Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Intel CPU benchmarks
Special Forums Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions Intel CPU benchmarks Post 52461 by Kelam_Magnus on Friday 18th of June 2004 02:19:57 PM
Old 06-18-2004
This thread mentions AMD vs Intel...


Sharky Extreme.com




Athlon XP Model Core Speed (FSB)
Athlon XP 3200+ (Barton) 2.2 GHz (400)
Athlon XP 3000+ (Barton) 2.167 GHz (333)
Athlon XP 2800+ (Barton) 2.083 GHz (333)
Athlon XP 2800+ ..............2.25 GHz (333)
Athlon XP 2700+ ..............2.167 GHz (333)
Athlon XP 2600+ ..............2.083 GHz (333)
Athlon XP 2600+ ..............2.13 GHz (266)
Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton) 1.83 GHz (333)

Athlon XP 2400+ ..............2.00 GHz (266)
Athlon XP 2200+ ..............1.80 GHz (266)
Athlon XP 2100+ ..............1.73 GHz (266)
Athlon XP 2000+ ..............1.67 GHz (266)
Athlon XP 1900+ ..............1.60 GHz (266)
Athlon XP 1800+ ..............1.53 GHz (266)
Athlon XP 1700+ ..............1.47 GHz (266)



Of course, my 3200AMD runs in game trials at 3GHZ+ in real time high use games....even though it clocks out at 2.2GHZ.
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Linux Processing Benchmarks ?

Hello everyone. Does anyone know where to I could find published benchmarks for how a Linux box performs. It would be nice if I could find a comparison to the Windows OS. Thanks, Lance (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: lcstephens
2 Replies

2. Linux Benchmarks

Instructions for Linux Benchmarks

STEP 1: Get the source here: https://www.unix.com/source/bm.zip or https://www.unix.com/source/unix_linux_bench.tar.gz STEP 2: unzip or untar and cd into the bm directory STEP 3: make (Note: there is a pre-compiled Linux binary in the distro, so Linux users don't have to make a... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies

3. UNIX Benchmarks

Instructions for UNIX Benchmarks

STEP 1: Get the source here: https://www.unix.com/source/bm.zip or https://www.unix.com/source/unix_linux_bench.tar.gz STEP 2: Unzip or Untar STEP 3: make STEP 4: Run STEP: 5: Please login to www.unix.com and post test results along with platform info to: Include (if you... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies

4. UNIX Benchmarks

unix s/w download using benchmarks

I downloaded the unix s/w given in the bench marks to my home laptop. The C: drive isn't partitioned.The instructions are given to unzip, make and run. please list the proper ways to do the commands how to unzipa nd make them. should i partition my hard drive? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sravus
3 Replies

5. Linux Benchmarks

Results for Linux Benchmarks

Hi, I was trying to build Linux Benchmarks with latest Intel C++ Compiler. When I used -ipo (inter-procedural optimization) option, arithmetic test (arith.c) failed on execution. The problem is Intel compiler's advanced optimization option (-ipo) optimizes much more than expected and this... (50 Replies)
Discussion started by: cpjain
50 Replies

6. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

VMmark virtualization benchmarks

Hi, We have to make a decision to buy 10 new servers for MS Exchange/Domain Controller running virtual tiles and for hardware we have choice of HP Proliant DL380 G6, Dell PowerEdge R710 & IBM X3650 M2, somebody sent me comparison of VMmark virtualization performance benchmark which states that... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tayyabq8
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Understanding Benchmarks

I need a little clarification in understanding why there would be a need for a benchmark file when used with a backup script. Logically thinking would tell me that the backups itself(backuptest.tgz) would have the time created and etc. So what would be the purpose of such a file: touch... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: metallica1973
6 Replies

8. Red Hat

Esxi INTEL cpu vs esxi AMD cpu

Hi i have 2 esxi. one is amd based cpu and the other is intel based cpu. i have a redhat linux machine that was created in amd cpu esxi, now i need to migrate it (powered off) to INTEL based esxi. will the redhat machine will be OK with that? Thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: guy3145
2 Replies
WL(4)							 BSD/i386 Kernel Interfaces Manual						     WL(4)

