The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > News, Links, Events and Announcements > UNIX and Linux RSS News
.
google unix.com



UNIX and Linux RSS News The latest news covering Solaris, RedHat, Ubuntu, Debian, Slackware, HP-UX, AIX, BSD, Apple OS X and more!

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Berger Singerman's 22nd bill in the SCO bankruptcy iBot UNIX and Linux RSS News 0 08-20-2009 05:45 PM
Berger Singerman's Bill for May Shows One Buyer for SCO - Updated iBot UNIX and Linux RSS News 0 06-30-2009 08:30 PM
allowing members of a group to kill a process vastcharade High Level Programming 1 01-17-2008 07:55 PM
Allowing acces to ports < 1024 w/o root rpollard Security 2 05-09-2002 11:23 AM

 
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2009
iBot's Avatar
iBot iBot is offline
Forum Robot Girl
  
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 22,163
Berger Singerman Asks for an Order Allowing it to Pay Itself from Retainer

Things are not so free and easy in SCOland, I gather, now that the Chapter 11 Trustee is running the company. Berger Singerman has filed a motion on its own behalf asking the court to please amend a prior order, the October 5, 2007 Administrative Order Establishing Procedures for Interim Monthly Compensation of Professionals, so the firm can pay itself from the retainer it has in hand. It's been doing that for a while, but it seems the Chapter 11 Trustee notices that there is no explicit allowance to use the retainer in that order. If you remember, he already signaled that he's looking into all the professional fees. So Berger Singerman would like an explicit order from the court saying it's all right to do that.
The motion lists the retainer as being currently $340,536, and they need to dip into it some more because while "Debtors paid the interim monthly payments to the Movant to the best of their reasonable abilities throughout the cases", "eventually cash flow became an issue". Indeed.

More...
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0