Hoping someone can offer some advice on something i have not dealt with before.
We have a server that seems to have some very strange configuration done on it. It has 2 physical NIC's and rather than both be aggregated into LAN900 we have 1 in LAN900 and 1 in LAN901? (See Below)
Code:
root@uk205:/etc/rc.config.d> nwmgr --get
Name/ Interface Station Sub- Interface Related
ClassInstance State Address system Type Interface
============== ========= ============== ======== ============== =========
lan0 UP 0x00215ADE6C5A iether 1000Base-T lan901
lan1 UP 0x00215ADE6C5B iether 1000Base-T lan900
lan900 UP 0x00215ADE6C5B hp_apa hp_apa
lan901 UP 0x00215ADE6C5A hp_apa hp_apa
lan902 DOWN 0x000000000000 hp_apa hp_apa
lan903 DOWN 0x000000000000 hp_apa hp_apa
lan904 DOWN 0x000000000000 hp_apa hp_apa
My question is this. We have been asked to remove the aggregation as we are trying to figure out some connectivity issues and want to revert back to running network traffic via 1 single NIC to start with. But how do i go about removing the aggregation configuration?
Can i just use the command nwmgr -d -A links=0 -I 900 -S apa for example to remove each port and then stop the daemon with /sbin/init.d/hpapa stop?
Would that work?
Last edited by DukeNuke2; 11-23-2009 at 10:21 AM..
Reason: code tags please!
Hi,
I have Solaris-10 server and link aggregation is configured on this in below way
# dladm show-aggr
key: 1 (0x0001) policy: L4 address: 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a (auto)
device address speed duplex link state
bnx1 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a... (8 Replies)
Hi
ihave three link of internet and iwant to put one linux front of a firewall that this three linux speard firewall such az load balance and fialover but dont close any port and protocol and only firewall have been internet what way can i use for it ?
are there any script and services do that... (0 Replies)
I have setup link aggregation with 3 interfaces on my solaris 10 system.
All looks good but my problem is that the traffic is only going out bge0 and not the other 2 links.
bash-4.3# dladm show-aggr -s
key:33 ipackets rbytes opackets obytes %ipkts %opkts
... (3 Replies)
Hi,
I'm not from the Solaris world and some of these things are new to me. Can someone tell me if it is possible to configure link aggregation without using LACP?
I am told etherchannel was setup without LACP. (3 Replies)
Hi,
I want to Break the Link Aggregation. My aggregation are lan0+lan1 = lan900.
Now I want to break this and put the IP in lan0. But i have cluster environment and this is the main database server.
So It need to change in cluster script.
But I dont know where I have to change it.
Please... (1 Reply)
Me again :)
I'm trying to find a page describing the L2, L3 und L4 modes of dladm.
It's nice to read "hashed by ip header", but how should I use that?
On the file-server it's ok to have the six interfaces serving six clients each on it's own. But an rsync connection via switch between two... (8 Replies)
Hi,
I need to setup a hacmp cluster (my first one, we usually use VCS on AIX), but I require more network bandwith than a normal gigabit etherchannel setup can provide, so I am thinking about using linkaggregation - 2 active adapters to one switch and a single backup adapter to another switch... (4 Replies)
I have some linux machines that I am trying to increase the throughput to on a single connection. They connect to a switch with two 1GbE lines and the switch does not have Link Aggregation support for these machines. I have tried bonding with balance-rr, balance-alb, but the machines can only... (4 Replies)
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (1 Reply)
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (2 Replies)
