The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
Google UNIX.COM


Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions Questions involving Unix to Windows (Desktop or Server) go here. Any Windows/DOS questions should go here as well.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quad Ethernet hshapiro SUN Solaris 5 09-25-2007 06:10 PM
No: of processors bishweshwar UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 3 11-14-2006 02:38 AM
gar stupid quad booting lord_of_pie UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 0 02-25-2006 10:38 PM
Quad Booting... jboswell BSD 1 03-02-2005 03:26 PM
Quad Fast Ethernet Card on Sparc 10? jskillet IP Networking 7 09-26-2002 08:26 AM

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Quad or Duel Processors

Which hardware configuration gives you the best though put for processing?

1.) Quad CPU at 2 GHZ
2.) Dual CPU at 3 GHZ and More Memory.


We currently have setup #1, I want to upgrade the server and I am investigating hardware configurations. Wanted to know if set #1 gives better though put or set # 2?
Reply With Quote
Forum Sponsor
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 379
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
There is no way of knowing for sure because it depends on the software you are trying to run.

If your software is able to use the multiple processors for parallel processing the quad option may well be better. But many apps don't do that, in which case the faster dual processors will have better performance.

Another factor is your workload characteristics. Can you run your software multiple times? For example, I once administered a 24 processor webserver where we ran up to 80 instances of a webserver all at once. The fact that we had lots of processors didn't make any of the individual webservers run faster, but it did allow us to have more running at once without slowing down the box. In a case like that more processors is helpful. But if you are running just a single instance of your app the extra processors are useless (unless the app does parallel threading like I mentinoed above).

Your best option is to install your software on both types and benchmark it before buying if possible.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Let me re-phrase the question

Thanks RHfromMN,


The information you provided is very helpful but let me re-phrase the question hopefully I in the right forum.

The correct question is : Is Veritas Netbackup written to capitalize on the Quad processer hardware or the Dual processer hardware with more memory?

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2005
Perderabo's Avatar
Unix Daemon
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington DC Area
Posts: 8,253
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
It kinda depends on how much memory each config has. And also how many clients will netbackup be serving.

But one thing is now clear: 2GHz to 3 GHz won't help very much at all. Netbackup mostly waits for tape drives and networks. It is I/O bound and it doesn't need super fast cpu's. It tends to have mutiple processes running and thus can benefit from more cpu's.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Thumbs up

Thanks Perderabo,

That is exactly the answer I needed. It should have come to me but I guess I'm to close to situation.Who would ogf thought it would be that simple.

This thread can be closed. Do you know how to do it?
Reply With Quote
Google UNIX.COM
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


The 50 most popular UNIX and Linux searches.
Google Search Cloud for The UNIX and Linux Forums
421 service not available, remote server has closed connection ^m automate ftp autosys awk trim bash eval bash for loop boot: cannot open kernel/sparcv9/unix command copy/move folder in unix couldn't set locale correctly curses.h cut command in unix find grep find mtime find null character in a unix file grep multiple lines grep or grep recursive hp-ux ifconfig inaddr_any inappropriate ioctl for device lynx javascript mailx attachment mget mtime perl array length ping port remove first character from string in k shell replace space by comma , perl script scp recursive segmentation fault(coredump) sftp script snoop unix solaris change ip address stale nfs file handle syn_sent tar exclude tar extract to folder test: argument expected unix unix .profile unix forum unix forums unix internals unix interview questions unix mtime unix simulator unix.com vi substitute while loop within while loop shell script


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008 The CEP Blog All Rights Reserved -Ad Management by RedTyger Visit The Global Fact Book

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101