NAME
wl -- T1 speed ISA/radio lan card SYNOPSIS
device wl0 at isa? port 0x300 irq 5 DESCRIPTION
The wl driver controls a radio lan card system made originally by NCR, then ATT, now Lucent. The system is spread-spectrum radio at around 915 MHz (or 2.4 GHz). With the supplied omni-directional antennae, about 400 feet (indoors, more outdoors) can be covered in circumference. This card can talk to the companion (wlp0) pccard. Speeds vary from 1 megabit to theoretically 2 megabits (roughly T1 in speed). The card has three fundamental hardware units, a so-called PSA or programmable storage area, a radio modem, and a Ethernet lan controller. The latter component is the ancient (and not very honorable) Intel 82586 Ethernet chip. Fundamentally it appears to the operating system as an Ethernet system, and speaks IEEE MAC addresses. The radio modem simply translates Ethernet packets to/from radio packets, that are either at 2.4 GHz or 915 MHz depending on the radio modem. It supports a collision avoidance scheme. The lan controller supports promiscuous mode, broadcast, and multicasting (although there is a glitch in the latter). "It thinks it is Ethernet". How it is used depends on the kind of antennae deployed with it. Point to point applications are possible as are Ethernet-like lan use. The vendor ships an omni-directional antennae that works in the vicinity of 400 feet (indoors). Point to point antennae can be purchased that will go miles. SETUP
The card can either be initialized with the vendor supplied DOS setup software. Typically minimally an IRQ, port, and Network ID must be supplied. Michael Smith's wlconfig(8) utility can now be used to do this work from the UNIX side. The card is "not" plug and play. The network id controls whether one set of cards can hear another. If different, cards will read physical packets, but they will be discarded by the radio modem. CONTROL
In addition to the config utility, there are several sysctl switches that can be used to modify runtime parameters. The sysctl(8) variables are as follows: machdep.wl_xmit_delay <useconds> This variable will cause the driver to insert a delay on transmit. 250 is the default. The delay should probably be a bit longer on faster cpus and less on slower cpus. It exists because the 82586 was not designed to work with Pentium-speed cpu systems and if overdriven will have copious xmit side errors. machdep.wl_ignore_nwid <0 | 1> This switch defaults to 0; i.e., the nwid is not ignored. It can be set to 1 to cause the nwid to not be used. This may be useful when the device is in promiscuous mode as one can watch for all packets and ignore nwid differences. machdep.wl_xmit_watch <milliseconds> This switch is not currently useful. machdep.wl_gather_snr <milliseconds> This switch is not currently useful. There is also a signal strength cache in the driver. It may be interrogated with wlconfig(8). Incoming packets are checked for certain hardware radio-modem values including signal strength, silence, and quality, which range fro 0..63, 0..63, and 0..15 respectively. Thus one can read out signal strenth values to see how close/far peer nodes are. The signal strength cache is indexed by sender MAC address. There are two sysctls that change how it filters packets. Both are on by default. machdep.wl_wlcache_mcastonly <0 | 1> By default this switch is on. It forces the cache to filter out unicast packets. Only broadcast or multicast packets are accepted. machdep.wl_wlcache_iponly <0 | 1> By default this switch is on. It forces the driver to discard non-IP packets and also stores the IP src address. ARP packets are ignored, as are any other network protocol barring IPv4 packets. CAVEATS
The 82586 has numerous defects. It may experience transmit-side errors when modern faster cpus send packets at it faster than it can handle. The driver (and probably the chip) does not support an all multicast mode. As a result, it can be used with applications like mrouted(8) (ports/net/mrouted), but it must go into promiscuous mode for that to work. The driver is slow to change modes from "normal" to promiscuous mode, presumably due to delays in the configuration code. SEE ALSO
sysctl(8), wlconfig(8) http://www.wavelan.com HISTORY
The wl driver was written by Anders Klemets (thousands of years ago?) and appears to be based on an even older Intel 82586 driver. The 82586 controller was one of the first (if not the first?) integrated lan controller on the block. That does not mean it was the best either. Anders ported and or created a driver for the ISA wavelan and PCCARD wavelan system too (wlp). Robert T. Morris, Jr. ported the Mach drivers to BSDI. Jim Binkley ported them to FreeBSD 2.1. Michael Smith ported the wl driver only to 2.2.2. Jim and Michael have been maintaining them. The current state of the driver is NOT ANYONE'S FAULT. Thanks to Bernie Doehner and Robert Buaas for contributions. AUTHORS
Too numerous to mention. See above. BSD
September 29, 2006 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy