|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Rules & FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| make file_Configuration lookup disabled for target. | mannam srinivas | Linux | 0 | 04-16-2008 12:19 AM |
| Error: No Route to host...urgent {socket() connection} | arunchaudhary19 | High Level Programming | 6 | 10-30-2007 12:10 AM |
| How to delete the files from local host to remote host | krishna176 | SUN Solaris | 3 | 03-24-2007 12:48 PM |
| no route to host | scoman2 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 6 | 08-30-2004 04:58 AM |
| QNX host cannot ping SCO host, vice versa | gavon | IP Networking | 2 | 08-20-2001 05:57 PM |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-07-2002
|
|||
|
|||
|
add route gives target: Host name lookup failure
We need to add our remote office to our linux routing table.
Our internal office ip addresses are all in the range of 198.9.200.x with an subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 the remote office has ip addresses in the range of 192.168.0.0 and also a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 when i use the following 'route' command, i get target: Host name lookup failure this is the command: route -v add target 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 198.9.200.42 metric 1 dev eth0 |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
08-07-2002
|
|||
|
|||
|
As far i can see is 'targewt' not a valid option.
In this case the route command thinks target is a hostname and tries to lookup this host. I think: route -v add 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 198.9.200.42 metric 1 dev eth0 wil do the job regards |
|
08-07-2002
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's it. Target is a variable that i need to substitute.
Sorry. Fixed now. Dank u JanR, |
Linear Mode
