Help needed! Raid 5 failure on a Debian System


Login or Register for Dates, Times and to Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Special Forums Hardware Filesystems, Disks and Memory Help needed! Raid 5 failure on a Debian System
# 1  
Help needed! Raid 5 failure on a Debian System

Hello!

I have a 4-disc Raid 5 server running Open Media Vault (Debian). The other day, it disappeared from OMV, which was reporting 3 drives failed. Panic Stations. However, using MDADM I can get info from 3 of the drives which suggests they are functioning ok (info below). The remaining 4th drive doesn't give anything back via mdadm --examine. Any ideas how I can rebuild the drive without destroying the data? According to what I have read, as the three apparently working drives all have the same events number (103), it is fairly likely the data is intact on them - but how to I rebuild?

Thanks my lovelies!

Jon

/dev/sdf:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : dc344271:82f55bd0:fcfd0e16:a2a60bc8
Name : TTVServer:TTV2 (local to host TTVServer)
Creation Time : Mon Jan 7 11:03:39 2013
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4

Avail Dev Size : 5860531120 (2794.52 GiB 3000.59 GB)
Array Size : 17581590528 (8383.56 GiB 9001.77 GB)
Used Dev Size : 5860530176 (2794.52 GiB 3000.59 GB)
Data Offset : 2048 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : active
Device UUID : c792c6b2:78fd4e78:e4f008ea:826e25e8

Update Time : Sat Apr 6 13:17:10 2013
Checksum : 30386dbe - correct
Events : 103

Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K

Device Role : Active device 0
Array State : AAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)


/dev/sdg:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : dc344271:82f55bd0:fcfd0e16:a2a60bc8
Name : TTVServer:TTV2 (local to host TTVServer)
Creation Time : Mon Jan 7 11:03:39 2013
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4

Avail Dev Size : 5860531120 (2794.52 GiB 3000.59 GB)
Array Size : 17581590528 (8383.56 GiB 9001.77 GB)
Used Dev Size : 5860530176 (2794.52 GiB 3000.59 GB)
Data Offset : 2048 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : active
Device UUID : c0426118:614cb315:15c9a0ee:2ad88e26

Update Time : Sat Apr 6 13:17:10 2013
Checksum : 7638ae70 - correct
Events : 103

Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K

Device Role : Active device 1
Array State : AAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)



/dev/sdi:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : dc344271:82f55bd0:fcfd0e16:a2a60bc8
Name : TTVServer:TTV2 (local to host TTVServer)
Creation Time : Mon Jan 7 11:03:39 2013
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4

Avail Dev Size : 5860531120 (2794.52 GiB 3000.59 GB)
Array Size : 17581590528 (8383.56 GiB 9001.77 GB)
Used Dev Size : 5860530176 (2794.52 GiB 3000.59 GB)
Data Offset : 2048 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : active
Device UUID : 8a96d5fe:594418b6:c63dafd0:c459e498

Update Time : Sat Apr 6 13:17:10 2013
Checksum : 5175f080 - correct
Events : 103

Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K

Device Role : Active device 2
Array State : AAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
# 2  
Ok after some more reading, I tried this:

Quote:
mdadm --create /dev/md8 --verbose --level=5 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc missing
and got this:

Quote:
mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric
mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K
mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric
mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric
mdadm: super1.x cannot open /dev/sda: Device or resource busy
mdadm: failed container membership check
mdadm: device /dev/sda not suitable for any style of array

aaaghhh!!!

---------- Post updated at 10:17 PM ---------- Previous update was at 10:13 PM ----------

also...

