The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
Google UNIX.COM
Home Forums Register Rules & FAQ Members List Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions Questions involving Unix to Windows (Desktop or Server) go here. Any Windows/DOS questions should go here as well.


Other UNIX.COM Threads You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x40236ff4 *** norsk hedensk High Level Programming 15 05-16-2008 04:57 PM
SuSE: Xorg and XFree (SUSE-SA:2008:003) iBot Security Advisories (RSS) 0 01-17-2008 10:10 AM
ftp zip files corruption colesga Shell Programming and Scripting 3 08-02-2007 08:22 AM
data corruption with ftp transfer malcom UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 12 08-04-2003 04:38 AM
file corruption shibz UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 5 09-06-2002 08:56 AM

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
NTFS corruption under w2k but not under suse 9.2

Hello all,
Iīve bumped into some strange things with a NTFS partition of mine. I am running a dual boot machine with w2k and suse 9.2. I just reinstalled w2k on it. After that one of my NTFS partitions stopped working under windows. Though it is perfectly readable from linux.
Windows sees the physical drive but claims it to be corrupted, so does partitionmagic.
As far as I know linux havenīt written to the NTFS partition as I believe they are read only under linux.
Anyone whoīs got a clue of what I could do to resurrect it in w2k?

Help much appreciated!
Reply With Quote
Forum Sponsor
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 1,377
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Make a new NTFS partition. Copy all files to the new partition to a FAT partition on Linux. Mount the drive containing the FAT partition on Windows and copy everything to the new NTFS one. Remove the old one and the FAT.

Another chance: there is a tool called "partition image" (http://www.partimage.org/) on Linux that allows archival and duplication of partitions including NTFS. I had no luck when I used it (WinXP still failed to read the original and recreated partition) but your mileage may vary. My Windows XP failed to read my old Win2k NTFS partition in the same situation as you are, but I just moved all the files needed to keep to my FAT partition and removed the partition altogether.

A Win2k install won't read a Win2k partition. That's strange. But it didn't come to me as unexpected as I haven't found NTFS reliable after all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
interesting that someone else has encountered the same thing. Yes, your solution has come to mind. But that will be a last resort. At the moment I havenīt got the space to create extra partitions. I need to get a new HD to backup things.

This partition that is lost to w2k has just been a normal drive, it never had w2k installed on it.

The partimage thing looks interesting, will keep it in mind for the future. It says itīs NTFS support is experimental though, maybe that was why it didnīt work for you?

Thanks for the input so far.
Anyone else with insight into this issue?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 1,377
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
The recreated partition could be read on Linux. It just didn't work for Windows itself. So I assumed that was not perfect but not totally invalid filesystem.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2005
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 1,377
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Just found this:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/153973/EN-US/
Reply With Quote
Google UNIX.COM
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008 The CEP Blog All Rights Reserved -Ad Management by RedTyger

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102