03-04-2002
About the 'ordering' - without getting involved in distro A vs. distro B, could I be allowed to state that they are sorted in 'from most windows-like to less windows like in decending order' - so that if the objective is to learn Unix, vs. getting the most windows-like (perceived as 'easy') Linux, you may want to try out Slackware.
For someone whose objective it is to get the most 'Unix-like' Linux, I always recommend like this:
1. Slackware
2. Debian
3. Redhat
RedHat is probably the ultimate compromise, it sticks to Unix standards for filesystem layout, etc. but also uses a very 'Windows-like' graphical login.
Could I also state that I personally think text based install programs are a lot easier to work with than graphics-based ones - you get only relevant info, no 'decorations' and you are sure that it will work on all video cards ...
I realize that this states just the opposite of what was said before, but I felt it necessary to say this, in the hope that it will not create confusion, but clarity on one thing:
1. Linux can be anything you want it to be.
2. You must be clear about what you want before you spend time and money on a particular distro.
And then, rant over, please do not let us forget that Linux is far from the only free Unix for PC:
There is also a whole other set: FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, (almost) free Solaris ... I would range these side by side with, or even above Slackware, though, in 'Unix-likeness'.
With all respect and hat off to previous poster for ranging in descending 'ease of use'.
Atle
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I have linux box setup and connected to a cable modem via a hub which is shared with other win98 pcs. I need to set up the linux box with dhcp.
I have two issues:
First: For some reason, every time I activate the eth0 interface, it seems to deactivate itself after some time all by itself.... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: alam
1 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Ok, I'm kind of in between newbie and experienced somewhere. I'm an advanced computer user but only have a little experience with linux and a lot of problems with it. Currently I'm using Linux-Mandrake 8.0 (I know, I know, but let's not go into the many reasons why it's not even close to the best... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nazo
2 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi
I'm using Linux, in the directory /root/my
there is a.out. but when I try to run it , the
shell indicate "bash:a.out: command not found"
but I AM working in this directory. if I use
"./a.out" , it works perfectly.
can any body tell me how to do a permanent set up so that
I can use... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: dell9
5 Replies
4. Linux
I am a new learner of linux, my friend told me that it is very good
to learn linux, so I dropped the idea of deleting it but now I faced
a problem again , how am I going to set my computer to connect to my ISP and other computers?? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: terrychen0804
1 Replies
5. SuSE
Hey,
I was wondering if anybody could help me setup my PhpMyAdmin on my SUSE linux 9.1 machine. I want to use it to access MySQL server instead of the defualt MySQLCC-Console Manager.
I have not tried yet but i have done a such and it's installed in one of the folders.
I would like to point... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: sybella1
15 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi,
I just want to know if it's possible to set the UID bit for a script, so that it executes not as a owner of process, but owner of the script.
i.e
script tesh.sh owned by 'user1', 'file1' owned by user1 has 700 permisssions
`who am i`
rm -v /tmp/file1
user 2 need to execute test.sh, ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: braindrain
2 Replies
7. Red Hat
We have two machines, prod and uat. The TERM variable in both machines are different
prod
echo $TERM
vt100
UAT
echo $TERM
xterm
I have checked the .profile file and could not find any entry ? There are some scripts on the box which are run by Autosys scheduler they seem to run in... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: amit1_x
1 Replies
8. Red Hat
Friends ,
Can I set two hostname in a Linux server at a time ?
I want to give two hostname of my Linux server , is it possible to do ?
Plz inform .. .. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: shipon_97
2 Replies
9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I'm having a problem regarding the encoding of my files in Linux and AIX.
I have a file which can be viewed both in Linux and AIX (via NetApp mount). When I checked the encoding, they have difference.
In Linux, the file is encoded as ISO-8859 text. (checked by using "file" command).... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Jin_
1 Replies
10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi All,
I have a file (lets say filenames.txt) which contains a list of file names.
Is there a way I can append a prefix to the filenames as below,
Thanks much for your help
Freddie (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dsfreddie
3 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
sys::hostname::long
Sys::Hostname::Long(3pm) User Contributed Perl Documentation Sys::Hostname::Long(3pm)
NAME
Sys::Hostname::Long - Try every conceivable way to get full hostname
SYNOPSIS
use Sys::Hostname::Long;
$host_long = hostname_long;
DESCRIPTION
How to get the host full name in perl on multiple operating systems (mac, windows, unix* etc)
DISCUSSION
This is the SECOND release of this code. It has an improved set of tests and improved interfaces - but it is still often failing to get a
full host name. This of course is the reason I wrote the module, it is difficult to get full host names accurately on each system. On some
systems (eg: Linux) it is dependent on the order of the entries in /etc/hosts.
To make it easier to test I have testall.pl to generate an output list of all methods. Thus even if the logic is incorrect, it may be pos-
sible to get the full name.
