The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Google UNIX.COM


UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !!

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fsck run efang SUN Solaris 2 07-19-2006 09:49 PM
fsck - what should be done? duke0001 UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 3 11-22-2005 06:10 PM
fsck run_time_error SUN Solaris 5 09-14-2005 04:16 AM
HPUX and Compaq problem-urgent Shobhit High Level Programming 7 05-15-2002 08:43 AM
fsck -y rpatrick Filesystems, Disks and Memory 4 03-27-2002 07:51 PM

Closed Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-13-2002
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: India
Posts: 45
Question URGENT : fsck in HPUX

Experts!!!
I have an urgent solution for a problem with the HP Unix workstation.
I am not able to check the file system for a particular volume.
when i tried with
$> fsck -o full /dev/vg00/rlvol9
Returns..
full file system check required... exiting...
$>

How do i recover the file system for this situation.

Best Regards,
Anent
Forum Sponsor
  #2  
Old 05-13-2002
Kelam_Magnus's Avatar
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: DFW McKinney, TX,
Posts: 1,069
Anent,

I believe that you need to umount this filesytem before you can fix the raw Logical Volume.Here is a link that details your exact problem. BTW, this website www.itrc.hp.com will help you answer specific HPUX questions.

http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/Questio...9cd0f9,00.html


Here is the man page entry.


-o Specify VxFS file system specific options. These
options can be a combination of the following in a


comma-separated list:

full Perform a full file system check. The default is
to perform an intent log replay only. Since the
VxFS file system maintains an intent log, a
complete check is generally not required. If the
file system detects damage or the log replay
operation detects damage, an indication that a
complete check is required is placed in the
super-block, and a full check is performed.
nolog Do not perform log replay. This option may be
used if the log area was physically damaged.

When a full check is performed, the following inconsistencies are checked:

+ Blocks claimed by more than one inode or the free list.

+ Blocks claimed by an inode outside the range of the file
system.

+ Incorrect link counts.

+ Size checks:
- Incorrect number of blocks.
- Directory entry format.

+ Bad inode format.

+ Blocks not accounted for anywhere.

+ Directory checks:
- File pointing to unallocated inode.
- Inode number out of range.
- Linkage to parent directory.
- Hash chain linkage.
- Free space count.

+ Super-block checks:
- Checksum mismatch.
- More blocks for inodes than there are in the file
system.

+ Structural Files:
- Fileset headers.
- Object Location Table (OLT).
- Inode list files.
- Inode allocation summary files.
- Attribute files (including Access Control Lists).
- Attribute link counts.

+ Bad free block list format.
+ Total free block and/or free inode count incorrect.


Orphaned files and directories (allocated but unreferenced) are, with the user's concurrence, reconnected by placing them in the lost+found directory. The name assigned is the inode number. The only restriction is that the directory lost+found must already exist in the[color=skyblue]
__________________
My brain is your brain
  #3  
Old 05-13-2002
Perderabo's Avatar
Unix Daemon
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington DC Area
Posts: 8,667
What type of filesystem is it? "-o full" is only for vxfs.
  #4  
Old 05-14-2002
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: India
Posts: 45
Thanks Kelam_Magnus and Perderabo,
Here I do tried all those options to get rid of the problem. But the same error message is returned.
Perderabo : its vxFs file system only.
I thank you for your valuable response.

Thanks,
Anent
  #5  
Old 05-14-2002
Perderabo's Avatar
Unix Daemon
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington DC Area
Posts: 8,667
In that case I would suspect that your fsck is broken. Have you installed the recommended patches?
Google The UNIX and Linux Forums
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger Visit The Complex Event Processing Blog

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0