Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Ksh93 on Linux compatible with ksh93 on AIX Post 302984165 by drl on Friday 21st of October 2016 11:16:09 AM
Old 10-21-2016
Hi, Keith.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Turley
y ... Do you know of any automation tools that can examine shell scripts and list utilised commands and programs to make the analysis easier? There are about 25 scripts doing various functions mainly file system commands such as copying files, sed, invoking sqlplus, grep etc.....
Take a look at post 16 in thread How to pre-check scrutinize all my shell scripts?

I posted a perl script that may help you see what commands might be used in shell scripts. It is rough because it is an experiment. There is an example input shell script with the resulting output. The perl script, p1.txt, should be copied to a file p1, add execution permission, then run it as shown in the example.

The perl script ran correctly in this environment:
Code:
aix 7.1.0.0
perl 5.10.1

Best wishes ... cheers, drl

Last edited by drl; 10-21-2016 at 12:24 PM..
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Strange array handling in ksh93

I wrote a script in ksh93 (the OS is AIX 5.2, ML7), which failed to run. After some testing i found out why, but the answer is a bit dissatisfying. Look for yourself: #!/bin/ksh93 # --------- Step Names typeset achStepName="foo" typeset achStepName="bar" typeset achStepName="fubar"... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
3 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh93 deprecation...

Any means of running ksh93 in a ksh88-mode? Might sound odd, but I want/need to restrict U/Win-developed scripts to correspond to the ksh88 version on my Solaris environment(s). Thanks. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: curleb
2 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh88 or ksh93

Hi all! Does anybody know how can I check if any UNIX installation has implemented ksh88 or ksh93? Thanks in advance. Néstor. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nestor
3 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Performance degradation with KSH93

Hi, I have a script that calls an external program to perform some calculations and then I read with "grep" and "sed" values from the output files. I've noticed that performance of KSH93 degrades with every iteration. The output files are all the same size, so I don't understand why after the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: i.f.schulz
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Install ksh93 for cygwin

Hi, Does anyone know where can I get ksh93 for installation on CYGWIN. Thanks? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: devtakh
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

ksh93 newline character problem

Hi , I am working on Linux, with ksh93 installed. The following statement echo \\n just prints \n on this shell. However on pdksh echo \\n gives a blank new line as a output. What is the correct way of printing a new line character on the ksh93? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: neeto
4 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh93 different results using -x option

This problem seems to be specific to ksh93. If you run with set -x some scripts don't work properly. For example: $ cat ksh.test2 ] && print FUBAR! || print OK! $ $ /bin/ksh93 ksh.test2 OK! $ /bin/ksh93 -x ksh.test2 + ] + print FUBAR! FUBAR! $ Trying to find out why this is... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: lthorson
8 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Embed tcl in ksh93 script

Hello everyone, I am trying to embed some tcl code inside a ksh93 script but I am not having any success. I even tried the simplest of code, something like this: . . jk=$(echo $(tcl << | write_file junkme "test"' | )) just to see if a file gets written. When I run there are no errors, but ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gio001
3 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Possible ksh93 Bug Expanding Variables?

My OS is Linux (kernel 4.08.something) and AIX (7100-04-01-1543), the used ksh versions are: ksh88: Version M-11/16/88f (AIX) ksh93: Version M 93t+ 2009-05-01 (AIX), Version M 93u (Linux) When writing a parser for stanza files in ksh i encountered a rather strange behavior. Here is a... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
4 Replies

10. AIX

Ksh93/AIX compatibility

Hi everyone ! Im trying to know from wich version of AIX KSH93 is available ? Internet tell me 6.x and 7.x AIX are available, bue what about 5.x ? Is KSH93 available on AIX 5.x ? Is it the same way to manipulate variables as KSH93 on 7.x ? Thanks for your support and have a nice day ! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: majinfrede
2 Replies
NPM-RUN-SCRIPT(1)														 NPM-RUN-SCRIPT(1)

NAME
npm-run-script - Run arbitrary package scripts SYNOPSIS
npm run-script <command> [--silent] [-- <args>...] alias: npm run DESCRIPTION
This runs an arbitrary command from a package's "scripts" object. If no "command" is provided, it will list the available scripts. run[-script] is used by the test, start, restart, and stop commands, but can be called directly, as well. When the scripts in the package are printed out, they're separated into lifecycle (test, start, restart) and directly-run scripts. As of ` https://blog.npmjs.org/post/98131109725/npm-2-0-0, you can use custom arguments when executing scripts. The special option -- is used by getopt https://goo.gl/KxMmtG to delimit the end of the options. npm will pass all the arguments after the -- directly to your script: npm run test -- --grep="pattern" The arguments will only be passed to the script specified after npm run and not to any pre or post script. The env script is a special built-in command that can be used to list environment variables that will be available to the script at run- time. If an "env" command is defined in your package, it will take precedence over the built-in. In addition to the shell's pre-existing PATH, npm run adds node_modules/.bin to the PATH provided to scripts. Any binaries provided by locally-installed dependencies can be used without the node_modules/.bin prefix. For example, if there is a devDependency on tap in your package, you should write: "scripts": {"test": "tap test/*.js"} instead of "scripts": {"test": "node_modules/.bin/tap test/*.js"} to run your tests. The actual shell your script is run within is platform dependent. By default, on Unix-like systems it is the /bin/sh command, on Windows it is the cmd.exe. The actual shell referred to by /bin/sh also depends on the system. As of ` https://github.com/npm/npm/releases/tag/v5.1.0 you can customize the shell with the script-shell configuration. Scripts are run from the root of the module, regardless of what your current working directory is when you call npm run. If you want your script to use different behavior based on what subdirectory you're in, you can use the INIT_CWD environment variable, which holds the full path you were in when you ran npm run. npm run sets the NODE environment variable to the node executable with which npm is executed. Also, if the --scripts-prepend-node-path is passed, the directory within which node resides is added to the PATH. If --scripts-prepend-node-path=auto is passed (which has been the default in npm v3), this is only performed when that node executable is not found in the PATH. If you try to run a script without having a node_modules directory and it fails, you will be given a warning to run npm install, just in case you've forgotten. You can use the --silent flag to prevent showing npm ERR! output on error. You can use the --if-present flag to avoid exiting with a non-zero exit code when the script is undefined. This lets you run potentially undefined scripts without breaking the execution chain. SEE ALSO
o npm help 7 scripts o npm help test o npm help start o npm help restart o npm help stop o npm help 7 config January 2019 NPM-RUN-SCRIPT(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy