Login or Register to Ask a Question and Join Our Community

Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: IPMP configuration and detach problem
Operating Systems Solaris IPMP configuration and detach problem Post 302343049 by gxmsgx on Tuesday 11th of August 2009 11:42:00 AM
Old 08-11-2009
SOLVED

1) delete line "setprop local-mac-address? 'true'" from /boot/solaris/bootenv.rc
2) delete line "ether 0:c:29:67:16:ef" from /etc/hostname.e1000g2
3) reboot

Code:
# ifconfig -a
...cut...
e1000g1: flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.72.33 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
        groupname ipmp0
        ether 0:c:29:67:16:ef 
e1000g1:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.72.40 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
e1000g2: flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER> mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 192.168.72.34 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
        groupname ipmp0
        ether 0:c:29:67:16:f9 
e1000g2:1: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 192.168.72.40 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255

Detach test (e1000g2,e1000g1)
Code:
# if_mpadm -d e1000g2
/var/adm/messages
clab2 in.mpathd[470]: [ID 832587 daemon.error] Successfully failed over from NIC e1000g2 to NIC e1000g1

# ifconfig -a
...cut...
e1000g1: flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.72.33 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
        groupname ipmp0
        ether 0:c:29:67:16:ef 
e1000g1:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.72.40 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
e1000g1:2: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.72.40 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
e1000g2: flags=89040842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER,OFFLINE> mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 192.168.72.34 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
        groupname ipmp0
        ether 0:c:29:67:16:f9 

# if_mpadm -r e1000g2
/var/adm/messages
clab2 in.mpathd[470]: [ID 620804 daemon.error] Successfully failed back to NIC e1000g2

# if_mpadm -d e1000g1
/var/adm/messages
clab2 in.mpathd[470]: [ID 832587 daemon.error] Successfully failed over from NIC e1000g1 to NIC e1000g2

# ifconfig -a
...cut...
e1000g1: flags=89040842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER,OFFLINE> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.72.33 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
        groupname ipmp0
        ether 0:c:29:67:16:ef 
e1000g2: flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER> mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 192.168.72.34 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
        groupname ipmp0
        ether 0:c:29:67:16:f9 
e1000g2:1: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 192.168.72.40 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255
e1000g2:2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 192.168.72.40 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.72.255

# if_mpadm -r e1000g1
/var/adm/messages
clab2 in.mpathd[470]: [ID 620804 daemon.error] Successfully failed back to NIC e1000g1

thanks to all
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. HP-UX

fstream - detach in aCC

How to use detach function for aCC. Error 187: "/cc/smc3/root/development/auto_activation/AARS/src/ResultServer.cpp", line 623 # Referenced object 'detach' is not a member of class basic_ofstream<char,std::char_traits<char> > . READ_TOKEN(tmp) (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: onlyforforum
0 Replies

2. Solaris

IPMP. Is this a NIC problem!!?

-- IPMP Groups -- Node Name Group Status Adapter Status --------- ----- ------ ------- ------ IPMP Group: hostname1.xx-xxxx.xxxi sc_ipmp1 Online ce5 Online IPMP Group: hostname1.xx-xxxx.xxxi ipmpgrp01... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: FeNiCrC_Neil
2 Replies

3. Solaris

IPMP/HA: most common configuration

Hi, based on your experience what is the most common IPMP configuration on a two nodes cluster for HA failover / scalable services? ...active-active, active-standby with probe-based failure detection etc. Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gxmsgx
3 Replies

4. Solaris

IPMP Configuration

Hi all, Currently i got a server which had two interface. I had study the <SystemAdministration Guide: IP> but still donno what is the correct step to configure it. Can u all help me on it? thanks # ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: SmartAntz
6 Replies

5. Solaris

IPMP Configuration

Dear All, I have configured IPMP in one of my SUN machine which is having solros 9 version. I have updated all files like /etc/hosts,/etc/hostname.ce0 and /etc/hostname.ce1 and rebooted the server. But IP's are not mounted which i have given in /etc/hosts file. Please find the below ifconfig... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: lbreddy
6 Replies

6. Solaris

IPMP active-standby configuration

Hi All, Need your help to explaining why when i configure 2 interface IPMP active-standby appear, INACTIVE and DEPRECATED parameter, detail screen shoot as below : root@machine01 # ifconfig -a e1000g0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 7 inet... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Wong_Cilacap
6 Replies

7. Solaris

IPMP problem

Hi all i had two interface ce0 and ce5 but when i run the ifconfig, it show me alot of extra virtual interface, may i know how to remove it? # ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 ce0:... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: SmartAntz
2 Replies

8. Solaris

veritas volume in DETACH STATE

Hello, recently some disks lost contact with solaris 10 system but the disks came back online on their own. I used "vxreattach disk" to attach them to dg and started raid 5 volume. Voulme's kstate is Enabled however state is DETACH. It bothers me a lot. In this state also I can mount the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: upengan78
1 Replies

9. Solaris

IPMP Configuration Question/Problem

Hi, I have two physical interface connected to solaris box. 1. e1000g1 2. e1000g2 I have added these interfaced under a same IPMP group "IPMP1" After that I have configured a test address for e1000g1 like below ifconfig e1000g1 addif <ip-address> netmask + broadcast + -failover... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: praveensharma21
1 Replies
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy