|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| What's on Your Mind? Come inside and relax a while. Maybe play a few Video Arcade Games if you have free time. |
| View Poll Results: How is the site performing | |||
| Performance is much better |
   
|
24 | 64.86% |
| Performance is a little better |
  
|
5 | 13.51% |
| Performance is the same |
  
|
2 | 5.41% |
| Performance is a little worse |
  
|
1 | 2.70% |
| Performance is much worse |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| I am seeing strange behavior |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| I don't know, I never had any problems |
|
5 | 13.51% |
| I have posted in the thread with an answer not in the poll |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll | |||
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Announcing collectl - new performance linux performance monitor | MarkSeger | News, Links, Events and Announcements | 0 | 10-26-2007 03:14 PM |
| Site Performance | Neo | What's on Your Mind? | 9 | 09-18-2007 05:24 AM |
| AIX Site | bakunin | News, Links, Events and Announcements | 0 | 12-04-2005 10:14 PM |
 |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
09-22-2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Site Performance II
I have updated the backend hosting for UNIX.COM and would appreciate feedback either in the form of a vote in the poll or a post so that we can plan for more changes if any are needed.
In particular let me us know if you see any strange behavior from the site as there may still be some unforeseen side effects from the changes. |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
#2
09-23-2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Much better than the worst I've seen over the past couple of weeks. Thanks for the upgrade, reborg.
|
|
#3
09-24-2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great job reborg!
The 4 CPUs and 2GB of memory make a huge difference over 1CPU and 512MB of memory. I'll be interested to see the performance when the on-line users are close to 1000 / 30 minute like it was before the performance hit dropped us in the Google ranks. Cheers and thanks again! |
|
#5
10-18-2007
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
ajcannon, i come from *way back*, wenn really BIG computers (no, not PCs - mainframes) had 1 MB of memory and I did program digital signal processors with some kilowords (1word=4bytes) of memory - i can tell you 512MB is an awful lot and you could store some telephone books simultaneously in such an amount of memory. Frankly, I'm not wondering why anyone could log on with 512MB, i wonder how this could be not enough. What has gone wrong in the software industry? bakunin |
|
#6
10-19-2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
No hard feelings
 I don't think that something went wrong, it's just that some applications require more resources these days, due to extended business needs, or they simply have memory leaks, even some enterprise products.But 512 MB ram should be enough, a while ago I had FreeBSD 6.0 with 3Ghz CPU and 512 MB RAM, running AMP + 700 user accounts, each has shell and ftp access with 1G quota, and it was doing pretty good. But let's not change the subject of the topic - the site performance is much better |
|
#7
10-19-2007
|
|||
|
|||
|
Performance is much much better.
Glad about that very much ! Great work ! Cheers ! |
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |
Tetris Champion!
Linear Mode
