Sponsored Content
Special Forums News, Links, Events and Announcements Modern Operating Systems: Tanenbaum Post 20577 by PxT on Monday 29th of April 2002 02:40:34 PM
Old 04-29-2002
In a related vein, if you have never seen the famous Linus vs. Tanenbaum debate you should really give it a read -- http://groups.google.com/groups?thre...0star.cs.vu.nl


I wonder if Tanenbaum has changed his mind about the design decisions of Linux since 1992? Obviously his arguments about micro vs. mono-lithic kernels have not hindered the development of Linux.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Operating Systems??

We are currently running two servers each with remote file systems mounted on each other. They need upgrading from Solaris 2.6 to 8. Does anyone know if there is a problem with having one server running Solaris 2.6 and the other v8?? Until we have time to upgrade them both. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hesmas
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Opinions on db operating systems Wanted

I am interested in hearing anyones opinions on what OS they would choose to run a MySQl db and the reasons why, of course. I have a task to build a db server for a project that will be very busy if things work as the creative minds think that it will. I am running a FreeBSD box right now on... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: smtpgeek
0 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Unix Operating Systems Information Document

Hi all, I prepared a document on UNIX OS. Its an humble attempt to share my knowledge. Please review the document attached and correct if any mistakes and any suggestions to make it more useful and any troubleshooting information if needed to add. Please help in making the document to add... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gurukottur
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Where the operating systems are going

Dear administrators I want to post the following question and, honestly, I don't know in which forum to post it since its general meaning. my question is: Where the operating system are going? Microkernel, monolithich or hybrid ? Because this question involves more forums at the same but... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Puntino
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

unix Operating Systems 5

Hi :) I have unix Operating Systems 5 I need working for user logout befor 10 minutes,In the case that he is not active :o what do I do? :rolleyes: (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: fakhwork
4 Replies

6. Fedora

Unix-based operating systems

Hello. I own a MacBook (black) running Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5.8), and I'm curious about a few things -- any help will be very, very much appreciated. I'm pretty much a newbie to Unix, although I have some very basic command-line skills with Mac OS X's Terminal. So while I know how to work the... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Tron55555
13 Replies

7. Programming

Does the assembler output differ between operating systems ?

The assembly code generated by assembler, from a C-source code depends on the CPU architecture underlying it, eg x-86 . Then does the assembler output of a simple C-source code (containing common function-calls of both windows and linux) differ between Operating Systems ? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vishwamitra
1 Replies

8. Google Chrome OS

Do we need many Operating Systems?

we have windows linux- redhat ubuntu -or more i don't know unix- solares snow-lepord and recently chrome what do you think well when i sow that all has extentions like exe -dsb i felt scared (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Anna Hussie
1 Replies

9. Solaris

Modern systems and login parameters

With Solaris newer versions where SSH is enabled by default, do we still need to configure security parameters in /etc/default/login for e.g. SLEEPTIME, CONSOLE etc? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: kurumi
0 Replies
URI::URL(3)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					       URI::URL(3)

NAME
URI::URL - Uniform Resource Locators SYNOPSIS
$u1 = URI::URL->new($str, $base); $u2 = $u1->abs; DESCRIPTION
This module is provided for backwards compatibility with modules that depend on the interface provided by the "URI::URL" class that used to be distributed with the libwww-perl library. The following differences exist compared to the "URI" class interface: o The URI::URL module exports the url() function as an alternate constructor interface. o The constructor takes an optional $base argument. The "URI::URL" class is a subclass of "URI::WithBase". o The URI::URL->newlocal class method is the same as URI::file->new_abs. o URI::URL::strict(1) o $url->print_on method o $url->crack method o $url->full_path: same as ($uri->abs_path || "/") o $url->netloc: same as $uri->authority o $url->epath, $url->equery: same as $uri->path, $uri->query o $url->path and $url->query pass unescaped strings. o $url->path_components: same as $uri->path_segments (if you don't consider path segment parameters) o $url->params and $url->eparams methods o $url->base method. See URI::WithBase. o $url->abs and $url->rel have an optional $base argument. See URI::WithBase. o $url->frag: same as $uri->fragment o $url->keywords: same as $uri->query_keywords o $url->localpath and friends map to $uri->file. o $url->address and $url->encoded822addr: same as $uri->to for mailto URI o $url->groupart method for news URI o $url->article: same as $uri->message SEE ALSO
URI, URI::WithBase COPYRIGHT
Copyright 1998-2000 Gisle Aas. perl v5.12.5 2011-08-13 URI::URL(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy