Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Why sum of recs in awk don't match total rec count? Post 302772775 by mjf on Tuesday 26th of February 2013 07:46:21 PM
Old 02-26-2013
Thanks for the explanation alister! I was able to find the offending line missing the newline char.

Last edited by mjf; 02-26-2013 at 09:45 PM..
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

how to count number of rows and sum of column using awk

Hi All, I have the following input which i want to process using AWK. Rows,NC,amount 1,1202,0.192387 2,1201,0.111111 3,1201,0.123456 i want the following output count of rows = 3 ,sum of amount = 0.426954 Many thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: pistachio
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk count characters, sum, and divide by another column

Hi All, I am another biologist attempting to parse a large txt file containing several million lines like: tucosnp 56762 T Y 228 228 60 23 .CcCcc,,..c.c,cc,,.C... What I need to do is get the frequency of periods (.) plus commas (,) in column 9, and populate this number into another... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: peromhc
1 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Total Count using AWK

Hi Everybody, I have the following example file... 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1 199|TST-GURGAON|GURGAON|1... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: sraj142
8 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk and count sum ?

I have a input.txt file which have 3 fields separate by a comma place, os and timediff in seconds tampa,win7, 2575 tampa,win7, 157619 tampa,win7, 3352 dallas,vista,604799 greenbay,winxp, 14400 greenbay,win7 , 518400 san jose,winxp, 228121 san jose,winxp, 70853 san jose,winxp, 193514... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: sabercats
5 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

sum using awk with pattern match

I have a file which has data like this *** Query completed. One row found. *** Query completed. One row found. *** Query completed. One row found. *** Insert completed. 5 rows added. *** Query completed. No rows found. *** Query completed. One row found. *** Query completed. One... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sol_nov
2 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk Help -- If match found return the count

Hi All, I need to get the count of records in the file, if the passing parameter matches with the list of records in the file. Below is my example source file: Test1.dat 20120913 20120913 20120912 20120912 20120912 20120912 20120912 20120913 20120913 20120912 In my script I am... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: bbc17484
5 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk pattern match and count unique in column

Hi all I have a need of searching some pattern in file by month and then count unique records D11 G11 R11 -------> Pattern available in file S11 Jan$1 to $5 column contains some records in which I want to find unique for this purpose I have written script like below awk '/Jan/ ||... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: nex_asp
4 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk to output match and mismatch with count using specific fields

In the below awk I am trying output to one file those lines that match between $2,$3,$4 of file1 and file2 with the count in (). I am also trying to output those lines that are missing between $2,$3,$4 of file1 and file2 with the count of in () each. Both input files are tab-delimited, but the... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: cmccabe
7 Replies

9. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Awk: count unique elements in a field and sum their occurence across the entire file

Hi, Sure it's an easy one, but it drives me insane. input ("|" separated): 1|A,B,C,A 2|A,D,D 3|A,B,B I would like to count the occurence of each capital letters in $2 across the entire file, knowing that duplicates in each record count as 1. I am trying to get this output... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: beca123456
5 Replies
A2P(1)							 Perl Programmers Reference Guide						    A2P(1)