Quote:
$ sudo cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md8 : inactive sda[0] sdc[2] sdb[1]
8790796680 blocks super 1.2
---------- Post updated at 10:29 PM ---------- Previous update was at 10:17 PM ----------

also:

Quote:
$ sudo mdadm --detail /dev/md8
/dev/md8:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Mon Jan 7 11:03:39 2013
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : -1
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 3
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Sat Apr 6 13:17:10 2013
State : active, degraded, Not Started
Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K

Name : TTVServer:TTV2 (local to host TTVServer)
UUID : dc344271:82f55bd0:fcfd0e16:a2a60bc8
Events : 103

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 0 0 active sync /dev/sda
1 8 16 1 active sync /dev/sdb
2 8 32 2 active sync /dev/sdc
3 0 0 3 removed
Login or Register for Dates, Times and to Reply

Previous Thread | Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:
Advanced Search

Test Your Knowledge in Computers #983
Difficulty: Medium
The first official NetBSD release, NetBSD 0.1, was made on 9 April 1991.
True or False?

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help needed on restart-from-point-of-failure in Parallel Processing

Hi Gurus, Good morning... :) OS Info: Linux 2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Apr 11 17:27:00 EDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I have a script which takes multiples parameters from a properties file one by one and run in background (to do parallel processing). As example: $ cat... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: saps19
4 Replies

2. Debian

Best RAID settings for Debian Server? Help!! (1+0 or 5 or NAS)

I am installing a Debian Server on a: HP Proliant DL380 G4 Dual CPU's 3.20 ghz / 800 mhz / 1MB L2 5120 MB RAM 6 hard disks on HP Smart Array 6i controller (36.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI HD each) I will be using this server to capture VHS video, encode, compress, cut, edit, make DVD's, rip... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Marcus Aurelius
0 Replies

3. AIX

SCSI PCI - X RAID Controller card RAID 5 AIX Disks disappeared

Hello, I have a scsi pci x raid controller card on which I had created a disk array of 3 disks when I type lspv ; I used to see 3 physical disks ( two local disks and one raid 5 disk ) suddenly the raid 5 disk array disappeared ; so the hardware engineer thought the problem was with SCSI... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: filosophizer
0 Replies

4. SCO

file system not getting mounted in read write mode after system power failure

After System power get failed File system is not getting mounted in read- write mode (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gtkpmbpl
1 Replies

5. Solaris

Contingency planning for System Failure

I have inhereted a Solaris 8 server which is running an important application in our production environment. The dilema is that the server has just one internal hard drive I believe it was installed using jump start, it does not even have a CD ROM drive and root is not mirrored (since there is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Tirmazi
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

need sample system o/p RHEL/Debian

Hi, Could somebody sent me sample output of below commands on 1) Debian linux and 2) RHEL3 and 3) any RHEL version less than 3, a) uname -a b) cat /etc/issue c) cat /etc/redhat-release or other equivalent file Thanks in advance - Krishna (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: krishnamurthig
0 Replies

7. Solaris

RAID controller needed for SVM?

hi this may be a very stupid question, but im quite new to Solaris (gonna buid my first system, Solaris 10 on x86 system, connected to other windows systems in a home network) i wanna put a RAID 5 system in there to back up my other systems at home; iv read that its really so easy with SVM to... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Landser
4 Replies

8. SCO

driver needed for hp smartarry p200i sas raid controller

recently we have purchased hp proliant ml350 g5 server and configured raid 5 with hp smartarray p200i sas controller.but i could not found any sas raid controller hp smartarry p200i driver for sco unix 5.0.7 :(.i searched on hp support site,but no use.any one can help. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: prakrithi
3 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Ultra60 and A1000....raid manager needed just to see it?

Hi guys, I was asked to setup an Ultra60 (Sol 8) with an StorEdge A1000. Does anyone know if a probe-scsi-all is suppose to detect it? Right now it doesn't, so maybe I answered my own question :rolleyes: We have an the same setup running already, but I wasn't around when that was setup. ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Yinzer955i
3 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Raid control vs scsi for operating system

I was trying to get a server using a raid controller card up and running. I could not get the card configured right so i just installed the system strait onto a scsi drive. Questions? Is is nescessary to have the operating system on raid? Pros/Cons Is it really difficult to go back later... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: macdonto
1 Replies

Featured Tech Videos