![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| will this script in crontab effect SUN 9?? | thepurple | SUN Solaris | 2 | 10-05-2007 04:31 AM |
| Temporarily disable effect of set -e in ksh | ugeek | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 03-28-2007 04:21 AM |
| How do properties effect script? | Chiefos | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 06-21-2006 06:23 AM |
| Effect of Preemptive Kernel | sriram.ec | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 03-15-2006 01:43 AM |
| Recursive FTP | aslamg | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 03-08-2001 04:27 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I run the following command in some of my folders... and ended up with a huge mess!!
find . -type f -exec perl -e 's/blabla/zzzxxxx/gi' -p -i.bak {} \; I had to kill the process and later when I checked with one of my folders.. ls vaditerm.dt.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak vaditerm.dt.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak.bak can someone throw light on how this happened? Thanks, sskb (sorry if I wasted your time!!) |
|
|||||
|
Only a guess since you didn't post the -e portion (what are you running there?).
It looks like the -p option may have caused the loop that gave the mutiple extensions. See Command Switches |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|