|
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX and Linux RSS News The latest news covering Solaris, RedHat, Ubuntu, Debian, Slackware, HP-UX, AIX, BSD, Apple OS X and more! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Mistaken Conviction Based on Digital Forensics – Part 2 – The Trial, Day 1 | iBot | IT Security RSS | 0 | 01-27-2009 10:30 PM |
| AIX Trial Version | secofr | AIX | 1 | 05-02-2008 07:40 AM |
| Ruling on Novell’s Unix assets bolsters OSS, binds Novell and IBM - ZDNet.com blogs | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 08-11-2007 07:10 PM |
| How to turn on Audit trial for Solaris 8 | civic2005 | SUN Solaris | 2 | 02-22-2007 11:45 AM |
| VI Editor Trial Version? | elamvik | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 01-08-2002 04:53 AM |
 |
Powered by 
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
03-24-2009
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Maciaszek Trial Testimony in SCO/Novell Contradicted
I found something eye-poppingly interesting. Do you remember at the SCO v. Novell trial, where John Maciaszek testified that there was never a charge for earlier versions of Unix/UnixWare? That going all the way back to AT&T days, the earlier products were thrown in free? I have gotten hold of a contract where it seems to me that the licensee was charged for earlier products. Yes. $400 a copy.
More... |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
