
       warning::debuginfo(7stap),
       error::reporting(7stap)

															       ERROR::DWARF(7stap)