NAME
a2p - Awk to Perl translator SYNOPSIS
a2p [options] [filename] DESCRIPTION
A2p takes an awk script specified on the command line (or from standard input) and produces a comparable perl script on the standard output. OPTIONS Options include: -D<number> sets debugging flags. -F<character> tells a2p that this awk script is always invoked with this -F switch. -n<fieldlist> specifies the names of the input fields if input does not have to be split into an array. If you were translating an awk script that processes the password file, you might say: a2p -7 -nlogin.password.uid.gid.gcos.shell.home Any delimiter can be used to separate the field names. -<number> causes a2p to assume that input will always have that many fields. -o tells a2p to use old awk behavior. The only current differences are: o Old awk always has a line loop, even if there are no line actions, whereas new awk does not. o In old awk, sprintf is extremely greedy about its arguments. For example, given the statement print sprintf(some_args), extra_args; old awk considers extra_args to be arguments to "sprintf"; new awk considers them arguments to "print". "Considerations" A2p cannot do as good a job translating as a human would, but it usually does pretty well. There are some areas where you may want to examine the perl script produced and tweak it some. Here are some of them, in no particular order. There is an awk idiom of putting int() around a string expression to force numeric interpretation, even though the argument is always integer anyway. This is generally unneeded in perl, but a2p can't tell if the argument is always going to be integer, so it leaves it in. You may wish to remove it. Perl differentiates numeric comparison from string comparison. Awk has one operator for both that decides at run time which comparison to do. A2p does not try to do a complete job of awk emulation at this point. Instead it guesses which one you want. It's almost always right, but it can be spoofed. All such guesses are marked with the comment ""#???"". You should go through and check them. You might want to run at least once with the -w switch to perl, which will warn you if you use == where you should have used eq. Perl does not attempt to emulate the behavior of awk in which nonexistent array elements spring into existence simply by being referenced. If somehow you are relying on this mechanism to create null entries for a subsequent for...in, they won't be there in perl. If a2p makes a split line that assigns to a list of variables that looks like (Fld1, Fld2, Fld3...) you may want to rerun a2p using the -n option mentioned above. This will let you name the fields throughout the script. If it splits to an array instead, the script is probably referring to the number of fields somewhere. The exit statement in awk doesn't necessarily exit; it goes to the END block if there is one. Awk scripts that do contortions within the END block to bypass the block under such circumstances can be simplified by removing the conditional in the END block and just exiting directly from the perl script. Perl has two kinds of array, numerically-indexed and associative. Perl associative arrays are called "hashes". Awk arrays are usually translated to hashes, but if you happen to know that the index is always going to be numeric you could change the {...} to [...]. Iteration over a hash is done using the keys() function, but iteration over an array is NOT. You might need to modify any loop that iterates over such an array. Awk starts by assuming OFMT has the value %.6g. Perl starts by assuming its equivalent, $#, to have the value %.20g. You'll want to set $# explicitly if you use the default value of OFMT. Near the top of the line loop will be the split operation that is implicit in the awk script. There are times when you can move this down past some conditionals that test the entire record so that the split is not done as often. For aesthetic reasons you may wish to change index variables from being 1-based (awk style) to 0-based (Perl style). Be sure to change all operations the variable is involved in to match. Cute comments that say "# Here is a workaround because awk is dumb" are passed through unmodified. Awk scripts are often embedded in a shell script that pipes stuff into and out of awk. Often the shell script wrapper can be incorporated into the perl script, since perl can start up pipes into and out of itself, and can do other things that awk can't do by itself. Scripts that refer to the special variables RSTART and RLENGTH can often be simplified by referring to the variables $`, $& and $', as long as they are within the scope of the pattern match that sets them. The produced perl script may have subroutines defined to deal with awk's semantics regarding getline and print. Since a2p usually picks correctness over efficiency. it is almost always possible to rewrite such code to be more efficient by discarding the semantic sugar. For efficiency, you may wish to remove the keyword from any return statement that is the last statement executed in a subroutine. A2p catches the most common case, but doesn't analyze embedded blocks for subtler cases. ARGV[0] translates to $ARGV0, but ARGV[n] translates to $ARGV[$n-1]. A loop that tries to iterate over ARGV[0] won't find it. ENVIRONMENT
A2p uses no environment variables. AUTHOR
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org> FILES
SEE ALSO
perl The perl compiler/interpreter s2p sed to perl translator DIAGNOSTICS
BUGS
It would be possible to emulate awk's behavior in selecting string versus numeric operations at run time by inspection of the operands, but it would be gross and inefficient. Besides, a2p almost always guesses right. Storage for the awk syntax tree is currently static, and can run out. perl v5.14.2 2010-12-30 A2P(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy