The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > The Lounge > What's on Your Mind?
.
google unix.com



What's on Your Mind? Come inside and relax a while. Maybe play a few Video Arcade Games if you have free time.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ssh to another computer det219 Shell Programming and Scripting 5 11-14-2008 05:54 PM
who - PC Computer name gefa UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 4 04-26-2007 10:11 AM
getting computer name coredump2003 High Level Programming 2 02-17-2004 07:45 AM
how do you get 2 windows off your computer binary_king Filesystems, Disks and Memory 3 11-28-2002 02:46 PM
Downloading vs buying latest version of os lavonte UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 4 09-11-2001 01:51 AM

View Poll Results: If possible, would you buys OS X for your PC?
Yes - I would definitely want to buy it for my PC! 10 32.26%
No - No way man, not for me. 6 19.35%
Perhaps - Depends on how it is implemented... 15 48.39%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009
tlarkin tlarkin is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
If possible, would you consider buying OS X for a non Mac computer?

Title says it all. I am doing a little research for a blog I want to write up on my website about different OS platforms. One thing that I am trying to figure out, is that would it appeal to people to load OS X on their PC, and would they be willing to pay for it?

If so, would you even consider buying Mac hardware, or only run it if they allowed you to buy it and install it on your PC?

What are your thoughts and concerns if this were possible?

This is completely hypothetical and while there are projects out there like OS X x86 I am talking about official pay for software from Apple.

So the standard price for OS X is like $99 to $129 depending on if you can get the upgrade, or $199 for a 5 install license (they call it the family pack), would you be willing to buy it and try it on your PC?

Thoughts and concerns?

Thanks in advance for discussing this.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009
tlarkin tlarkin is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
Thanks for everyone who voted, if you don't mind elaborating your decision either I would appreciate it and also be interested in what you have to say.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009
Neo's Avatar
Neo Neo is online now Forum Staff  
Administrator
  
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Asia Pacific
Posts: 6,727
I like OS X, using it every day for my big screen desktop.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009
reborg's Avatar
reborg reborg is online now Forum Staff  
Administrator
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,229
I voted no. But in order to make sense of my vote I should explain.

I personally don't like the Mac OS interface, and I am not a big fan of many of the implementation of many of the administrative tools. Yes, I could install tools to do things those things way I want but as someone who works mostly from the command line it makes more sense for me to use something which behaves in a more traditional way such Solaris, GNU/Linux or BSD. Also I don't use any of the software for which Macs are the ideal platform.

Having said that, from a business perspective if there was a truly legitimate (not ambiguous) way to do this and people reporting to me wanted to use OS X and it would run on the standard hardware provided to them I wouldn't have a problem approving it on the condition that they could perform all of their work without needing to use another paid-license OS.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2009
tlarkin tlarkin is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by reborg View Post
I voted no. But in order to make sense of my vote I should explain.

I personally don't like the Mac OS interface, and I am not a big fan of many of the implementation of many of the administrative tools. Yes, I could install tools to do things those things way I want but as someone who works mostly from the command line it makes more sense for me to use something which behaves in a more traditional way such Solaris, GNU/Linux or BSD. Also I don't use any of the software for which Macs are the ideal platform.

Having said that, from a business perspective if there was a truly legitimate (not ambiguous) way to do this and people reporting to me wanted to use OS X and it would run on the standard hardware provided to them I wouldn't have a problem approving it on the condition that they could perform all of their work without needing to use another paid-license OS.
I also use the command line and like to script everything, however, that doesn't mean it can't be efficiently done from the GUI. The one thing I love about OS X is that when I do something on the back end (be it shell script or Casper Policy at work) there is almost always a GUI answer for it. So, I can tell another person in the IT department who doesn't know Unix how to do it through the GUI if need be.


I would just like to see better market competition. Also, I think Apple has achieved something with Unix that no one else has done, and I think (but could be wrong on this) that OS X is the most widely used Unix based OS.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2009
Corona688 Corona688 is online now
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarkin View Post
I also use the command line and like to script everything, however, that doesn't mean it can't be efficiently done from the GUI.
The problem with relying on the topmost system layer is the lower, less visible ones may end up badly neglected. I haven't seen much refinement to OSX's UNIX underpinnings at all; it's enough to run Darwin, and beyond that they don't demand much of it. Darwin gets the new features and development.

Last edited by Corona688; 01-14-2009 at 06:29 PM..
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2009
Swathe Swathe is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 23
I voted perhaps. I have never used OSX so I would need to get some hands on to evaluate. If the provided a free 120 day trial install or similar I would definitely give it a decent go before deciding whether to build a box for it.
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
apple, mac, mac os x, macintosh, mamp

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0