![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX and Linux RSS News The latest news covering Solaris, RedHat, Ubuntu, Debian, Slackware, HP-UX, AIX, BSD, Apple OS X and more! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to automate check outs from version control? | siegfried | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 5 | 04-12-2008 01:35 AM |
| Whi I'm getting control-M's | padpa | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 14 | 12-13-2007 07:18 AM |
| FDA says no new labeling for nanotech products - Washington Post | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 07-25-2007 04:00 PM |
| Automatic disk labeling | kwachtler | SUN Solaris | 1 | 09-25-2006 10:21 PM |
| Version Control | Deepa | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 05-12-2002 02:51 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Version labeling is out of control
Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:00:00 GMT
Anybody who spends time trying new free software applications and distributions will soon notice that version numbering and labeling is next to meaningless. These days, versioning rarely gives an accurate idea of the state of development, except relative to other builds of the same project. It is simply a label that distinguishes one build from another. That's too bad, because a properly labeled release can give users a sense of how advanced the build actually is. Source... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|