![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX and Linux RSS News The latest news covering Solaris, RedHat, Ubuntu, Debian, Slackware, HP-UX, AIX, BSD, Apple OS X and more! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SCO Files its Appeal Brief in SCO v. Novell | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 03-12-2009 06:30 PM |
| SCO Files Notice of Appeal in Novell Litigation - Updated 2Xs | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 03-01-2009 04:05 PM |
| SCO Likely To Appeal Novell Ruling, CEO Darl McBride Says - InformationWeek | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 08-29-2007 11:00 AM |
| SCO Likely To Appeal Novell Ruling, CEO Darl McBride Says - InformationWeek | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 08-29-2007 10:30 AM |
| Ruling on Novell’s Unix assets bolsters OSS, binds Novell and IBM - ZDNet.com blogs | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 08-11-2007 06:10 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|||||
|
SCO Files Reply Brief in the appeal of SCO v. Novell
SCO has filed its reply to Novell's brief:
04/23/2009 Open Document [9654117] Appellant's reply brief filed by SCO Group. Original and 7 copies. Served on 04/23/2009. Manner of Service: email.I haven't read it yet myself, so we will do so together. Here's Groklaw's timeline page for the appeal, and you can find the documents there. Thank you, Erwan! I've added that timeline to the menu. Here's SCO's appeal brief and this is Novell's brief that this one is replying to. While I will read it carefully now, the opening six pages, to my quick reading, reflect SCO's usual casual nod in the direction of accuracy. For example, how do you like this sentence: This is the rare case where the principals on both sides of the contract agree on the parties' intent.I think not, m'lord. That's why you are in appeals court. More... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|