The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > The Lounge > What's on Your Mind?
Google UNIX.COM


What's on Your Mind? Come inside and relax a while. Maybe play a few Video Arcade Games if you have free time.

View Poll Results: What is safest?
Linux (all flavors and distros) 5 41.67%
BSD (all types) 7 58.33%
Unix (like AIX, Solaris,...) 7 58.33%
Mac 2 16.67%
M$ (all after ME, but not including 2000) 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Streamlined Firefox 3 makes browsing safer, more productive iBot UNIX and Linux RSS News 0 06-20-2008 12:00 PM
Nuclear Elephant iPhone Wipe making your iPhone Safer for Resale sparcguy What's on Your Mind? 0 06-11-2008 10:42 PM

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2008
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: /home/
Posts: 71
Is M$ safer than UN*X(-LIKE)??

I know that you already know the answer to the question. It just springed in my mind after what happened yesterday. I was getting some books off of Amazon.com, since they are cheeper than bookstore, and my mother said something that made me laugh 'till I couldn't breathe. I have a Debian Lenny box while my parents have an XP box. My mom still doesn't understand the difference so she thinks that because I don't have antivirus or antispyware like she does, that my box is less safe I tried to explain it again but she still can't grasp M$ virus vs PC virus. So she says that we must do it on an M$ box since it is more secure. So, basically, this is a question for all you UN*X users out there, and maybe you Mac fans: Has a Windows user ever told you that your machine wasn't safe from all those nasty viruses and trojens [that only affect Windows I might add] since you don't have anti virus or anti anything?

P.S. She also told me that that Norton 360 was safer than Linux.

Any ADMIN can delete this if they believe that it breaks any UNIX.com rules.
Reply With Quote
Forum Sponsor
  #2  
Old 07-01-2008
Smiling Dragon's Avatar
Disorganised User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 734
There's malware out there for mac and linux. Don't get too cocky there
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2008
Perderabo's Avatar
Unix Daemon
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington DC Area
Posts: 8,666
In my last job we had a Solaris based ftp server. It had a Microsoft virus infected file that was distributed to dozens of our clients' pc's before we caught it. Our clients complained our ftp server was infected. Were they right? In any event, we started runnning a virus scanner. That virus scanner would have caught the infected file.

So depending on your home network and what interactions can occur among your home systems, I might agree with your Mom. Just because you're immune doesn't mean that you should not care if you bring infected files into your home.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2008
blowtorch's Avatar
Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,328
In your case Per, its the file that was infected. I wouldn't say that your Solaris server was infected, but it did act as a host/carrier.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2008
reborg's Avatar
Administrator
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,643
The argument could be made that it was infected. Even in medical terms an a host or asymptomic carrier is defined as being infected but not suffering the symptoms of infection; that seems like an appropriate description, the host suffers no ill effects but can transmit the disease.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2008
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: /home/
Posts: 71
Well the virus scanner on a server is a definiate since probably 70% of your clients are going to have a M$ Windows box, and most viruses are Windows aimed. I am going to add stuff to my computer like virus protection, but I already had IPtables setup via FireStarter at the time. But the orginal statement was saying that, as I have found, the average Windows user doesn't know the difference between Windows virus and PC virus and believe that all viruses and malware in Windows works on almost any PC.

For example, I called an Internet Service Provider, I won't say who though, and asked them if their internet security that they offer through their internet connection only protected Windows PC's or does it cover other OS such as UNIX or UNIX-like and the response I received was: Don't those viruses affect all computers?
Not bashing windows users, but people just need to understand the difference between PC viruses and Windows viruses and Linux viruses, etc...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2008
blowtorch's Avatar
Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,328
Hm, could all of us refer to Microsoft as MS instead of M$? I mean everyone is in the OS business to make money...
Reply With Quote
Google The UNIX and Linux Forums
Reply

Tags
linux, solaris

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger Visit The Complex Event Processing Blog

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0