Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Chmod Help!
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Chmod Help! Post 5212 by LivinFree on Wednesday 8th of August 2001 11:29:22 PM
Old 08-09-2001

Yup, that'll be a problem. To the best of my knowledge, Angelfire does not allow Unix shell access. That would mean that your discussion board may not work on Angelfire at all. I may be mistaken, but I doubt that they'd do the installation for you...

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

CHMOD Help!!

Ok, listen.........I was using FTP Works to remove and add some files to a domain server. I messed with chmod button and made it so that no-one could access or their browsers could execute files and 2 or three certain directories. If anyone knows how to use this command and will give me a heads up... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jarrell
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

chmod

Hi, can anybody help me? i have probable a simple problem about permissions. i have a server and on this server there comes some files from a another server via ftp with a separte user. i would like to modify the files with a awk script but i donīt have the permissions to modify the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: scotty
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

chmod...

Hey everyone, I was wondering if there was a quicker way to chmod a lot of files than doing what im currently doing. At the moment, im doing chmod 777 *filename* - but I have a lot of files, sub-directories, sub-files etc etc. And at the moment I see I have to chmod every single file... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mo0ness
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

CHMOD query

Hi peeps, I'm new here, so I hope I'm posting in the right place... If I'm in a particular directory and I run the command 'CHMOD * 777' (or the other way around- I can't remember), am I right in saying it will only change the permissions of all the immediate files and directories and not... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jsp_1983
1 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

CHMOD Question

I've always been fascinated by permissions and I have a question. Since the shell isn't a "virtual environment" (like say a web forum, where permissions can be enforced with absolute confidence), what's actually keeping an unauthorized user from viewing a CHMODed file? The read/write routines? Why... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: froth
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

CHMOD problems... Help!

Hey. I was playing somethink with chmods, and then i did chmod -R 755 / :eek: so linux but with errors and sshd not working .... Can some one give me proper chmods or better script that will do it. pls help fast (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: net555
7 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

help with chmod (files only)

hello, i want to chmod 444 all files in a directory, files in subdirs cannot be chmoded same goes for the subdirs themself. So using: chmod -R 444 /dir/ won't work because it will chmod the directorys and files (together with files in subdirectorys) I figured out how to chmod files... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: TehOne
1 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

chmod question

I have two files,like follows: $ls -l foo bar -rw------- bar -rw-rw-rw- foo Then I execute follow code: chmod("foo",(statbuf.st_mode & ~S_IXGRP) | S_ISGID) chmod("bar",S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH) Then I view the result $ls -l foo bar -rw-r--r-- bar... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: konvalo
1 Replies

9. UNIX and Linux Applications

What is the difference between chmod in solaris and chmod in Linux?

i think it is the same in both... Iam i right? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sumaiya
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

chmod

Hi I tried to use chmod in unix to change my file's permission. chmod 701 hello.cgi And it did change my desired file's permission. Yet, the name of the file is changed to hello.cgi* . And therefore I cannot compile it after that. So, I just wondering why there is an extra '*' in the file's... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: alvin8906
2 Replies
EC(4)							   BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual 						     EC(4)

NAME
ec -- driver for 3Com EtherLink II (3c503) ISA bus Ethernet cards SYNOPSIS
ec0 at isa? port 0x250 iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 DESCRIPTION
The ec device driver supports 3Com EtherLink II (3c503) Ethernet cards for ISA bus which are based on the National Semiconductor DP8390/WD83C690 Ethernet interface chips. MEDIA SELECTION
The EtherLink II supports two media types on a single card. All support the AUI media type. The other media is either BNC or UTP behind a transceiver. Software cannot differentiate between BNC and UTP cards. To enable the AUI media, select the 10base5 or aui media type with ifconfig(8)'s media directive. To select the other media (BNC or UTP), select the 10base2 or bnc media type. DIAGNOSTICS
ec0: wildcarded IRQ is not allowed The IRQ was wildcarded in the kernel configuration file. This is not supported. ec0: invalid IRQ <n>, must be 3, 4, 5, or 9 An IRQ other than the above IRQ values was specified in the kernel configuration file. The EtherLink II hardware only supports the above listed IRQ values. ec0: failed to clear shared memory at offset <off> The memory test was unable to clear shared the interface's shared memory region. This often indicates that the card is configured at a con- flicting iomem address. ec0: warning - receiver ring buffer overrun The DP8390 Ethernet chip used by this board implements a shared-memory ring-buffer to store incoming packets. The 3c503 usually has only 8K bytes of shared memory. This is only enough room for about 4 full-size (1500 byte) packets. This can sometimes be a problem, especially on the original 3c503, because these boards' shared-memory access speed is quite slow; typically only about 1MB/second. The overhead of this slow memory access, and the fact that there is only room for 4 full-sized packets means that the ring-buffer will occasionally overrun. When an overrun occurs, the board must be reset to avoid a lockup problem in early revision DP8390 Ethernet chips. Resetting the board causes all of the data in the ring-buffer to be lost, requiring the data to be retransmitted/received, congesting the board further. Because of this, maximum throughput on these boards is only about 400-600K bytes per second. This problem is exacerbated by NFS because the 8-bit boards lack sufficient packet buffer memory to support the default 8K byte packets that NFS and other protocols use as their default. If these cards must be used with NFS, use the mount_nfs(8) -r and -w options in /etc/fstab to limit NFS's packet size. 4K (4096) byte packets generally work. SEE ALSO
ifmedia(4), intro(4), isa(4), ifconfig(8), mount_nfs(8) BSD
October 20, 1997 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy