|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how can i test my tape throughput in Mb/sec? | progressdll | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 01-07-2007 12:13 AM |
| Sun: High kernel usage & very high load averages | lorrainenineill | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 4 | 02-06-2006 09:32 AM |
| improve this? | blowtorch | Shell Programming and Scripting | 11 | 08-04-2005 12:53 AM |
| Can I improve this script ??? | Cameron | Shell Programming and Scripting | 11 | 10-22-2002 05:39 PM |
 |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
04-10-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
How much can you improve network throughput with a high-end NIC?
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:00:00 GMT
What sort of impact can you expect from switching a machine from the Gigabit Ethernet NIC that come on its motherboard to a higher-end Intel desktop NIC? I benchmarked two common gigabit NICs found on motherboards against two Intel PCIe desktop gigabit NICs, targeting the specific purpose of accessing an NFS share over the network. The short version: throughput for sequential read/write operations didn't improve much, but latency was much better, allowing anything that needs a network round trip, like create, delete, and seek, to work much faster. Source... 
|
||||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
