Visit Our UNIX and Linux User Community


FreeBSD 5.2.1


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems BSD FreeBSD 5.2.1
# 1  
Old 06-16-2004
Computer FreeBSD 5.2.1

I want someone tell me the positives and negatives points of FreeBSD 5.2.1, if someone help me, i thanks a lot!
# 2  
Old 06-16-2004
I look at it in a simple way... If I have a workstation or server that I want to run the latest, unstable versions of software on, then I would install 5.2.1. I would also use 5.2.1 if I had some type of hardware device that wasn't supported in 4.10.

If, OTOH, I was running a server that was connected to the rest of the world and providing potentially insecure services like named, httpd, mail, etc. Then I'd probably choose the stability and security of 4.10...since running bleeding edge is not really a sane choice when running a public server.

Personally, I'm paranoid and I run OpenBSD -STABLE on servers in a DMZ. And in my LAN and on my workstations I run more bleeding edge stuff like FBSD 5.2.1 OBSD-CURRENT and gentoo with ~x86 set in make.conf.
# 3  
Old 06-16-2004
I detest: FreeBSD 5.2.1 is not `unstable'. Granted it hasn't been tagged `stable', per se, as yet, but you make it sound worse than Microsoft Windows.

However, I do agree with your remark regarding a mission critical server. If this is what your purpose is, then use the `stable' branch, otherwise, use (as I do) the latest 5.x-RELEASE.
# 4  
Old 06-16-2004
Quote:
Originally posted by Russell
However, I do agree with your remark regarding a mission critical server. If this is what your purpose is, then use the `stable' branch, otherwise, use (as I do) the latest 5.x-RELEASE.
this is true of ALL os's with a stable and unstable branch...
# 5  
Old 07-07-2004
Some other things worth noting about FreeBSD 5.2.1

5.x now supports background fsck's when soft updates are enabled. It creates a snapshot of the filesystem, and does a filesystem check on that. For people coming from the Linux world, it is something like Ext3/Rieserfs journaling. (however, in the background it works very differently)

5.x has alot more driver support. Check the supported hardware list if you want to be sure your hardware is supported. For example, I was forced to use FreeBSD 5.2 rather then 4.10 because of an 802.11g card I have.

5.2.1 has better jail() support then 5.0.

5.2.1 no long requires perl to be installed in the base system (allowing you to install just the ports version of perl rather then having both a system perl and a ports perl, as well as lowing the disk requirements for the base install)


And there is a number of other changes you could check the FreeBSD changelog for.

As stated above, FreeBSD 5.2.1 is not marked as stable, but I consiter it much more stable then some other 'stable' operating systems.

Previous Thread | Next Thread
Test Your Knowledge in Computers #159
Difficulty: Easy
The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) need two ports per host for full-duplex, bidirectional traffic.
True or False?

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Fedora

FreeBSD

I'm using Windows mostly and the only *nix thing I used during my life was cygwin (I like command line :)). But currently I have (by an occasion) a DVD with latest FreeBSD. I don't know why, but I want to install it... But probably, this OS is too difficult for a beginner. I heard, it's used on... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: TeenageWerewolf
3 Replies

2. Programming

Application crashes in FreeBSD 7.1 while working ok in FreeBSD 6.3

Hello there, My mulithreaded application (which is too large to represent the source code here) is crashing after installing FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE/amd64. It worked properly on others machines (Dual Cores with 4GB of RAM - FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE/i386). The current machine has 2x Core 2 Duo... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Seenquev
1 Replies

3. BSD

please help me in FreeBSD

Hi to all, Iam doing a project in Free BSD and i am stuck with a puzzle. Please any one of you clarify my doubt : How to add a mechanism to check the status of the file system which alerts the root user via. email if any single partition is greater than 90% full. This alert should include the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tadakamalla
3 Replies

4. BSD

Having problem with FreeBSD 5.3

I just download the FreeBSD 5.3 i386 iso files. And I have a problem now, I can't copy the 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso to the cd, I try a lot of times, even change lots of blank cd to try but still cannot. But I can copy the other three iso files, i.e. 5.3-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso,... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: GarbageKing
4 Replies

5. BSD

I want the Best FREEBSD

B]I want the best of the best FreeBSD version for my study in Unix...please sugest me... Thanks (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: israel
5 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

FreeBSD

What is FreeBSD, who does use Free? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: cyberangel
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Freebsd 4.5

i am new at unix and am VERY confused about the compression processes. what progs do i need to unzip and zip files? there must be a standard one similar to winzip? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Mindscan
1 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

FreeBSD

I am on AOL now,and i am using 56 k,i was gonna install FreeBSD,but i dont know if aol works on BSD,or my modem. Do they work on BSD? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kita
2 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

need help with FreeBSD!!!

Hi I want to write to my output_file using: if((fptr = creat(output_file, _S_IWRITE)) == -1) { printf("output_file..."..); return (1); } for(...) { _write(fptr, buffer, BUF_SIZE); } It says "_S_IWRITE" undeclared!!! Anybody knows what function I can use for that and what I... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lacasa
3 Replies

Featured Tech Videos