Attempt via many methods to get the systems full name. The Sys::Hostname class is the best and standard way to get the system hostname.
However it is missing the long hostname.
Special thanks to David Sundstrom and Greg Bacon for the original Sys::Hostname
SUPPORT
This is the original list of platforms tested.
MacOS Macintosh Classic OK
Win32 MS Windows (95,98,nt,2000...)
98 OK
MacOS X Macintosh 10 OK
(other darwin) Probably OK (not tested)
Linux Linux UNIX OS OK
Sparc OK
HPUX H.P. Unix 10? Not Tested
Solaris SUN Solaris 7? OK (now)
Irix SGI Irix 5? Not Tested
FreeBSD FreeBSD OK
A new list has now been compiled of all the operating systems so that I can individually keep informaiton on their success.
THIS IS IN NEED OF AN UPDATE AFTER NEXT RELEASE.
Acorn - Not yet tested
AIX - Not yet tested
Amiga - Not yet tested
Atari - Not yet tested
AtheOS - Not yet tested
BeOS - Not yet tested
BSD - Not yet tested
BSD/OS - Not yet tested
Compaq - Not yet tested
Cygwin - Not yet tested
Concurrent - Not yet tested
DG/UX - Not yet tested
Digital - Not yet tested
DEC OSF/1 - Not yet tested
Digital UNIX - Not yet tested
DYNIX/ptx - Not yet tested
EPOC - Not yet tested
FreeBSD - Not yet tested
Fujitsu-Siemens - Not yet tested
Guardian - Not yet tested
HP - Not yet tested
HP-UX - Not yet tested
IBM - Not yet tested
IRIX - Not yet tested - 3rd hand information might be ok.
Japanese - Not yet tested
JPerl - Not yet tested
Linux
Debian - Not yet tested
Gentoo - Not yet tested
Mandrake - Not yet tested
Red Hat- Not yet tested
Slackware - Not yet tested
SuSe - Not yet tested
Yellowdog - Not yet tested
LynxOS - Not yet tested
Mac OS - Not yet tested
Mac OS X - OK 20040315 (v1.1)
MachTen - Not yet tested
Minix - Not yet tested
MinGW - Not yet tested
MiNT - Not yet tested
MPE/iX - Not yet tested
MS-DOS - Not yet tested
MVS - Not yet tested
NetBSD - Not yet tested
NetWare - Not yet tested
NEWS-OS - Not yet tested
NextStep - Not yet tested
Novell - Not yet tested
NonStop - Not yet tested
NonStop-UX - Not yet tested
OpenBSD - Not yet tested
ODT - Not yet tested
OpenVMS - Not yet tested
Open UNIX - Not yet tested
OS/2 - Not yet tested
OS/390 - Not yet tested
OS/400 - Not yet tested
OSF/1 - Not yet tested
OSR - Not yet tested
Plan 9 - Not yet tested
Pocket PC - Not yet tested
PowerMAX - Not yet tested
Psion - Not yet tested
QNX
4 - Not yet tested
6 (Neutrino) - Not yet tested
Reliant UNIX - Not yet tested
RISCOS - Not yet tested
SCO - Not yet tested
SGI - Not yet tested
Symbian - Not yet tested
Sequent - Not yet tested
Siemens - Not yet tested
SINIX - Not yet tested
Solaris - Not yet tested
SONY - Not yet tested
Sun - Not yet tested
Stratus - Not yet tested
Tandem - Not yet tested
Tru64 - Not yet tested
Ultrix - Not yet tested
UNIX - Not yet tested
U/WIN - Not yet tested
Unixware - Not yet tested
VMS - Not yet tested
VOS - Not yet tested
Windows
CE - Not yet tested
3.1 - Not yet tested
95 - Not yet tested
98 - Not yet tested
Me - Not yet tested
NT - Not yet tested
2000 - Not yet tested
XP - Not yet tested
z/OS - Not yet tested
KNOWN LIMITATIONS
Unix
Most unix systems have trouble working out the fully quallified domain name as it to be configured somewhere in the system correctly. For
example in most linux systems (debian, ?) the fully qualified name should be the first entry next to the ip number in /etc/hosts
192.168.0.1 fred.somwhere.special fred
If it is the other way around, it will fail.
Mac
TODO
Contributions
David Dick
Graeme Hart
Piotr Klaban
* Extra code from G
* Dispatch table
* List of all operating systems.
Solaris * Fall back 2 - TCP with DNS works ok * Also can read /etc/defaultdomain file
SEE ALSO
L<Sys::Hostname>
AUTHOR
Scott Penrose <scottp@dd.com.au>
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2001,2004,2005 Scott Penrose. All rights reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
under the same terms as Perl itself.
perl v5.8.8 2008-03-12 Sys::Hostname::Long(3pm)