![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Major differences between AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, Linux | gurukottur | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 9 | 06-27-2006 10:57 PM |
| C program in Unix / Linux - Time differences | chprvkmr | High Level Programming | 11 | 09-08-2005 09:46 PM |
| Socket implementation differences | charlcy | HP-UX | 3 | 05-07-2005 02:54 PM |
| Solaris Unix vs HP Unix, Could someone point out the major differences. | Hack | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 10-29-2001 10:08 AM |
| Unix and Solaris differences | theboxer01 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 03-08-2001 07:48 AM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Socket Handling Differences Between Linux & Unix?
Sorry if this is a stupid question!
I have been developing a Java application that I am deploying on both Unix and Linux servers, which uses lots of socket handling. When the server side connection is dropped by the server un-gracefully I have been seeing close_waits and null connections. I am working through socket handling and fixing problems as I go, but my question is: Do I need to re-test everything on both Linux and Unix, or is the socket handling identical between the 2? i.e. if I complete all testing on Linux, can I release the applicaion on Unix with 100% confidence that there are no underlying socket handling differences that could cause close_wait or null connection problems later? Unix = HP-UX 11i Linux = RH4 Thanks. |
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
| Tags |
| differences, linux, socket handling, unix |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|