![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions Questions involving Unix to Windows (Desktop or Server) go here. Any Windows/DOS questions should go here as well. |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Checking Current Service Pack & Hot Fixes of XP | swapan | Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions | 1 | 06-02-2008 02:55 AM |
| Recommendation for mail server | jwzumwalt | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 08-20-2007 07:09 AM |
| Partitioning recommendation | criglerj | BSD | 4 | 08-18-2007 11:57 AM |
| Aix - Service Pack | BabylonRocker | AIX | 1 | 10-18-2006 01:54 AM |
| Hardware Recommendation | ipaddict | HP-UX | 1 | 03-23-2006 12:22 PM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
XP Service Pack 2: My Recommendation: Don't Upgrade
Hi,
I have de-installed Windows SP2 on XP Pro. The new 'security features' are really annoying and don't add any value to an experienced user. Also, SP2 also ruined performance of Netscape 7.1, and generally killed CPU performance. I do not recommend installation of SP2, based on my experience. Neo |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I second that!
I have one Windows box left on my network (running XP Pro). As long as you are running a good Windows based firewall (Norton Internet Security Professional does it for me), and are using a decent browser (Firefox 0.92 in my case), then there is no point upgrading to SP2 whatsoever. As Neo says, if you are an experienced user, you'll be looking after your system properly anyway, and won't need Redmonds "help"!! Cheers ZB |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
What are the annoyances about the super-wow-joy-jiffy-enhanced security features King Bille has to offer today?
(before I run off and do something silly, like upgrade...) |
||||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |